(420 ) (560 ) $ 8,539 $ 7,933 LIFO revaluations decreased $140 million in 20X3, compared with decreases of $169 million in 20X2 and $82 million in 20X1. Included in these changes were decreases of $30 million, $12 million, and $3 million in 20X3, 20X2, and 20X1, respectively, that resulted from lower LIFO inventory levels. There were net cost decreases in each of the last three years. Bourne’s earnings before income taxes were $20.0 billion in 20X3. Assume a 21% marginal tax rate. Required: 1. What are the total cumulative tax savings as of December 31,
Bourne Company (a fictional company) has the following inventory note in its 20X3 annual report.
Bourne Company | |||||||
December 31 | |||||||
($ in millions) | 20X3 | 20X2 | |||||
Raw materials and work in process | $ | 3,943 | $ | 5,870 | |||
Finished goods | 5,016 | 2,623 | |||||
8,959 | 8,493 | ||||||
Less revaluation to LIFO | (420 | ) | (560 | ) | |||
$ | 8,539 | $ | 7,933 | ||||
LIFO revaluations decreased $140 million in 20X3, compared with decreases of $169 million in 20X2 and $82 million in 20X1. Included in these changes were decreases of $30 million, $12 million, and $3 million in 20X3, 20X2, and 20X1, respectively, that resulted from lower LIFO inventory levels. There were net cost decreases in each of the last three years.
Bourne’s earnings before income taxes were $20.0 billion in 20X3. Assume a 21% marginal tax rate.
Required:
1. What are the total cumulative tax savings as of December 31, 20X3, that Bourne has realized as a result of using the LIFO inventory method?
2. What would Bourne’s pre-tax earnings have been in 20X3 if it had been using FIFO?
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps