3. Examine the results in Table VI. Which t ratio listed in the table had the largest p value? What was the focus of this t-test, and were the results significant? Provide a rationale for your answer.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question

Can you answer #3

MNU © 2020
Page 2 of 3
TABLE VI I Quality of Life Experienced by Women and Men (N= 171)
WOMEN (n = 74)
MEAN (SD)
MEN (n = 97)
MEAN (SD)
TVALUE
(DF = 169)
INSTRUMENTS AND COMPONENTS/SCALES
P VALUE
SF-36 (0 = low QoL, 100 = high QoL)
-2.50
48.5 (5.7)
48.2 (7.6)
51.3 (23.7)
51.1 (7.4)
51.4 (7.5)
58.6 (24.1)
12.6 (23.7)
0.01
The Physical Component Score (PCS)*
The Mental Component Score (MCS)
-2.74
0.007
Physical Functioning (PF)
-1.98
0.049
Role-Physical (RP)
Bodily Pain (BP)
General Health (GH)
4.7 (14.1)
-2.54
0.007
57.6 (26.2)
62.5 (27.3)
0.24
51.1 (17.6)
54.2 (20.1)
0.30
39.8 (19.0)
-2.31
Vitality (VT)
Social Functioning (SF)
47.5 (23.2)
0.02
61.0 (27.4)
66.1 (23.2)
0.19
Role-Emotional (RE)
27.5 (39.5)
37.8 (42.7)
0.11
Mental Health (MH)
62.3 (22.9)
72.7 (20.1)
-3.15
0.002
QLI (0 = low QoL, 30 = high QoL)
Total Scale
20.1 (3.5)
21.2 (3.6)
-2.06
0.04
Health Functioning
17.9 (4.1)
19.3 (4.6)
-1.99
0.049
Socioeconomic
22.6 (3.6)
22.9 (3.7)
0.58
19.6 (4.6)
21.1 (4.3)
26.0 (3.9)
Psychologic/spiritual
-2.10
0.04
Family (N= 69 women and 94 men)
25.6 (4.7)
0.51
*PCS = PF, RP, BP, GH. "MCS = VT, SF, RE, MH. "df = 161. Sdf= 168. Qol = Quality of life; QLI, Quality-of-Life Index-Cardiac Version.
Kristofferzon, M., Löfmark, R., & Carlsson, M. (2005). Perceived coping, social support, and quality of life 1 month after myocardial infarction:
A comparison between Swedish women and men. Heart & Lung, 341). p. 47.
Study Questions
1. t= -1.99 describes the difference between women and men post myocardial infarction (MI) for
what variable?
2. Consider t= -2.74 and t= -2.31. Which calculated t ratio has the smaller p value? Provide a
rationale for your answer.
3. Examine the results in Table VI. Which t ratio listed in the table had the largest p value? What
was the focus of this t-test, and were the results significant? Provide a rationale for your answer.
4. What is df? Why is it important to know the df for a t ratio? How would you calculate the df for a
t-test, and what is the df for this study?
5. What is the cause of an increased risk for Type I errors when t-tests are conducted? How might
researchers eliminate the increased risk for a Type I error in a study?
6. Given the information presented in Table VI, calculate a Bonferroni procedure for this study.
7. Does this study meet the assumptions for the t-test? Provide a rationale for your answer.
8. What sampling method did the researchers use in this study? Provide a rationale for your answer.
9. What level of data is analyzed by means and standard deviations? Is this level of data compatible
with the assumptions for the 1-test? Provide a rationale for your answer.
10. Is the sample size adequate to detect significant differences between the two groups in this study?
Source: Kristofferzon, M., Lofrnark, R., & Carlsson, M. (2005). Perceived coping, social support, and quality of life 1 month
after myocardial infarction: A comparison between Swedish women and men. Heart & Lung. 34(1), 39-50.
MNU © 2020
Page 3 of 3
Transcribed Image Text:MNU © 2020 Page 2 of 3 TABLE VI I Quality of Life Experienced by Women and Men (N= 171) WOMEN (n = 74) MEAN (SD) MEN (n = 97) MEAN (SD) TVALUE (DF = 169) INSTRUMENTS AND COMPONENTS/SCALES P VALUE SF-36 (0 = low QoL, 100 = high QoL) -2.50 48.5 (5.7) 48.2 (7.6) 51.3 (23.7) 51.1 (7.4) 51.4 (7.5) 58.6 (24.1) 12.6 (23.7) 0.01 The Physical Component Score (PCS)* The Mental Component Score (MCS) -2.74 0.007 Physical Functioning (PF) -1.98 0.049 Role-Physical (RP) Bodily Pain (BP) General Health (GH) 4.7 (14.1) -2.54 0.007 57.6 (26.2) 62.5 (27.3) 0.24 51.1 (17.6) 54.2 (20.1) 0.30 39.8 (19.0) -2.31 Vitality (VT) Social Functioning (SF) 47.5 (23.2) 0.02 61.0 (27.4) 66.1 (23.2) 0.19 Role-Emotional (RE) 27.5 (39.5) 37.8 (42.7) 0.11 Mental Health (MH) 62.3 (22.9) 72.7 (20.1) -3.15 0.002 QLI (0 = low QoL, 30 = high QoL) Total Scale 20.1 (3.5) 21.2 (3.6) -2.06 0.04 Health Functioning 17.9 (4.1) 19.3 (4.6) -1.99 0.049 Socioeconomic 22.6 (3.6) 22.9 (3.7) 0.58 19.6 (4.6) 21.1 (4.3) 26.0 (3.9) Psychologic/spiritual -2.10 0.04 Family (N= 69 women and 94 men) 25.6 (4.7) 0.51 *PCS = PF, RP, BP, GH. "MCS = VT, SF, RE, MH. "df = 161. Sdf= 168. Qol = Quality of life; QLI, Quality-of-Life Index-Cardiac Version. Kristofferzon, M., Löfmark, R., & Carlsson, M. (2005). Perceived coping, social support, and quality of life 1 month after myocardial infarction: A comparison between Swedish women and men. Heart & Lung, 341). p. 47. Study Questions 1. t= -1.99 describes the difference between women and men post myocardial infarction (MI) for what variable? 2. Consider t= -2.74 and t= -2.31. Which calculated t ratio has the smaller p value? Provide a rationale for your answer. 3. Examine the results in Table VI. Which t ratio listed in the table had the largest p value? What was the focus of this t-test, and were the results significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. 4. What is df? Why is it important to know the df for a t ratio? How would you calculate the df for a t-test, and what is the df for this study? 5. What is the cause of an increased risk for Type I errors when t-tests are conducted? How might researchers eliminate the increased risk for a Type I error in a study? 6. Given the information presented in Table VI, calculate a Bonferroni procedure for this study. 7. Does this study meet the assumptions for the t-test? Provide a rationale for your answer. 8. What sampling method did the researchers use in this study? Provide a rationale for your answer. 9. What level of data is analyzed by means and standard deviations? Is this level of data compatible with the assumptions for the 1-test? Provide a rationale for your answer. 10. Is the sample size adequate to detect significant differences between the two groups in this study? Source: Kristofferzon, M., Lofrnark, R., & Carlsson, M. (2005). Perceived coping, social support, and quality of life 1 month after myocardial infarction: A comparison between Swedish women and men. Heart & Lung. 34(1), 39-50. MNU © 2020 Page 3 of 3
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Discrete Probability Distributions
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman