5. In 2006, tennis introduced a challenge system in which a player can challenge a decision as to whether a tennis ball was correctly called 'in' or ʻout’ by an official. In the 2015 U.S. Open Tennis Championship there were a total of 850 player challenges between both the Men's and Women's Singles matches. These challenges were determined either to be correct (meaning the player was correct and the umpire was incorrect) or incorrect (meaning the player was incorrect and the umpire was correct). These 850 challenges are summarized in the table below. Player Challenge Men's Women's Correct 153 72 Incorrect 394 231 (a) Calculate the proportion of all challenges that were determined to be correct. (b) Using these data as a representative sample of all player challenges in professional tennis, a 95% confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of men's and women’s challenges that are determined to be correct (men – women) was found to be 0.04 ± 0.06. All conditions for inference were met. Does this confidence interval provide convincing statistical evidence that there is a difference in the effectiveness with which men and women use the challenge system? Justify your answer.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
5. In 2006, tenis introduced a challenge system in which a player can challenge a decision as to
whether a tennis ball was correctly called 'in’ or ´ouť by an official. In the 2015 U.S. Open Tennis
Championship there were a total of 850 player challenges between both the Men's and Women's
Singles matches. These challenges were determined either to be correct (meaning the player was
correct and the umpire was incorrect) or incorrect (meaning the player was incorrect and the umpire
was correct). These 850 challenges are summarized in the table below.
Player Challenge
Men's
Women's
Correct
153
72
Incorrect
394
231
(a) Calculate the proportion of all challenges that were determined to be correct.
(b) Using these data as a representative sample of all player challenges in professional tennis, a 95%
confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of men's and women's challenges that are
determined to be correct (men – women) was found to be 0.04 ± 0.06. All conditions for
inference were met. Does this confidence interval provide convincing statistical evidence that
there is a difference in the effectiveness with which men and women use the challenge system?
Justify your answer.
-8-
A scientific study has demonstrated that the best time for a player to use a challenge is when the
tennis ball was called 'out' but the player believes that the ball was actually ʻin’ because when objects
travel faster than the human eye the umpire is left to fill the gap with their own perception. The table
below shows the Women's Singles challenges based on if the tennis ball was called ´out’ or 'in.
Umpire Called
Ball Out
Umpire Called
Ball In
Player Challenge
Correct
61
11
Incorrect
111
120
(c) Calculate the proportion of correct player challenges when the umpire called the ball 'out' and
the proportion of correct player challenges when the umpire called the ball 'in.’
Out proportion:
In proportion:
(d) Using these data as a representative sample of all player challenges in professional tennis, a 95%
confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of correct challenges when the umpire
calls the ball 'out’ and when the umpire calls the ball 'in’ (out - in) was found to be 0.27 ± 0.09.
All conditions for inference were met. Does this confidence interval provide statistical evidence
to support the scientific findings detailed above? Justify your answer.
Transcribed Image Text:5. In 2006, tenis introduced a challenge system in which a player can challenge a decision as to whether a tennis ball was correctly called 'in’ or ´ouť by an official. In the 2015 U.S. Open Tennis Championship there were a total of 850 player challenges between both the Men's and Women's Singles matches. These challenges were determined either to be correct (meaning the player was correct and the umpire was incorrect) or incorrect (meaning the player was incorrect and the umpire was correct). These 850 challenges are summarized in the table below. Player Challenge Men's Women's Correct 153 72 Incorrect 394 231 (a) Calculate the proportion of all challenges that were determined to be correct. (b) Using these data as a representative sample of all player challenges in professional tennis, a 95% confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of men's and women's challenges that are determined to be correct (men – women) was found to be 0.04 ± 0.06. All conditions for inference were met. Does this confidence interval provide convincing statistical evidence that there is a difference in the effectiveness with which men and women use the challenge system? Justify your answer. -8- A scientific study has demonstrated that the best time for a player to use a challenge is when the tennis ball was called 'out' but the player believes that the ball was actually ʻin’ because when objects travel faster than the human eye the umpire is left to fill the gap with their own perception. The table below shows the Women's Singles challenges based on if the tennis ball was called ´out’ or 'in. Umpire Called Ball Out Umpire Called Ball In Player Challenge Correct 61 11 Incorrect 111 120 (c) Calculate the proportion of correct player challenges when the umpire called the ball 'out' and the proportion of correct player challenges when the umpire called the ball 'in.’ Out proportion: In proportion: (d) Using these data as a representative sample of all player challenges in professional tennis, a 95% confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of correct challenges when the umpire calls the ball 'out’ and when the umpire calls the ball 'in’ (out - in) was found to be 0.27 ± 0.09. All conditions for inference were met. Does this confidence interval provide statistical evidence to support the scientific findings detailed above? Justify your answer.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Point Estimation, Limit Theorems, Approximations, and Bounds
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman