1. What is a fact? How are scientific facts established? 2. Does this section’s blog post reflect scientific facts, unwarranted opinions, or anecdotes? Provide specific examples of each in the post if you find them. 3. Does the blog post emphasize villains, victims, and heroes? If so, identify and list them. 4. Identify one to two statements in the blog post that you can refute using scientific data from Table 2. Provide details/data from the table to support your repudiation. 5. Speculate on the validity of the following statement from the post: “Our babies would be protected from many/ most infectious diseases if their mothers were allowed to have natural immunity and pass it to their babies in breast milk, and we had true herd immunity through adults who had life-long natural immunity.” 6. To develop “natural” immunity as described by the poster, one would likely need to develop an infectious disease. Discuss/brainstorm ideas concerning the public health and economic implications of treating disease in the population versus vaccinating the population. 7 / 972%+ |Part IV – It's About the Herd-In response to the 2014-2015 measles "outbreak" in California that originated in Disneyland, Governor JerryBrown signed a bill (SB 277) that "eliminates religious and philosophical exemptions" to required schoolvaccines. Consequently, only documented health objections are accepted to opt-out of childhood vaccinesrequired for admission to public school in California. Home schooled students remain exempt. Duringdeliberation of the bill, vaccine compliance supporters found a good example for their cause, seven-year-oldRhett Krawitt, a leukemia patient who was not able to be protected through routine vaccination because of hisweakened immune system. Ryan's parents boldly asked school authorities to ban unvaccinated children fromschool attendance because they posed a threat to Rhett's health.The entire family later testified in support of SB 277.6Rhett Krawitt's situation emphasized that the community should not only be concerned about individualchildren and vaccine preventable disease but also about members of the community who need to be protectedbut can't receive vaccination. If a majority (for measles it is 95% but the percentage differs for various infectiousdiseases) of a population is vaccinated, infectious agents cannot find susceptible hosts, thus outbreaks typicallydie out in a short time frame and morbidity and mortality are kept low. This is known as herd immunity (alsocalled community immunity).But social media posts reveal that not everyone agrees on or accepts the important role of herd immunity, asstrongly stated in the blog post below.The fact is that CDC works for big pharma/special interests not public safety as the CDC whistle blower documentsprove. The fact is that this is about money not public safety. The fact is that some of these vaccines have littlebenefit/effectiveness and serious risks. The fact is real natural immunity and vaccine derived immunity are not thesame thing at all and our babies would be protected from many/most infectious diseases if their mothers wereallowed to have natural immunity and pass it to their babies in breast milk, and we had true herd im- munitythrough adults who had life- long natural immunity. The fact is vaccine induced immunity typically does not holdfor long and often misses the target, and the neurotoxins and foreign ingredients/DNA, etc. are causing ageneration of allergic/arthritic/immune system damaged children and adults. The fact is immunocompromisedchildren can die from cold or flu viruses and bacteria so there is always risk when they leave their homes and gointo a school/ public setting and no amount of vaccination will remove those risks. -Aug 20157Let's consider the above post in the context of previously presented information and Table 2, which displaysinformation on vaccine efficacy in Great Britain (England and Wales).Table 2. Impact of Selected Vaccine Introduction on Disease Incidence in Great Britain!Pre-vaccineCasesVaccine Introduc-Cases 201496 ReductionLocationDisease8.tion Year5 92305077 / 972%+-Part -What le a Vaccine and What is inTable 2. Impact of Selected Vaccine Introduction on Disease Incidence in Great Britain'.Pre-vaccineCases?Vaccine Introduc-Cases 201496 ReductionLocationDiseasetion Year50,804199.9%Eng./Wales1942DiphtheriaPertussis92,4073,50696.0%Eng.Wales19571968Measles460,40713099.9%Eng.Wales1992Haemophilus influenzae B infection8621299.0%Eng.1999Group Cinvasive meningococcal disease8832897.0%Eng.2006Invasive pneumococcal disease3,55285876.0%Eng./Wales"Souce: Vaccine Knowledge Project, Oxford Vaccine Group. Cases per year in the year prior to vaccine introduction.Questions1. What is a fact? How are scientific facts established?6.2. Does this section's blog post reflect scientific facts, unwarranted opinions, or anecdotes? Provide specificexamples of each in the post if you find them.3. Does the blog post emphasize villains, victims, and heroes? If so, identify and list them.74. Identify one to two statements in the blog post that you can refute using scientific data from Table 2. Providedetails/data from the table to support your repudiation.5. Speculate on the validity of the following statement from the post: "Our babies would be protected frommany/ most infectious diseases if their mothers were allowed to have natural immunity and pass it to theirbabies in breast milk, and we had true herd immunity through adults who had life-long natural immunity."6. To develop “natural" immunity as described by the poster, one would likely need to develop an infectiousdisease. Discuss/brainstorm ideas concerning the public health and economic implications of treating disease inthe population versus vaccinating the population.8

Solution 1): Facts are classified as the real occurrence of any scenario that aspires to be a clause…

Answered: 1. What is a fact? How are scientific…

Social Psychology (10th Edition)

10th Edition

ISBN:9780134641287

Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers

Publisher:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers

Chapter1: Introducing Social Psychology

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ1

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

100%

1. What is a fact? How are scientific facts established? 2. Does this section’s blog post reflect scientific facts, unwarranted opinions, or anecdotes? Provide specific examples of each in the post if you find them. 3. Does the blog post emphasize villains, victims, and heroes? If so, identify and list them. 4. Identify one to two statements in the blog post that you can refute using scientific data from Table 2. Provide details/data from the table to support your repudiation. 5. Speculate on the validity of the following statement from the post: “Our babies would be protected from many/ most infectious diseases if their mothers were allowed to have natural immunity and pass it to their babies in breast milk, and we had true herd immunity through adults who had life-long natural immunity.” 6. To develop “natural” immunity as described by the poster, one would likely need to develop an infectious disease. Discuss/brainstorm ideas concerning the public health and economic implications of treating disease in the population versus vaccinating the population.