1 |gn(x) – g(x)| = - |n(1+x²) Thus, given e > 0, we can choose N > 1/e (which does not depend on x), and it follows that n 2N implies Ign(x) – 9(x)| < E for all r e R. By Definition 6.2.3, In +0 uniformly on R. (ii) Look back at Example 6.2.2 (i), where we saw that fn(x) = (x2 + nx)/n converges pointwise on R to f(x) uniform. To see this write = x. On R, the convergence is not x' + nx |fn(x) – f(x)| = and notice that in order to force |fn (x) – f(x)| < e, we are going to have to choose N> Although this is possible to do for each r e R, there is no way to choose a single value of N that will work for all values of x at the same time. On the other hand, we can show that fn + f uniformly on the set [-b, b]. By restricting our attention to a bounded interval, we may now assert that Given e > 0, then, we can choose N > independently of x E [-b, b]. Graphically speaking, the uniform convergence of fn to a limit f on a set A can be visualized by constructing a band of radius ±e around the limit func- tion f. If fn + f uniformly, then there exists a point in the sequence after which each fn is completely contained in this e-strip (Fig. 6.4). This image should be compared with the graphs in Figures 6.1-6.2 from Example 6.2.2 and the one in Figure 6.5. VI

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question

(i) Let gn(x) =1/n(1 + x2) For any fixed x ∈ R, we can see that limgn(x) = 0 so that g(x) = 0 is the pointwise limit of the sequence (gn) on R. Is this convergence uniform? The observation that 1/(1 + x2) ≤ 1 for all x ∈ R implies that 
.

1
|gn(x) – g(x)| =
-
|n(1+x²)
Thus, given e > 0, we can choose N >
1/e (which does not depend on x),
and it follows that
n 2N implies Ign(x) – 9(x)| < E
for all r e R. By Definition 6.2.3, In +0 uniformly on R.
(ii) Look back at Example 6.2.2 (i), where we saw that fn(x) = (x2 + nx)/n
converges pointwise on R to f(x)
uniform. To see this write
= x. On R, the convergence is not
x' + nx
|fn(x) – f(x)| =
and notice that in order to force |fn (x) – f(x)| < e, we are going to have
to choose
N>
Transcribed Image Text:1 |gn(x) – g(x)| = - |n(1+x²) Thus, given e > 0, we can choose N > 1/e (which does not depend on x), and it follows that n 2N implies Ign(x) – 9(x)| < E for all r e R. By Definition 6.2.3, In +0 uniformly on R. (ii) Look back at Example 6.2.2 (i), where we saw that fn(x) = (x2 + nx)/n converges pointwise on R to f(x) uniform. To see this write = x. On R, the convergence is not x' + nx |fn(x) – f(x)| = and notice that in order to force |fn (x) – f(x)| < e, we are going to have to choose N>
Although this is possible to do for each r e R, there is no way to choose
a single value of N that will work for all values of x at the same time.
On the other hand, we can show that fn + f uniformly on the set [-b, b].
By restricting our attention to a bounded interval, we may now assert that
Given e > 0, then, we can choose
N >
independently of x E [-b, b].
Graphically speaking, the uniform convergence of fn to a limit f on a set
A can be visualized by constructing a band of radius ±e around the limit func-
tion f. If fn + f uniformly, then there exists a point in the sequence after which
each fn is completely contained in this e-strip (Fig. 6.4). This image should be
compared with the graphs in Figures 6.1-6.2 from Example 6.2.2 and the one
in Figure 6.5.
VI
Transcribed Image Text:Although this is possible to do for each r e R, there is no way to choose a single value of N that will work for all values of x at the same time. On the other hand, we can show that fn + f uniformly on the set [-b, b]. By restricting our attention to a bounded interval, we may now assert that Given e > 0, then, we can choose N > independently of x E [-b, b]. Graphically speaking, the uniform convergence of fn to a limit f on a set A can be visualized by constructing a band of radius ±e around the limit func- tion f. If fn + f uniformly, then there exists a point in the sequence after which each fn is completely contained in this e-strip (Fig. 6.4). This image should be compared with the graphs in Figures 6.1-6.2 from Example 6.2.2 and the one in Figure 6.5. VI
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Sequence
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,