A company advertises its backup memory device as having 500GB of storage. A customer wishes to know how any 8MB files could be stored in the device. The company claimed that up to 62500 files (assuming each file is 8MB) could be stored. The customer calculated that 64000 files could be stored. Explain the difference between these 2 storage values. Show any calculations you use in your explanation.

A company advertises its backup memory device as having 500GB of storage. A customer wishes to know how any 8MB files could be stored in the device. The company claimed that up to 62500 files (assuming each file is 8MB) could be stored. The customer calculated that 64000 files could be stored. Explain the difference between these 2 storage values. Show any calculations you use in your explanation.

Systems Architecture

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305080195

Author:Stephen D. Burd

Publisher:Stephen D. Burd

Chapter5: Data Storage Technology

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13VE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

There are many different kinds of digital memory that may be used, such as cache memory, hard disc drives (HDD), random access memory (RAM), solid state drives (SSD), and others. Cache memory is used to store frequently used data. The use of computers makes all of these things available to the user. Is it beneficial to have a variety of standards, or would it be more convenient for customers if there was only one memory standard, with the exception of varying sizes of solid-state drives (SSDs)? If having numerous standards has any advantages, what exactly are those advantages? Is there any advantage to having a wide variety of standards to choose from? If there was just one standard that needed to be adhered to, would that make things easier and more economical for customers?
There is more than one kind of digital memory that may be used, such as a hard disk drive (HDD), random access memory (RAM), solid state drives (SSD), and cache memory. All of these can be found in computers. Is there a benefit to having numerous standards, or would it be better for customers if there was just one memory standard, such as only the different sizes of SSDs? Is there an advantage to having many standards? If there was only one standard to adhere to, would it make things easier and cheaper for customers?
There are many different kinds of digital memory that may be used, such as cache memory, hard disk drives (HDD), random access memory (RAM), solid state drives (SSD), and others. Cache memory is used to store frequently used data. The use of computers makes all of these things available to the user. Is it beneficial to have a variety of standards, or would it be more convenient for customers if there was only one memory standard, with the exception of varying sizes of solid-state drives (SSDs)? If having numerous standards has any advantages, what exactly are those advantages? Is there any advantage to having a wide variety of standards to choose from? If there was just one standard that needed to be adhered to, would that make things easier and more economical for customers?
There are several different kinds of digital memory that may be employed. These include cache memory, hard disc drives (HDD), random access memory (RAM), and solid state drives (SSD). Through the usage of computers, one may have access to all of these features. Is it preferable for customers that there be many memory standards, or would it be sufficient if there were only different SSD sizes? In such case, what advantages does it have to have various standards? Is there value in having a wide variety of benchmarks? Would it be easier and cheaper for shoppers if there was only one criterion that had to be met?
There are many different types of digital memory available, including hard disk drives (HDD), random access memory (RAM), solid state drives (SSD), and cache memory. Is it beneficial to have several memory standards, or would it be better for consumers if there was just one memory standard, such as the various sizes of SSDs, for example? If all standards were implemented at the same time, would it be more cost effective and convenient for consumers?
Hard disc drives (HDD), random access memory (RAM), solid-state drives (SSD), and cache memory are all types of digital memory. Is it preferable to have a number of different memory standards, or would it be more convenient for consumers if there was only one, comparable to the sizes of SSDs? Is it more cost effective and easy for customers to have a single standard? There are two methods to access memory: sequentially and directly. Why is direct access becoming more prevalent in essential gadgets? How are we going to be able to transfer data from a device that only supports direct access to one that only supports sequential access?
There are many different kinds of digital memory, such as hard disc drives (HDD), random access memory (RAM), solid state drives (SSD), and cache memory, from which users may choose the one that best suits their needs. What are the advantages of having a number of different memory standards, and how would the market be different if there was only one memory standard, taking into account the different capacities of different solid-state drives (SSDs)? Is it possible that adhering to a single standard might result in consumers incurring less costs and enjoying more convenience?
There are many different kinds of digital memory, such as hard disc drives (HDD), random access memory (RAM), solid state drives (SSD), and cache memory, from which users may choose the one that best suits their needs. What are the advantages of having a number of different memory standards, and how would the market be different if there was only one memory standard, taking into account the different capacities of different solid-state drives (SSDs)? Is it feasible that adhering to a single standard might result in consumers incurring less costs and enjoying more convenience?
The terms "digital memory" and "storage device" are often used interchangeably. To what extent would it benefit consumers if there were a single memory standard, similar to how there is just one standard for SSD sizes? Can customers save money and time by adopting a single standard? There are two methods for accessing memory: sequential and direct. For what reason are more and more essential devices adopting direct access? How can we move information from a sequential-access device to a direct-access device?
Hard disk drives (HDD), random access memory (RAM), solid-state drives (SSD), and cache memory are all examples of digital memory. The different sizes of solid-state drives (SSDs) beg the question: why have so many different memory standards if they all serve the same purpose? Is it feasible that if there was just one standard, it would benefit consumers financially and make their lives easier?
Digital memory may be implemented via a wide variety of storage media, including cache memory, hard disc drives (HDD), random access memory (RAM), and solid state drives (SSD). Using a computer, you can get any of these things. Considering the numerous different sizes of solid-state drives (SSDs), is there any benefit to having so many different standards, or would it be better for consumers if there was just one? Please elaborate on the benefits, if any, of having several standards. Does it beneficial to have several different standards to compare against? Would it make things simpler and cheaper for consumers if there was only one standard that had to be met?
Digital memory comes in various forms, including hard disc drives (HDD), random access memory (RAM), solid state drives (SSD), and cache memory. Should there be several different memory standards, such as the many different solid-state drive (SSD) sizes, or would consumers be better off with just one? Is it more practical and affordable for customers to adopt a single standard? The alternative to sequential memory access is direct memory access. The use of direct access in increasingly important gadgets, why? Is there a method to transfer data from a sequential-access device to a direct-access one?