10:19 • M +1 (868) 271-2917 May 7, 9:20 AM All 52% Norwegian Salmon Processing Facility, Trondheim NorSal Trondheim operates a salmon processing facility where fish are purchased from local sources along the North Sea, processed at the facility, and sold to customers for distribution. The plant man- ager, Inger Hansen, is contemplating a plant modernization to upgrade the technology in the plant. While the plant performs well enough now, modernizing equipment would allow the plant to increase capacity per hour, which is particularly advantageous because the factory has enough demand to cover the additional capacity. Currently, the plant operates five days a week, in two shifts of 30 workers per shift. The workers are paid $10 per hour. Adding a third shift is not possible because the plant is cleaned during the third shift. The firm is contemplating a plant modernization to upgrade existing equipment, which should increase the plant's output while lowering energy costs. Using the current equipment, around 1,500 pounds of salmon can be processed each hour, while the new plant would be able to process 2,000 pounds per hour. The updated equip- ment is made by the same manufacturer as the existing equipment, and the production personnel feel that they will be able to learn to use the new equipment quickly. For this reason, costs to train per- sonnel are assumed to be negligible. The production manager, Bjorn Pedersen, is skeptical about undergoing the plant modernization. The older equipment, he argues, is already paid for, and new equip ment would cost $10,000 per week. This cost is comprised of both principal and interest, and includes manufacturer installation of the equipment. The controller, Maret Karlsen, cautions that all deci- sions related to costs should be included in the analysis and that because the energy consumption would be different, this must also be accounted for in the decision. Energy costs are presently $10 per unit, and the existing plant uses 1,000 units of energy per week. With the modernized plant, the consumption of energy would fall by 50%. Discussion Questions 1. What is the productivity of the processing facility, with the equipment currently in use? 2. What would the productivity of the plant become if the new sys- tem were purchased and implemented? 3. What would be the amount of additional expense on equipment that would make productivity of the two systems equal? 4. What might happen if energy costs increase in the future? Activate Windows Good morning. A more legible copy of the group case study is provided.
10:19 • M +1 (868) 271-2917 May 7, 9:20 AM All 52% Norwegian Salmon Processing Facility, Trondheim NorSal Trondheim operates a salmon processing facility where fish are purchased from local sources along the North Sea, processed at the facility, and sold to customers for distribution. The plant man- ager, Inger Hansen, is contemplating a plant modernization to upgrade the technology in the plant. While the plant performs well enough now, modernizing equipment would allow the plant to increase capacity per hour, which is particularly advantageous because the factory has enough demand to cover the additional capacity. Currently, the plant operates five days a week, in two shifts of 30 workers per shift. The workers are paid $10 per hour. Adding a third shift is not possible because the plant is cleaned during the third shift. The firm is contemplating a plant modernization to upgrade existing equipment, which should increase the plant's output while lowering energy costs. Using the current equipment, around 1,500 pounds of salmon can be processed each hour, while the new plant would be able to process 2,000 pounds per hour. The updated equip- ment is made by the same manufacturer as the existing equipment, and the production personnel feel that they will be able to learn to use the new equipment quickly. For this reason, costs to train per- sonnel are assumed to be negligible. The production manager, Bjorn Pedersen, is skeptical about undergoing the plant modernization. The older equipment, he argues, is already paid for, and new equip ment would cost $10,000 per week. This cost is comprised of both principal and interest, and includes manufacturer installation of the equipment. The controller, Maret Karlsen, cautions that all deci- sions related to costs should be included in the analysis and that because the energy consumption would be different, this must also be accounted for in the decision. Energy costs are presently $10 per unit, and the existing plant uses 1,000 units of energy per week. With the modernized plant, the consumption of energy would fall by 50%. Discussion Questions 1. What is the productivity of the processing facility, with the equipment currently in use? 2. What would the productivity of the plant become if the new sys- tem were purchased and implemented? 3. What would be the amount of additional expense on equipment that would make productivity of the two systems equal? 4. What might happen if energy costs increase in the future? Activate Windows Good morning. A more legible copy of the group case study is provided.
Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...
Related questions
Question

Transcribed Image Text:10:19 • M
+1 (868) 271-2917
May 7, 9:20 AM
All 52%
Norwegian Salmon Processing Facility, Trondheim
NorSal Trondheim operates a salmon processing facility where fish
are purchased from local sources along the North Sea, processed at
the facility, and sold to customers for distribution. The plant man-
ager, Inger Hansen, is contemplating a plant modernization to
upgrade the technology in the plant. While the plant performs well
enough now, modernizing equipment would allow the plant to
increase capacity per hour, which is particularly advantageous
because the factory has enough demand to cover the additional
capacity. Currently, the plant operates five days a week, in two shifts
of 30 workers per shift. The workers are paid $10 per hour. Adding
a third shift is not possible because the plant is cleaned during the
third shift.
The firm is contemplating a plant modernization to upgrade
existing equipment, which should increase the plant's output while
lowering energy costs. Using the current equipment, around 1,500
pounds of salmon can be processed each hour, while the new plant
would be able to process 2,000 pounds per hour. The updated equip-
ment is made by the same manufacturer as the existing equipment,
and the production personnel feel that they will be able to learn to
use the new equipment quickly. For this reason, costs to train per-
sonnel are assumed to be negligible. The production manager, Bjorn
Pedersen, is skeptical about undergoing the plant modernization.
The older equipment, he argues, is already paid for, and new equip
ment would cost $10,000 per week. This cost is comprised of both
principal and interest, and includes manufacturer installation of the
equipment. The controller, Maret Karlsen, cautions that all deci-
sions related to costs should be included in the analysis and that
because the energy consumption would be different, this must also
be accounted for in the decision. Energy costs are presently $10 per
unit, and the existing plant uses 1,000 units of energy per week.
With the modernized plant, the consumption of energy would fall
by 50%.
Discussion Questions
1. What is the productivity of the processing facility, with the
equipment currently in use?
2. What would the productivity of the plant become if the new sys-
tem were purchased and implemented?
3. What would be the amount of additional expense on equipment
that would make productivity of the two systems equal?
4. What might happen if energy costs increase in the future?
Activate Windows
Good morning. A more legible copy of
the group case study is provided.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps

Recommended textbooks for you

Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,

Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,

Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education


Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781478623069
Author:
Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:
Waveland Press, Inc.