1. Was there any item on the VRAG-R that surprised you? 2. Given that a higher score means that the individual was more likely to commit another violent act if released, were the way that some of the items were score (with respect to what increased or decreased scores) that was surprising? 3. What new factors do you think should be added to the VRAG-R? Please come up with at least two. 4. The VRAG-R feels cold and emotionless... that is because it is all math and no emotion. It also feels a bit strange because there is no way for anyone to "get better." This means that once you get a score, your score cannot go down since all of the factors are based on historical events, not things you have done since then. Do you think the fact that the VRAG-R focuses solely on historical events if fair? Even if the statistical analysis is solid?

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
5th Edition
ISBN:9780134477961
Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Chapter1: The Science Of Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1TY
icon
Related questions
Question
1. Was there any item on the VRAG-R that surprised you?
2. Given that a higher score means that the individual was
more likely to commit another violent act if released, were
the way that some of the items were score (with respect to
what increased or decreased scores) that was surprising?
3. What new factors do you think should be added to the
VRAG-R? Please come up with at least two.
4. The VRAG-R feels cold and emotionless... that is because it
is all math and no emotion. It also feels a bit strange
because there is no way for anyone to "get better." This
means that once you get a score, your score cannot go
down since all of the factors are based on historical events,
not things you have done since then. Do you think the fact
that the VRAG-R focuses solely on historical events if fair?
Even if the statistical analysis is solid?
Transcribed Image Text:1. Was there any item on the VRAG-R that surprised you? 2. Given that a higher score means that the individual was more likely to commit another violent act if released, were the way that some of the items were score (with respect to what increased or decreased scores) that was surprising? 3. What new factors do you think should be added to the VRAG-R? Please come up with at least two. 4. The VRAG-R feels cold and emotionless... that is because it is all math and no emotion. It also feels a bit strange because there is no way for anyone to "get better." This means that once you get a score, your score cannot go down since all of the factors are based on historical events, not things you have done since then. Do you think the fact that the VRAG-R focuses solely on historical events if fair? Even if the statistical analysis is solid?
Make sure to download the "Violence Risk Appraisal Guide" –
Revised VRAG-R" so that you can view it: Review the VRAG
and score it based on your own personal history... essentially,
use yourself as the "inmate" in this instance.
Scoring is simple. Start at a score of "0" and either add (or
remove) Points based in your answers to the questions. The
scoring is different for every question. For example, for
question #1) If you lived with both of your parents then subtract
2 points (giving you a score of -2). IF your parents were
divorced before you were 16 years old, add 2 points (giving you
an overall score of 2). Then rinse and repeat for the remainder
of the questions. Forget about question 12, since you cannot
score the Psychopathy Checklist (and you would all likely score
very low in this item).
Overall, a higher score results in more risk of violent
recidivism.
Transcribed Image Text:Make sure to download the "Violence Risk Appraisal Guide" – Revised VRAG-R" so that you can view it: Review the VRAG and score it based on your own personal history... essentially, use yourself as the "inmate" in this instance. Scoring is simple. Start at a score of "0" and either add (or remove) Points based in your answers to the questions. The scoring is different for every question. For example, for question #1) If you lived with both of your parents then subtract 2 points (giving you a score of -2). IF your parents were divorced before you were 16 years old, add 2 points (giving you an overall score of 2). Then rinse and repeat for the remainder of the questions. Forget about question 12, since you cannot score the Psychopathy Checklist (and you would all likely score very low in this item). Overall, a higher score results in more risk of violent recidivism.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780134477961
Author:
Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:
PEARSON
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337408271
Author:
Goldstein, E. Bruce.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337565691
Author:
Dennis Coon, John O. Mitterer, Tanya S. Martini
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780393265156
Author:
Sarah Grison, Michael Gazzaniga
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Psychology
ISBN:
9781285763880
Author:
E. Bruce Goldstein
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Psychology
ISBN:
9781305652958
Author:
Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen Schultz
Publisher:
Cengage Learning