6. Individual Problems 17-6 The HR department is trying to fill a vacant position for a job with a small talent pool. Valid applications arrive every week or so, and the applicants all seem to bring different levels of expertise. For each applicant, the HR manager gathers information by trying to verify various claims on the candidate's résumé, but some doubt about "fit" always lingers when a decision to hire or not is to be made. Suppose that hiring an employee who is a bad fit for the company results in an error cost of $900, but failing to hire a good employee results in an error cost of $200 to the company. Although it is impossible to tell in advance whether an employee is a good fit, assume that the probability that an applicant is a "good fit" is 0.4, while the probability that an applicant is a "bad fit" is 1- 0.4 = 0.6. Hiring an applicant who is a good fit, as well as not hiring an applicant who is a bad fit, results in no error cost to the company. For each decision in the following table, calculate and enter the expected error cost of that decision. Reality Good Fit Bad Fit Decision p=0.4 p=0.6 Expected Eror Cost Hire Cost: 0 Cost: $900 Do Not Hire Cost: $200 Cost: 0 24 not hire Suppose an otherwise qualified applicant applies for a job. hire In order to minimize expected error costs, the HR department should the applicant.

Principles of Economics 2e
2nd Edition
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Chapter16: Information, Risk, And Insurance
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 18RQ: What are some of the metrics economists use to measure health outcomes?
icon
Related questions
Question
6. Individual Problems 17-6
The HR department is trying to fill a vacant position for a job with a small talent pool. Valid applications arrive every week or so, and the applicants all
seem to bring different levels of expertise. For each applicant, the HR manager gathers information by trying to verify various claims on the
candidate's résumé, but some doubt about "fit" always lingers when a decision to hire or not is to be made.
Suppose that hiring an employee who is a bad fit for the company results in an error cost of $900, but failing to hire a good employee results in an
error cost of $200 to the company. Although it is impossible to tell in advance whether an employee is a good fit, assume that the probability that an
applicant is a "good fit" is 0.4, while the probability that an applicant is a "bad fit" is 1– 0.4 = 0.6. Hiring an applicant who is a good fit, as well as not
hiring an applicant who is a bad fit, results in no error cost to the company.
For each decision in the following table, calculate and enter the expected error cost of that decision.
Reality
Good Fit
Bad Fit
Decision
p=0.4
p=0.6
Expected Error Cost
Hire
Cost: 0
Cost: $900
Do Not Hire
Cost: $200
Cost: 0
$
not hire
Suppose an otherwise qualified applicant applies for a job.
hire
In order to minimize expected error costs, the HR department should
the applicant.
Transcribed Image Text:6. Individual Problems 17-6 The HR department is trying to fill a vacant position for a job with a small talent pool. Valid applications arrive every week or so, and the applicants all seem to bring different levels of expertise. For each applicant, the HR manager gathers information by trying to verify various claims on the candidate's résumé, but some doubt about "fit" always lingers when a decision to hire or not is to be made. Suppose that hiring an employee who is a bad fit for the company results in an error cost of $900, but failing to hire a good employee results in an error cost of $200 to the company. Although it is impossible to tell in advance whether an employee is a good fit, assume that the probability that an applicant is a "good fit" is 0.4, while the probability that an applicant is a "bad fit" is 1– 0.4 = 0.6. Hiring an applicant who is a good fit, as well as not hiring an applicant who is a bad fit, results in no error cost to the company. For each decision in the following table, calculate and enter the expected error cost of that decision. Reality Good Fit Bad Fit Decision p=0.4 p=0.6 Expected Error Cost Hire Cost: 0 Cost: $900 Do Not Hire Cost: $200 Cost: 0 $ not hire Suppose an otherwise qualified applicant applies for a job. hire In order to minimize expected error costs, the HR department should the applicant.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Interest rate
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics 2e
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:
9781947172364
Author:
Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:
OpenStax