1.5. Consider the following two finite versions of the Cournot duopoly model. First, suppose each firm must choose either half the monopoly quantity, qm/2 = (a - c)/4, or the Cournot equilib- rium quantity, qc (ac)/3. No other quantities are feasible. Show that this two-action game is equivalent to the Prisoners' Dilemma: each firm has a strictly dominated strategy, and both are worse off in equilibrium than they would be if they cooper- ated. Second, suppose each firm can choose either qm/2, or qc, or a third quantity, q'. Find a value for q' such that the game is equivalent to the Cournot model in Section 1.2.A, in the sense that (qc, qc) is a unique Nash equilibrium and both firms are worse off in equilibrium than they could be if they cooperated, but neither firm has a strictly dominated strategy.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
In the Cournot duopoly model, the analogous statement is that
the quantity pair (q₁,q) is a Nash equilibrium if, for each firm i,
q solves
max Ti(9₁,9₁)
0<9;<∞0
and
=
*
Assuming q <a − c (as will be shown to be true), the first-order
condition for firm i's optimization problem is both necessary and
sufficient; it yields
qi =
(1.2.1)
Thus, if the quantity pair (q†,92) is to be a Nash equilibrium, the
firms' quantity choices must satisfy
max qila - (qi+q₁) - c].
0<qi<∞0
92
1
-
2
1
q† = z (a − q ₂ − c )
2
(a - q - c).
1
-
₂ (a − 9₁ - c).
Solving this pair of equations yields
a C
91 = 92
gì =q2=ng?
3
Transcribed Image Text:In the Cournot duopoly model, the analogous statement is that the quantity pair (q₁,q) is a Nash equilibrium if, for each firm i, q solves max Ti(9₁,9₁) 0<9;<∞0 and = * Assuming q <a − c (as will be shown to be true), the first-order condition for firm i's optimization problem is both necessary and sufficient; it yields qi = (1.2.1) Thus, if the quantity pair (q†,92) is to be a Nash equilibrium, the firms' quantity choices must satisfy max qila - (qi+q₁) - c]. 0<qi<∞0 92 1 - 2 1 q† = z (a − q ₂ − c ) 2 (a - q - c). 1 - ₂ (a − 9₁ - c). Solving this pair of equations yields a C 91 = 92 gì =q2=ng? 3
==
1.5. Consider the following two finite versions of the Cournot
duopoly model. First, suppose each firm must choose either half
the monopoly quantity, qm/2 = (a − c)/4, or the Cournot equilib-
rium quantity, qc = (ac)/3. No other quantities are feasible.
Show that this two-action game is equivalent to the Prisoners'
Dilemma: each firm has a strictly dominated strategy, and both
are worse off in equilibrium than they would be if they cooper-
ated. Second, suppose each firm can choose either qm/2, or qc,
or a third quantity, q'. Find a value for q' such that the game is
equivalent to the Cournot model in Section 1.2.A, in the sense that
(qc, qc) is a unique Nash equilibrium and both firms are worse off
in equilibrium than they could be if they cooperated, but neither
firm has a strictly dominated strategy.
Transcribed Image Text:== 1.5. Consider the following two finite versions of the Cournot duopoly model. First, suppose each firm must choose either half the monopoly quantity, qm/2 = (a − c)/4, or the Cournot equilib- rium quantity, qc = (ac)/3. No other quantities are feasible. Show that this two-action game is equivalent to the Prisoners' Dilemma: each firm has a strictly dominated strategy, and both are worse off in equilibrium than they would be if they cooper- ated. Second, suppose each firm can choose either qm/2, or qc, or a third quantity, q'. Find a value for q' such that the game is equivalent to the Cournot model in Section 1.2.A, in the sense that (qc, qc) is a unique Nash equilibrium and both firms are worse off in equilibrium than they could be if they cooperated, but neither firm has a strictly dominated strategy.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 80 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Cartel
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education