7. On 25 October 2003, at the Santa Anita Racetrack in Arcadia, California,Mr. Graham Stone, from Rapid City, South Dakota, won a single betin which he had picked the winner of six successive races! Mr. Stonehad never visited a racetrack; racing fans across the nation werestunned. The winning horses, and the odds of each horse winning, asdetermined just before the race in which it ran, were as follows:Winning HorseOds1. Six Perfections5-12. Cajun Beat3. Islington4. Action This Day5. High Chaparral6. Pleasantly Perfect22–13-126-15-114-1Mr. Stone's wager cost $8; his payoff was $2,687,661.60.The odds against such good fortune (or handicapping skill?), wemight say in casual conversation, are "a million to one." Mr. Stone'spayoff was at a rate far below that. Did he deserve a million-to-onepayoff? How would you justify your answer?

The odds of winning is representing the odds in favor. So for first horse, favorable case of winning…

7. On 25 October 2003, at the Santa Anita Racetrack in Arcadia, California, Mr. Graham Stone, from Rapid City, South Dakota, won a single bet in which he had picked the winner of six successive races! Mr. Stone had never visited a racetrack; racing fans across the nation were stunned. The winning horses, and the odds of each horse winning, as determined just before the race in which it ran, were as follows: Winning Horse Odds 1. Six Perfections 5-1 2. Cajun Beat 3. Islington 4. Action This Day 5. High Chaparral 6. Pleasantly Perfect 22-1 3-1 26-1 5-1 14-1 Mr. Stone's wager cost $8; his payoff was $2,687,661.60. The odds against such good fortune (or handicapping skill?), we might say in casual conversation, are "a million to one." Mr. Stone's payoff was at a rate far below that. Did he deserve a million-to-one payoff? How would you justify your answer?

7. On 25 October 2003, at the Santa Anita Racetrack in Arcadia, California, Mr. Graham Stone, from Rapid City, South Dakota, won a single bet in which he had picked the winner of six successive races! Mr. Stone had never visited a racetrack; racing fans across the nation were stunned. The winning horses, and the odds of each horse winning, as determined just before the race in which it ran, were as follows: Winning Horse Odds 1. Six Perfections 5-1 2. Cajun Beat 3. Islington 4. Action This Day 5. High Chaparral 6. Pleasantly Perfect 22-1 3-1 26-1 5-1 14-1 Mr. Stone's wager cost $8; his payoff was $2,687,661.60. The odds against such good fortune (or handicapping skill?), we might say in casual conversation, are "a million to one." Mr. Stone's payoff was at a rate far below that. Did he deserve a million-to-one payoff? How would you justify your answer?

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)

10th Edition

ISBN:9780134753119

Author:Sheldon Ross

Publisher:Sheldon Ross

Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A raffle sells 3000 tickets and 50 of them win a prize. If a person buys a raffle ticket, determine their:(a)odds against winning a prize and simplify. (b)odds in favor of winning a prize and simplify.
If you know the names of the remaining seven students in the spelling bee, what is the probability of randomly selecting an order and getting the order that is used in the spelling bee? P(selecting the correct spelling bee order) = %3D (Type an integer or a simplified fraction.)
Find the odds against obtaining the following outcome. one of the face (picture) cards (jack, queen, king) when drawing 1 card from an ordinary deck of 52 cards
A card is selected from a standard deck of 52 cards. What are the odds of selecting a red 9?
A magazine ran a sweepstakes in which prizes were listed along with the chances of winning: $1,000,000 (1 chance in 80,000,000), $100,000 (1 chance in 130,000,000), S25,000 (1 chance in 130,000,000), $5,000 (1 chance in 35,667.000), and $2,500 (1 chance in 27,500,000). Complete a and b. a. Assuming that there is no cost to enter the sweepstakes, find the expected value of the amount won for one entry. ¢ (Round to the nearest tenth as needed.) b. Find the expected value if the cost of entering this sweepstakes is the cost of a postage stamp (3¢). |(Round to the nearest tenth as needed) Is it worth entering this contest? O A. No. It is not worth entering this contest because the new expected value is negative. O B. Yes. It is worth entering this contest because the new expected value is negative. O C. No. It is not worth entering this contest because the new expected value is positive. O D. Yes. It is worth entering this contest because the new expected value is positive.
K From a set of ten marbles, seven red and three yellow, we choose one at random. a. What are the odds in favor of choosing a red marble? b. What are the odds against choosing a red marble? a. The odds in favor of choosing a red marble are (Simplify your answers.)
A magazine ran a sweepstakes in which prizes were listed along with the chances of winning: $1,000,000 (1 chance in 90,000,000), $100,000 (1 chance in 120,000,000), $25,000 (1 chance in 120,000,000), $5,000 (1 chance in 36,667,000), and $2,500 (1 chance in 27,500,000). Complete a and b. Round to the nearest tenth as needed. a. Assuming that there is no cost to enter the sweepstakes, find the expected value of the amount won for one entry. __cent b. Find the expected value if the cost of entering this sweepstakes is the cost of a postage stamp (3cent). __cent
At Monday night Bingo, there is also a raffle being held for a 55-inch flat-screen television. If 1300 tickets were sold, and you purchased 40 tickets for $1 each, What are the odds in favor of your winning the television?:Enter your result in lowest terms (remove common factors)
Of the 125 million households in the U.S., 86 million of them have a pet. If you randomly survey a sample of 6 households, what are the odds that all six of them have a pet?