5. Collaborate to find out what measures have been met in Nepal and in Switzerland to reduce the dangers posed by glacial lake outbursts (M 11 and M 12).
Transcribed Image Text: М 11
How did people react in Switzerland?
In reaction to these catastrophic events, flood preven-
tion was introduced in Switzerland. The measures proved large volumes of water could collect again. “Such a po-
to be successful during a period of glacier growth in the
1970s and early 1980s. New problems, however, devel-
oped when glacier thinning started to accelerate again.
cause its complete disappearance. As a consequence,
tentially hazardous development would be without his-
torical precedent but could be identified at an early stage
with the help of an adequate observation system," says
Haeberli. For instance, at this stage the glacial lake at the
Triftgletscher is controlled by cameras, sending their im-
ages day and night to a monitoring station in Zurich. Since
2010, the maximum height of the Grindelwald glacier can
be regulated because a two kilometre long sloping tunnel
was installed to drain the excess water.
Preventive measures had to be applied anew to avoid
the development of dangerous situations. A hazard miti-
gation scheme was developed with the authorities, the
Community of Saas Balen, the Canton of Valais and the
Swiss Confederation. "Finally, we had to drain one of the
lakes completely as it became increasingly dangerous",
remembers Andreas Kääb, specialist in the observation
of glacial hazards and chair of the International Working
Group on Glacier and Permafrost Hazards in Mountains.
"The lake was a real beauty. Its disappearance left our
research team with mixed feelings of relief and regret". At
the moment, there is no immediate risk from the remain-
ing lakes for the communities situated downstream. The
levels of the lakes were lowered by channels, ditches and
even gates that can be regulated. A continued or even ac-
celerated warming, however, could thin the tongue of the
Gruben glacier beyond available experience or could even
"All in all, the damaging events at the Gruben glacier in-
curred costs of around 20 million Swiss francs. However,
the costs for monitoring, field investigations, etc. would
be less than 10% of the damage sum." To forecast when
and how a GLOF event will take place is difficult and needs
detailed and multi-disciplinary investigations of the to-
tal environment of the lakes and associated factors in
the surroundings as a whole. The Swiss living in one of
the world's most intensively studied mountainous region
have sufficient organisational and financial options avail-
able for potential further measures.
(Source: Horstmann, B. (2004): Glacial Lake Outburst Floods in Nepal and Switzerland. New Threats due to Climate Change. Germanwatch, Bonn, p.7f., altered,
supplemented.)
М 12
How did people react in Nepal?
An early warning system was already installed at Tsho
Rolpa Lake in 1998 in order to warn the population when
critical levels are reached. However, this warning system
which restricted research expeditions by foreign experts
for a long time. The result is that there are several gaps
in the measurement data for Nepal. And the glaciers in
the mountainous regions of Southern Asia are also very
underrepresented in global statistics.
no longer works because of a failure to carry out mainte-
nance work and because of the theft of important techni-
cal components. And even when it was working, most
people did not pay any attention to warnings, as there
were a great number of false alarms. The installation and
maintenance of modern satellite and radio-supported
early warning systems would be highly expensive. The
World Bank already provided US$ 1 million to install the
now defective system. The government of the Netherlands
has also co-financed projects in Nepal, for example, to
create an open canal that led Tsho Rolpa Lake to sink by
3 m which, however, is not nearly enough according to
Progress in mapping the dangers has happened, however,
as modern remote studies from outside using satellites
can also be carried out for Nepal. Hazard maps initiat-
ed by the government are limited almost completely to
Kathmandu Valley, which is economically important and
densely populated. In addition, hardly any data exists for
glacial lakes that are particularly dangerous because they
are concealed or not visible to the eye.
Local organisations have introduced several measures
in close cooperation with NGOS in order to reduce the
dangers. However, technical equipment at the moraine
dam cannot completely rule out the risk of a glacial lake
outburst flood, but only reduce it. The population also
estimates.
The lack of links to the infrastructure and the difficult
geological profile pose a considerable problem for gla-
ciological studies. What is more, from 1815 to 1945, Nepal
was subject to an entry ban for travellers from outside,
does not consider the technical measures to be sufficient-
ly effective. Furthermore, people are of the opinion that