2. Given: ZA S ZD ZA is supp. to ZB A Conclusion: ZB is supp. to ZD Reason: 8

Q: 1 2 3 6 7 8 p → 9 p V q pV q p → r קר p -r :. p V q pnq For each of the following arguments identify…

A: Since you have posted a question with multiple subparts according to guildlines I will solve first…

Q: Consider the following premises: • PV q Then the valid conclusion is

A: Given, 1. p∨q2. p→m   Using Modus ponens on (2) 3. m

Q: 8. For each of the following arguments, construct a proof of the conclusion from the given premises,…

A: d. (AvB) D ~C, (CvD), A .. D1. (AvB) D ~C (premise)2. CvD (premise)3. A (premise)4. AvB (disjunction…

Q: determine if the statements (pV ~ q) Λ (~ p V q) and (p → q) Λ (q → P) are logically equivalnet?

A:

Q: Show that the arguments form with the following premises • (p A t) → (r V s) • q → (u ^ t) • u → p…

A: Given premises are p∧t→r∨s q→u∧t u→p ¬s q

Q: Let P be the statement: "For all a, b, c € Z, if ged(a, b) = 1 and c divides a + b, then ged(a, c) =…

A: (a) The statement P says that if a, b, c are three integers such that gcd(a, b) = 1 and c divides a…

Q: Create a proof for the following argument. 1. Av (D v C) 2. -C 3. (A v D) ɔ (B v C) I Bv C

A: We prove the given argument by using rules of inference.

Q: if P(A) = 0.42, P(B) = 0.25, and P(A ∪ B) = 0.61. What is the P(Ā ∩ B)?

A:

Q: 2. Use truth table to show the validity of the given argument form pV ng r V vq * vr

A:

Q: 10.Construct the formal proof of validity for the given argument 1. (D∨ E) ⟶--F 2. G ⟶H 3. F ∨ G…

A: Given that the argument is, 1. (D∨ E) ⟶~F 2. G ⟶H 3. F ∨ G 4. D It is required to construct the…

Q: If P (B) = 1/4, P (A ∪ B) = 1/2 and P (A|B) = 2/3, then which of the following statements is true?…

A: GivenP(B)=14P(A∪B)=12P(A|B)=23

Q: Draw a valid conclusion from the given premises. If Fluffy gets dirty, then she will clean herself.…

A:

Q: The propostions (p → a) →q and q→ (q→ p) are equivalent. Select one: O True False

A: To Find: If the propositions p→q→q and q→q→p are equivalent or not.

Q: if c v r and ~r are both premises? then c must be... true  false  cbd LOGIC

A:

Q: Simplify the following statement: [(p → q) ∨ (q → r)] ∧ (r → s)

A:

Q: (b) p→→q¬qp)

A:

Q: Is the following argument valid? PV q r →=p q r

A: Use the truth table method to check the validity of the argument.