3. Consider the consumer optimization problem subject to max a In(x) + 3 ln(y) P₂x +Pyy ≤w. r, y> 0. (a) Write the Lagrangean for the problem noting that the non-negativity con- straint cannot bind since z, y> 0 and write the Kuhn-Tucker conditions for the problem. subject to (b) Argue that the budget constraint is binding and solve the problem. (c) Add a third good to the model so that the new problem becomes: max a ln(x + 2) + 3 ln(y +2) z.y. P₂x +Pyy + P₂² ≤w, x, y, z ≥ 0, where you can define In(0) =-∞o. Argue that if := 0 at optimum, then a > 0 and y> 0. (d) Is it possible to have at optimum z>0, y > 0, z > 0? (e) When is z = 0 at optimum?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
Economics
3. Consider the consumer optimization problem
max a In(x) + Bln(y)
subject to
Pza + Pyy <w.
r, y > 0.
(a) Write the Lagrangean for the problem noting that the non-negativity con-
straint cannot bind since a, y > 0 and write the Kuhn-Tucker conditions for
the problem.
(b) Argue that the budget constraint is binding and solve the problem.
(c) Add a third good z to the model so that the new problem becomes:
max a In(r + 2) +3 In(y+2)
subject to
Pza + Pyy + P:z < w,
1, y, : 2 0,
where you can define In(0) = -0. Argue that if z = 0 at optimum, then r > 0
and y > 0.
(d) Is it possible to have at optimum r > 0, y > 0, z > 0?
(e) When is z = 0 at optimum?
Transcribed Image Text:Economics 3. Consider the consumer optimization problem max a In(x) + Bln(y) subject to Pza + Pyy <w. r, y > 0. (a) Write the Lagrangean for the problem noting that the non-negativity con- straint cannot bind since a, y > 0 and write the Kuhn-Tucker conditions for the problem. (b) Argue that the budget constraint is binding and solve the problem. (c) Add a third good z to the model so that the new problem becomes: max a In(r + 2) +3 In(y+2) subject to Pza + Pyy + P:z < w, 1, y, : 2 0, where you can define In(0) = -0. Argue that if z = 0 at optimum, then r > 0 and y > 0. (d) Is it possible to have at optimum r > 0, y > 0, z > 0? (e) When is z = 0 at optimum?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 6 steps with 25 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Partial Derivatives
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education