16.4 feet for waves Weatherwise is a magazine published by the American Meteorological Society. One issue gives a rating system used to classify Nor'easter storms that frequently hit New England and can cause much damage near the ocean. A severe storm has an average peak wave height of hitting the shore. Suppose that a Nor'easter is in progress at the severe storm class rating. Peak wave heights are usually measured from land (using binoculars) off fixed cement piers. Suppose that a reading of 34 waves showed an average wave height of x-16.7 feet. Previous studies of severe storms indicate that a 3.5 feet. Does this information suggest that the storm is (perhaps temporarily) increasing above the severe rating? Use a =0.01. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. Ho> 16.4 ft; H₁: -16.4 ft Ho: 16.4 ft; H₁: > 16.4 ft No: 16.4 ft; H₁<16.4 ft Ho: <16.4 ft; H₁: -16.4 ft Ho: 16.4 ft; H₁: 16.4 ft (b) What sampling distribution will you use? Explain the rationale for your choice of sampling distribution. The standard normal, since the sample size is large and is known. The Student's t, since the sample size is large and a is unknown. The Student's t, since the sample size is large and is known. The standard normal, since the sample size is large and a is unknown. Compute the appropriate sampling distribution value of the sample test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) (c) Estimate the P-value. P-value>0.250 0.100 < P-value < 0.250 0.050 P-value <0.100 0.010 < P-value < 0.050 P-value < 0.010 Sketch the sampling distribution and show the area corresponding to the P-value. 3 -2 -10 (d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Are the data statistically significant at level a? At the a=0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant. At the -0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant. At the -0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant. At the a 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant. (e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application. There is sufficient evidence at the 0.01 level to conclude that the storm is increasing above the severe rating. There is insufficient evidence at the 0.01 level to conclude that the storm is increasing above the severe rating.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
Weatherwise is a magazine published by the American Meteorological Society. One issue gives a rating system used to classify Nor'easter storms that frequently hit New England and can cause much damage near the ocean. A severe storm has an average peak wave height of u = 16.4 feet for waves hitting the shore. Suppose that a Nor'easter is in progress at the severe storm class rating. Peak wave heights are usually measured from land (using binoculars) off fixed cement piers. Suppose that a reading of 34 waves showed an average wave height of x = 16.7 feet. Previous studies of severe storms indicate that o = 3.5 feet. Does this information suggest that the storm is (perhaps temporarily) increasing above the severe rating? Use a = 0.01.
16.4 feet for waves
Weatherwise is a magazine published by the American Meteorological Society. One issue gives a rating system used to classify Nor'easter storms that frequently hit New England and can cause much damage near the ocean. A severe storm has an average peak wave height of
hitting the shore. Suppose that a Nor'easter is in progress at the severe storm class rating. Peak wave heights are usually measured from land (using binoculars) off fixed cement piers. Suppose that a reading of 34 waves showed an average wave height of x-16.7 feet. Previous studies of severe
storms indicate that a 3.5 feet. Does this information suggest that the storm is (perhaps temporarily) increasing above the severe rating? Use a =0.01.
(a) What is the level of significance?
State the null and alternate hypotheses.
Ho> 16.4 ft; H₁:
-16.4 ft
Ho:
16.4 ft; H₁: > 16.4 ft
No:
16.4 ft; H₁<16.4 ft
Ho:
<16.4 ft; H₁:
-16.4 ft
Ho:
16.4 ft; H₁:
16.4 ft
(b) What sampling distribution will you use? Explain the rationale for your choice of sampling distribution.
The standard normal, since the sample size is large and is known.
The Student's t, since the sample size is large and a is unknown.
The Student's t, since the sample size is large and is known.
The standard normal, since the sample size is large and a is unknown.
Compute the appropriate sampling distribution value of the sample test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
(c) Estimate the P-value.
P-value>0.250
0.100 < P-value < 0.250
0.050 P-value <0.100
0.010 < P-value < 0.050
P-value < 0.010
Sketch the sampling distribution and show the area corresponding to the P-value.
3
-2 -10
(d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Are the data statistically significant at level a?
At the a=0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.
At the -0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.
At the -0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.
At the a 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.
(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application.
There is sufficient evidence at the 0.01 level to conclude that the storm is increasing above the severe rating.
There is insufficient evidence at the 0.01 level to conclude that the storm is increasing above the severe rating.
Transcribed Image Text:16.4 feet for waves Weatherwise is a magazine published by the American Meteorological Society. One issue gives a rating system used to classify Nor'easter storms that frequently hit New England and can cause much damage near the ocean. A severe storm has an average peak wave height of hitting the shore. Suppose that a Nor'easter is in progress at the severe storm class rating. Peak wave heights are usually measured from land (using binoculars) off fixed cement piers. Suppose that a reading of 34 waves showed an average wave height of x-16.7 feet. Previous studies of severe storms indicate that a 3.5 feet. Does this information suggest that the storm is (perhaps temporarily) increasing above the severe rating? Use a =0.01. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. Ho> 16.4 ft; H₁: -16.4 ft Ho: 16.4 ft; H₁: > 16.4 ft No: 16.4 ft; H₁<16.4 ft Ho: <16.4 ft; H₁: -16.4 ft Ho: 16.4 ft; H₁: 16.4 ft (b) What sampling distribution will you use? Explain the rationale for your choice of sampling distribution. The standard normal, since the sample size is large and is known. The Student's t, since the sample size is large and a is unknown. The Student's t, since the sample size is large and is known. The standard normal, since the sample size is large and a is unknown. Compute the appropriate sampling distribution value of the sample test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) (c) Estimate the P-value. P-value>0.250 0.100 < P-value < 0.250 0.050 P-value <0.100 0.010 < P-value < 0.050 P-value < 0.010 Sketch the sampling distribution and show the area corresponding to the P-value. 3 -2 -10 (d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Are the data statistically significant at level a? At the a=0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant. At the -0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant. At the -0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant. At the a 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant. (e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application. There is sufficient evidence at the 0.01 level to conclude that the storm is increasing above the severe rating. There is insufficient evidence at the 0.01 level to conclude that the storm is increasing above the severe rating.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman