9) What? This problem again? Not exactly. A block with mass m 1 = 3.00 kg sits on a horizontal table and is attached to a rope. The rope then passes over a MASSIVE pulley this time and is attached to a block of mass m 2 = 2.00 kg, which hangs vertically (see picture). The coefficient of kinetic friction of the interface between the table and m 1 is 0.1 . You may assume the pulley section is a disk with a mass of 2 kg. We will keep the pulley frictionless for brevity. Find the acceleration of the blocks using your choice of either Newton’s Laws or the energy conservation method. Yes, I can actually read your minds from here; and the answer is no, you do not need the radius of the pulley
9) What? This problem again? Not exactly. A block with mass m 1 = 3.00 kg sits on a horizontal table and is attached to a rope. The rope then passes over a MASSIVE pulley this time and is attached to a block of mass m 2 = 2.00 kg, which hangs vertically (see picture). The coefficient of kinetic friction of the interface between the table and m 1 is 0.1 . You may assume the pulley section is a disk with a mass of 2 kg. We will keep the pulley frictionless for brevity. Find the acceleration of the blocks using your choice of either Newton’s Laws or the energy conservation method. Yes, I can actually read your minds from here; and the answer is no, you do not need the radius of the pulley
Related questions
Question
9)
What? This problem again? Not exactly. A block with mass m
1
= 3.00 kg sits on
a horizontal table and is attached to a rope. The rope then passes over a
MASSIVE
pulley this time and is attached to a block of mass m
2
= 2.00 kg, which
hangs vertically (see picture). The coefficient of kinetic friction of the interface
between the table and m
1
is 0.1
. You may assume the pulley section is a disk with
a mass of 2 kg. We will keep the pulley frictionless for brevity.
Find the acceleration of the blocks using your choice of either Newton’s Laws
or the energy conservation method.
Yes, I can actually read your minds from here;
and the answer is no, you do not need the radius of the pulley
Transcribed Image Text:m1
Ideal disk
m2
pulley
with mass
of 2 kg
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps with 2 images
