36. What is the equi valent statement of the conditional: "If three points are non-collinear, then they form a unique plane."? If three points are collinear, then they do not form a unique pla ne. If three points form a unique pla ne, then they are non-collinear. 37. What is the equivalent statement of the converse: "if the Lines do not intersect, then they are parallel. "? If two lines intersect, then they a re paralel. O If two lines are pa ra llel, then they never intersect. 38. What will be the valid conclusion for the given hypothesis: "If m 41+m 2- 90, Then they a re congruent. O Then they a re complementary.
36. What is the equi valent statement of the conditional: "If three points are non-collinear, then they form a unique plane."? If three points are collinear, then they do not form a unique pla ne. If three points form a unique pla ne, then they are non-collinear. 37. What is the equivalent statement of the converse: "if the Lines do not intersect, then they are parallel. "? If two lines intersect, then they a re paralel. O If two lines are pa ra llel, then they never intersect. 38. What will be the valid conclusion for the given hypothesis: "If m 41+m 2- 90, Then they a re congruent. O Then they a re complementary.
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285741550
Author:James Stewart
Publisher:James Stewart
Chapter1: Functions And Models
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RCC: (a) What is a function? What are its domain and range? (b) What is the graph of a function? (c) How...
Related questions
Question
Please answer the three subquestions thank you
Transcribed Image Text:36. what is the equivalent statement of the conditional: "if three points are non-collinear, then
they form a unique plane." "
If three points are collinear, then they do not form a unique pla ne.
If three points form a unique pla ne, then they a re non-collinear.
37, what is the equivalent statement of the converse: "if the Lines do not intersect, then they are
parallel."?
If two lines intersect, then they a re pa ra llel.
If two lines a re pa ra llel, then they never intersect.
38. What will be the valid conclusion for the given hypothesis: "If m 21+ mz 2 = 90,
Then they a re congruent.
Then they a re complementary.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:
9781285741550
Author:
James Stewart
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Thomas' Calculus (14th Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134438986
Author:
Joel R. Hass, Christopher E. Heil, Maurice D. Weir
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134763644
Author:
William L. Briggs, Lyle Cochran, Bernard Gillett, Eric Schulz
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:
9781285741550
Author:
James Stewart
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Thomas' Calculus (14th Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134438986
Author:
Joel R. Hass, Christopher E. Heil, Maurice D. Weir
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134763644
Author:
William L. Briggs, Lyle Cochran, Bernard Gillett, Eric Schulz
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:
9781319050740
Author:
Jon Rogawski, Colin Adams, Robert Franzosa
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Calculus: Early Transcendental Functions
Calculus
ISBN:
9781337552516
Author:
Ron Larson, Bruce H. Edwards
Publisher:
Cengage Learning