5) Little Kona is a small coffee company that is considering entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company's profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price: High Price Kona $2, Brew $3 Enter Little Kona Do Not Enter Kona $0, Brew $7 Does either player in this game have a dominant strategy? Does your answer in part (a) help you figure out what the other player should do? What is the Nash equilibrium? Is there only one? a. b. C. d. Big Brew e. Low Price Kona loses $1 Kona $0 Brew $1 Brew $2 Big Brew threatens Little Kona by saying "If you enter, we are going to set a low price, so you had better stay out." Do you think Little Kona should believe the threat? Why or why not? If the two firms could collude and agree on how to split the total profits, what outcome would they pick?

5) Little Kona is a small coffee company that is considering entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company's profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price: High Price Kona $2, Brew $3 Enter Little Kona Do Not Enter Kona $0, Brew $7 Does either player in this game have a dominant strategy? Does your answer in part (a) help you figure out what the other player should do? What is the Nash equilibrium? Is there only one? a. b. C. d. Big Brew e. Low Price Kona loses $1 Kona $0 Brew $1 Brew $2 Big Brew threatens Little Kona by saying "If you enter, we are going to set a low price, so you had better stay out." Do you think Little Kona should believe the threat? Why or why not? If the two firms could collude and agree on how to split the total profits, what outcome would they pick?

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305971493

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter17: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

12. An important characteristic of a dominant strategy is that: Select one: a. it is the best strategy to dominate your opponents b. it always leads to a Nash equilibrium where all players equally well off c. it can prevent the game reaching a Nash equilibrium d. it is the best strategy for a player, regardless of whatever strategy the opponent chooses
COUNTRY B HIGH TARIFF LOW TARIFF HIGH TARIFF $1M $1 M $2M, $1.5 M COUNTRY A LOW $1.5 M, $ 2M $3м, $3 м TARIFF 1. What is the dominant strategy for: a. Country A b. Country B Is there an equilibrium dominant strategy for this game? 2. Find the Nash equilibrium a. Outcome = (High, high) b. Outcome = (High. Low) c. Outcome = (Low, high) d. Outcome = (Low, low) 3. What is the Maximin strategy for Country A and Country B? C.
The payoff matrix in the figure to the right shows the payoffs for a pricing game. If you were firm A, which strategy would you choose? Firm A should A. price high because this is their maximin strategy. B. price low because this is their tit-for-tat strategy. C. price high because this is their dominant strategy. D. price low because this is their dominant strategy. E. price low because this maximizes profits of both firms. Firm B's dominant strategy is to price If this game were repeated a large number of times and you were firm A and you could change your strategy, what might you do? Firm A should O A. use a tit-for-tat strategy by responding in kind to firm B's play. B. use a maximin strategy by maximizing the minimum gain that can be earned. C. use a tit-for-tat strategy by selecting a price that minimizes firm B's profits. D. use a maximin strategy by by responding in kind to firm B's play. E. use a tit-for-tat strategy by maximizing the minimum gain that can be earned. C Price…
◄ Search 12:47 PM Sun Nov 12 ← Note Nov 12, 2023 Uptown's price strategy The Nash equilibrium occurs when High Low LED RareAir's price strategy High $12 $15 The more favorable outcome would be for $12 Tt ✪ $6 B Low $6 D $8. $15 $8 S O both firms have an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell A. 92% neither firm has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell D. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell B. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell C. O the firms to collude and use the high-price strategy but this strategy requires cooperation. O one firm to take the lead and let the…
15. Consider two competing firms, JR and OG. Suppose OG produces an estab- lished product and JR can either produce a clone or a differentiated product. If JR produces a clone, OG can either sue JR or not sue it. If JR produces a differentiated product rather than a clone, OG can either buy JR or not buy it. The two firms are in a non-cooperative game whose extensive form is rep- resented in the tree diagram below, where the payoffs on the right represent profits. -1 for OG 1 for JR sue OG don't -2 for OG clone sue 1 for JR JR don't clone 1 for OG -1 for JR buy OG don't buy 2 for OG 0 for JR If the two firms' managers are rational and recognize each other as rational, then (a) JR clones and OG sues (b) JR does not clone and OG buys (c) JR does not clone and OG does not buy (d) JR clones and OG does not sue (e) JR clones and OG sues with probability .5
Consider the following price game: Firm 1 Firm 2 High Low High 20, 20 12, 24 Low 24, 12 14, 14 Remark: In simultaneous move games (games with rows and columns) theconvention is to write the row player’s payoff first and the column player’spayoff second. (a) What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? Recall that for each playeryou should find the best response to each of the opponents’ strategies andunderline the associated payoff. Then look for a cell where both strategiesare best responses to each other. This is a Nash equilibrium. (b) Does either firm have a dominate strategy (a strategy that is always abest response)?
Consider the following simultaneous move game. Two firms are considering where to open their flagship store in a state they are expanding into. After they simultaneously make their decisions, they compete and earn the additional profits (in millions) given in the cell corresponding to the location they both chose. Which of the following statements is true.
Solve for the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) in each of the following games. (a) The following two-by-two game is a little harder to solve since firm 2’spreferred strategy depends of what firm 1 does. But firm 1 has a dominantstrategy so this game has one Nash equilibrium. Firm 2 Launch Don’tFirm 1 Launch 60, -10 100, 0 Don’t 80, 30 120, 0 What is the Nash equilibrium of this simultaneous-move game? (b) What would the outcome of this game be if instead firm 1 moved first and then, after seeing what firm 1 chose, firm 2 chose it strategy? In this case firm 1 doesn’t necessarily need to choose a best response, but firm 2 must choose a best response since it moves second.
28 A payoff matrix shows the payoffs (i.e. bribes) required to government officials for firms undertaking specific actions. A details the actions each firm takes. shows the payoffs to each firm for each possible outcome. is optional in game theory. 29 A player's best response is the strategy that maximizes his payoff given what he thinks the other player will do. a dominant strategy. A В impossible to find when there isn't a Nash equilibrium. a way to avoid the prisoners' dilemma. D 30 Strategic advertising in the cola market significantly expands the size of the market. brings in few new customers and primarily shifts market share among A В rivals. shifts market demand to the right, increasing quantity sold and decreasing prices. has no impact on the market. C D B.
4. Boeing and Airbus, change in profits ($m) from the development of a super jumbo jet.AirbusDevelop Do not developBoeing Develop -50, -50 -30, 80Do not develop 80, -30 0, 0a) Identify the key assumption of Game theoryb) What important lesson does game theory reveal about coordination inan oligopoly market?c) In the game above, what is the Nash equilibrium?
Is this strategy a sub-game perfect Nash Equilibrium? Player 2: a c e Player 1: A DE C 2 True False A d B e a 2 1 2 1 A D E חח 0 0 1 F -1 1000
What is the Nash Equilibrium of this game? Firm Develop Don't Develop Don't Develop, Protect O Develop, Don't Protect Protect Don't Develop, Don't Protect O Develop, Protect -3,2 1,1 Government Don't Protect 8,10 0,2