2. The University of California at Berkeley was charged with having discriminated against women in their graduate admissions process for the fall quarter of 1973. The table below identifies the number of acceptances and denials for both men and women applicants in each of the six largest graduate programs at the institution at that time. Program A Program B Program C Program D Program E Program F Total Men accepted Men denied Women accepted Women denied 511 314 352 208 120 205 137 270 53 138 22 351 89 17 202 132 95 24 19 8 391 243 298 317 a. Start by ignoring the program distinction, collapsing the data into a two-way table of gender by admission status. Admitted Denied Total Men Women Total Of the men who applied into one of the programs, what proportion were admitted? What proportion were denied? Program A Program B Program C Program D Program E Program F Of the women who applied to one of the programs, what proportion were admitted? What proportion were denied? P VE 27 Do these proportions seem to support the claim that men were given preferential 196 treatment in admission decisions? yes b. Compute the proportions of men admitted to each program and the proportions of women admitted to each program. Proportion of men admitted Proportion of women admitted 879 Does it seem as if any one program is responsible for the large discrepancy between men and women in the overall proportions admitted? Explain.
2. The University of California at Berkeley was charged with having discriminated against women in their graduate admissions process for the fall quarter of 1973. The table below identifies the number of acceptances and denials for both men and women applicants in each of the six largest graduate programs at the institution at that time. Program A Program B Program C Program D Program E Program F Total Men accepted Men denied Women accepted Women denied 511 314 352 208 120 205 137 270 53 138 22 351 89 17 202 132 95 24 19 8 391 243 298 317 a. Start by ignoring the program distinction, collapsing the data into a two-way table of gender by admission status. Admitted Denied Total Men Women Total Of the men who applied into one of the programs, what proportion were admitted? What proportion were denied? Program A Program B Program C Program D Program E Program F Of the women who applied to one of the programs, what proportion were admitted? What proportion were denied? P VE 27 Do these proportions seem to support the claim that men were given preferential 196 treatment in admission decisions? yes b. Compute the proportions of men admitted to each program and the proportions of women admitted to each program. Proportion of men admitted Proportion of women admitted 879 Does it seem as if any one program is responsible for the large discrepancy between men and women in the overall proportions admitted? Explain.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
Can you please answer the question below, including all parts in a and b. Thank you.
Transcribed Image Text:2. The University of California at Berkeley was charged with having discriminated
against women in their graduate admissions process for the fall quarter of 1973. The
table below identifies the number of acceptances and denials for both men and women
applicants in each of the six largest graduate programs at the institution at that time.
Program A
Program B
Program C
Program D
Program E
Program F
Total
Men accepted Men denied Women accepted Women denied
511
314
352
208
120
137
2532
205
270
138
351
Program A
Program B
Program C
Program D
Program E
Program F
a. Start by ignoring the program distinction, collapsing the data into a two-way table of
gender by admission status.
Admitted Denied Total
TEME
111259
89
17
202
132
95
24
19
8
391
243
298
317
Men
Women
Total
Of the men who applied into one of the programs, what proportion were admitted?
What proportion were denied? Demoran
Of the women who applied to one of the programs, what proportion were admitted?
What proportion were denied? P
DE 272
Do these proportions seem to support the claim that men were given preferential
treatment in admission decisions?
b. Compute the proportions of men admitted to each program and the proportions of
women admitted to each program.
Proportion of men admitted
320/325
132/467
Proportion of women admitted
SAY
201
Does it seem as if any one program is responsible for the large discrepancy between
men and women in the overall proportions admitted? Explain.
No, Trecam
SCH
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 15 images
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman