1. A company intends to replace equipment that is no longer able to meet its needs. The two best alternatives are to purchase a manual tool (A1) or an automatic tool (A2). The estimated economic consequences of the two alternatives are: A1 A2 Initial investment ($) 28.000 65.000 Annual withdrawal ($) 14.000 9.000 Additional withdrawal every 5 years ($) 14.000 9.000 Lifespan (years) 10 20 Residual value ($) 8.000 13.000 Based on the present worth analysis, with an interest rate of 15% per year, an analysis period of 20 years, and the assumption of recurrence, determine the best alternative that must be chosen using future worth analysis.

1. A company intends to replace equipment that is no longer able to meet its needs. The two best alternatives are to purchase a manual tool (A1) or an automatic tool (A2). The estimated economic consequences of the two alternatives are: A1 A2 Initial investment ($) 28.000 65.000 Annual withdrawal ($) 14.000 9.000 Additional withdrawal every 5 years ($) 14.000 9.000 Lifespan (years) 10 20 Residual value ($) 8.000 13.000 Based on the present worth analysis, with an interest rate of 15% per year, an analysis period of 20 years, and the assumption of recurrence, determine the best alternative that must be chosen using future worth analysis.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Question 6 An engineering company is considering the purchase of one of the following three equipment. The useful life of each alternative is 10 years and the interest rate is 8%. 97552 7550 2158 8162 1550 $135,000 $3,000 $35,750 $59,450 Initial cost 4045 19797 Annual costs Annual benefits Salvage value after 10 years 4517 The incremental benefit-cont ratio of B-A is closeat to: Notes: • Consider the salvage value as benefit. . Round your answer to the nearest three decimal places (ex: 1.374).
1.) What are the 3 assumptions that must be considered when using the LCM approach in comparing PW of differentlife alternatives? Question 2 in image, thank you.
Q1).Using AW method compare between the following alternatives: Operating and maintenance Alt. F.C. Income at the Annual nd S.V. Useful life i. end of 2 yearIncome A 35000 3500 2800 7000 8 8% B. 32000 1500 4700 2500 8%
2 - Calculate the internal rate of return for the following investments: Initial Cost Annual Benefit Answer: 13.30% Operations and Maintenance Overhaul at year 3 Salvage Value Useful Life $-30,000 $10,000 $2,000 $8,000 $8,000 6 years
1. The data for new and used machines are shown below: Initial cost($) Annual operating cost ($/year) Salvage value ($) Life (years) Used machine 15,000 8,000 5,000 3 New machine 40,000 2,000 10,000 6 Using an interest rate of 10% per year, determine the present worth of the new machine.
Demand for a new product will decline as competitors enter the market. If interest is 10%, what is an equivalent uniform value?
A new bridge project is being evaluated at i = 20%. Recommend an alternative based on the capitalized cost for each. AnnualO&M Life(years) $250,000 $500,000 Construction Cost Concrete $50million Steel $40million Solution: 1. Here 2. CC concrete 50 3. CC steel 4. Choose capitalized cost (CC). million dollars; million dollars; 70 50
None
Fitzgerald, Ivy, Garcia, Nichols, Eudy, Williams, Thomas, Owens, and Nagy (FIGNEWTON) Inc. must replace its fig - crushing equipment. The alternatives under consideration are presented below. Alternative First Cost Net Annual Benefits Useful Life A $170, 500 $14, 675 5 years B 205,000 17,000 7 years C 242,500 16, 350 8 years D 290,000 14,825 10 years a) Which anlaysis method should be used to select the alternative? b) Why should that analysis method be used? c) if FIGNEWTON uses a MARR of 8%, what alternative should be chosen? d) if FIGNEWTON uses a MARR of 18%, what alternative should be chosen? Submit one excel file with answers a), b), c) and d) highlighted clearly.
14. TOPIC: ENGINEERING ECONOMICS PLEASE ANSWER IN 4 DECIMAL POINTS
which process line should be built for a new chemical? the expected market for the chemical is 16 years. an 18% rate is used to evaluate new process facilities, which are compared with present worth. how much does the better choice save? First cost O &M cost/year salvage life A $14 M $2.5 M $2 M 8 years B 22 M 3 M 7.5 M 16 years