5. In a large class, the instructor ran a regression with the independent variable(x) as the grade on the first exam and thedependent variable(y) being the grade on the second exam. She found the equation to be:Y = 29.25 + .57XKnowing that your friend got a 78 on the first exam, what value would you predict she got on the second exam?a) 71.43b) 72.57c) 78.00d) 73.716. A test result is one that detects the condition when the condition is present is called.a) True Negativeb) False positivec) Sensitivityd) True Positive7. A test result is one that detects the condition when the condition is absent is called.a) True Negativeb) False positivec) Sensitivityd) True PositiveTN8. The proportion of positives that correspond to the presence of the condition is called. The formula isTN + FPa) Specificityb) Predictive value positivec) Sensitivityd) Predictive value negative9. A measurement the ability of a test to detect the condition when the condition is present is called. The formula isТРTP + FNa) Predictive value positiveb) Predictive value negativec) Specificityd) Sensitivity10. A test result is one that does NOT detect the condition when the condition when the condition is present is called.a) False Negativeb) False positivec) True Negatived) True Positive3

Comments: As per our guidelines we are supposed to answer only one question. Kindly repost other…

5. In a large class, the instructor ran a regression with the independent variable(x) as the grade on the first exam and the dependent variable(y) being the grade on the second exam. She found the equation to be: Y = 29.25 + .57X Knowing that your friend got a 78 on the first exam, what value would you predict she got on the second exam? a) 71.43 b) 72.57 c) 78.00 d) 73.71

5. In a large class, the instructor ran a regression with the independent variable(x) as the grade on the first exam and the dependent variable(y) being the grade on the second exam. She found the equation to be: Y = 29.25 + .57X Knowing that your friend got a 78 on the first exam, what value would you predict she got on the second exam? a) 71.43 b) 72.57 c) 78.00 d) 73.71

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The arm span and foot length were both measured (in centimeters) for each of 20 students in a biology class. The computer output displays the regression analysis. Which of the following is the best interpretation of the coefficient of determination r2? About 37% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length. About 65% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span. About 63% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length. About 63% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span.
A regression was run to determine if there is a relationship between hours of TV watched per day (x) and number of situps a person can do (y).The results of the regression were:y=ax+b a=-0.982 b=31.084 r2=0.471969 r=-0.687 Use this to predict the number of situps a person who watches 13.5 hours of TV can do (to one decimal place)
A regression was run to determine if there is a relationship between hours of TV watched per day (x) and number of situps a person can do (y).The results of the regression were: y=a+bx b=-0.997 a=20.107 r2=0.950625 r=-0.975 Use this to predict the number of situps a person who watches 0.5 hours of TV can do.Round to one decimal place.
A regression was run to determine if there is a relationship between hours of TV watched per day (x) and number of situps a person can do (y).The results of the regression were: y=ax+b a=-1.383 b=24.599 r2=0.962361 r=-0.981 Use this to predict the number of situps a person who watches 5.5 hours of TV can do (to one decimal place)
A regression was run to determine if there is a relationship between hours of TV watched per day (x) and number of situps a person can do (y).The results of the regression were:y=a+bx b=-0.736 a=32.667 r2=0.576081 r=-0.759 Use this to predict the number of situps a person who watches 6 hours of TV can do.
A regression was run to determine if there is a relationship between hours of TV watched per day (x) and number of situps a person can do (y). The results of the regression were: ý=ax+b a=-0.873 b=26.236 r2=0.527076 r=-0.726 Use this to predict the number of situps a person who watches 11 hours of TV can do (to one decimal place)
A regression analysis was performed to determine if there is a relationship between hours of TV watched per day (x) and number of sit ups a person can do (y).The results of the regression were: ˆy=-1.278 x+x+31.637r2=0.719104r2r=−0.848 Use this to predict the number of sit ups a person who watches 12 hours of TV can do, and please round your answer to a whole number.
A biologist was recording various temperatures (in degrees Celsius) and predicting the amount of glucose produced by a plant (in milligrams). Suppose the linear equation was the following: ?̂ = 12.7 − 0.223? d) Suppose the correlation coefficient was −0.12. How would you classify the correlation between temperature and amount of glucose?
A regression was run to determine if there is a relationship between hours of TV watched per day (x) and number of situps a person can do (y). The results of the regression were: y=a+bx b=-0.993 a=29.135 r2=0.463761 r=-0.681 Use this to predict the number of situps a person who watches 6 hours of TV can do. Round to one decimal place.
A regression analysis was performed to determine if there is a relationship between hours of TV watched per day (x) and number of sit ups a person can do (y ). The results of the regression were: y=ax+b a=-1.33 b=25.138 r2=0.712336 r=-0.844 Use this to predict the number of sit ups a person who watches 10 hours of TV can do, and please round your answer to a whole number.