(a) Carry out a test of the null hypothesis that the theory is correct, using level of significance a = 0.05. Use technology to calculate the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) P-value = What can you conclude? O Reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that the theory is incorrect. O Fail to reject H. We have convincing evidence that the theory is incorrect. O Fail to reject Ho- We do not have convincing evidence that the theory is incorrect. O Reject H. We do not have convincing evidence evidence that the theory is incorrect. (b) Suppose that a random sample of 300 plants had resulted in the same value of x2. How would the analysis and conclusion differ from those in part (a)? O The previous analysis did not yield a significant result and the null hypothesis failed to be rejected. The new analysis would yield a significant result and the null hypothesis would b rejected. ould not chango

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
A certain genetic characteristic of a particular plant can appear in one of three forms (phenotypes). A researcher has developed a theory, according to which the hypothesized proportions are
P₁ = 0.25, P₂ = 0.50, and P3 = 0.25. A random sample of 200 plants yields x² = 4.76.
(a) Carry out a test of the null hypothesis that the theory is correct, using level of significance a = 0.05.
Use technology to calculate the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
P-value =
What can you conclude?
O Reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that the theory is incorrect.
O Fail to reject H. We have convincing evidence that the theory is incorrect.
Fail to reject Ho. We do not have convincing evidence that the theory is incorrect.
O Reject H. We do not have convincing evidence evidence that the theory is incorrect.
(b) Suppose that a random sample of 300 plants had resulted in the same value of x². How would the analysis and conclusion differ from those in part (a)?
O The previous analysis did not yield a significant result and the null hypothesis failed to be rejected. The new analysis would yield a significant result and the null hypothesis would be
rejected.
O The analysis and conclusions would not change.
O The previous analysis did not yield a significant result and the null hypothesis was rejected. The new analysis would yield a significant result and the null hypothesis would fail to be
rejected.
O The previous analysis yielded a significant result and the null hypothesis failed to be rejected. The new analysis would not yield a significant result and the null hypothesis would be
rejected.
O The previous analysis yielded a significant result and the null hypothesis was rejected. The new analysis would not yield a significant result and the null hypothesis would fail to be
rejected.
Transcribed Image Text:A certain genetic characteristic of a particular plant can appear in one of three forms (phenotypes). A researcher has developed a theory, according to which the hypothesized proportions are P₁ = 0.25, P₂ = 0.50, and P3 = 0.25. A random sample of 200 plants yields x² = 4.76. (a) Carry out a test of the null hypothesis that the theory is correct, using level of significance a = 0.05. Use technology to calculate the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) P-value = What can you conclude? O Reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that the theory is incorrect. O Fail to reject H. We have convincing evidence that the theory is incorrect. Fail to reject Ho. We do not have convincing evidence that the theory is incorrect. O Reject H. We do not have convincing evidence evidence that the theory is incorrect. (b) Suppose that a random sample of 300 plants had resulted in the same value of x². How would the analysis and conclusion differ from those in part (a)? O The previous analysis did not yield a significant result and the null hypothesis failed to be rejected. The new analysis would yield a significant result and the null hypothesis would be rejected. O The analysis and conclusions would not change. O The previous analysis did not yield a significant result and the null hypothesis was rejected. The new analysis would yield a significant result and the null hypothesis would fail to be rejected. O The previous analysis yielded a significant result and the null hypothesis failed to be rejected. The new analysis would not yield a significant result and the null hypothesis would be rejected. O The previous analysis yielded a significant result and the null hypothesis was rejected. The new analysis would not yield a significant result and the null hypothesis would fail to be rejected.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 11 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman