cay Yea -Year- 7 measure of how cach vibration period ratio between 2 amplitude eab Juhtp E ແວວນເອິນ 1597 - 0% 13% Carbohydrate 350 Robes ray Added Sugars 58% Protale 00 seconds, control system B has 4 oscillations (1.33 Hz), whereas A has only 3 oscillations (1 Hz). Amplitude at 3 sec can be calculated by multiplying the initial displacement by the appropriate number of decay ratios, that is (d) Discuss how increasing ka and kp affect period of vibration and decay ratio. Effect: Increasing ka slightly increases the period of vibration (7period). Explain: Effect: Increasing ka increases/decreases the decay ratio (circle one). Explain: Effect: Increasing kp increases/decreases the period (circle one). Explain: 2√mk (5.3) Effect: Increasing kp slightly increases/decreases the decay ratio. (read the explanation, then circle one). Explanation: Increasing kp increases the effective stiffness in the system which increases wn, which increases wa Decreasing decreases the logarithmic which decreases Tperiod. Increasing k, decreases since 2 TC (the numerator decreases and the denominator increases). decrement since logDecrement (6.2) √√1-(2 Decreasing logDecrement increases the decay ratio since decayRatio = e-logDecrement = (6.2) 1.12 PD Feedback control of a critically-damped mass-spring-damper system Hw 4.11 considered underdamped control systems for vehicle ride. Your engineering manager suggests critical-damping may be better at decreasing force transmitted to the vehicle's occupants. She wants you to reconsider the same mass-spring-damper system and use the same proportional-derivative (PD) feedback control law, namely f(y,y) mjj+by+ky = f(u.9) f(y,y) -kay - kpy • To ensure you understand the critical-damping design specifications, make a rough hand-sketch of the first 3 sec- onds of y(t) with y(3) = 0.025 m. Use the same initial values as in Hw 4.11, namely y(0) = 1.0 m and y(0) = 0. The standard mathematical form for a linear constant- coefficient homogeneous 2nd-order ODE is 0.9 08 0.7 m f(t) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.5 13 Time (seconds) 2 2.5 3 ⚫ Determine the equation governing w, so y(t) is critically-damped with y(3) = 0.025 m. +2(w + w = 0 polution for u(t) in Hw 3.8. 0 t (sec) 0 y(t) (meters) 1.5 2 2 decay Ratio 0.0 0.5 0.5 * Tperiod 2.dR°.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 Tperiod 0.5 2-dR 0 1.5 1.5* Tperiod -0.25 2.dts -0.5 -1 2.0 2.0* Tperiod 0.125 2-dk2 -15 Note: In the 3rd column, put an exact numerical value for y(t). Optional: In the 4th-column, put an expression involving decayRatio. -2 0 0.25 05 0.75 time (seconds) 1.25 15 4.11 PD feedback control of an underdamped mass-spring-damper system Homework 4.9 sized leaf springs and shock absorbers to tune a vehicle's ride. The vehicle 200 kg, linear damping was modeled as a "mass-spring-damper" system, with mass m = 7948, and forcing function f(t). constant b 204.3 Ns, linear spring constant k The ODE governing displacement y(t) from equilibrium is shown below. The system is modified using the proportional-derivative (PD) feedback-control for f(t) shown below. System response is tuned by proper choice of the constants ka and kp. = m' mj + (b+ka) is + (k + kp) 31 = 0 1.75 2 foo m f(y, y) = -ka y - kp y (a) Your engineering manager wants to compare the original ride characteristics with two "active suspension system" alternatives and asks you to determine the values of ka and kp for alternatives A and B (Note: Analyze the two alternatives using the original values of b and k). (b) Ride characteristics Original vehicle A. Simulates improved shocks B. Simulates stiff springs/shocks N sec m Vibration period (secs) Decay ratio ka kp 45 1.0 0.6 0 0 1.0 0.75 0.4 162.2 115.7 0.4 284.4 6387 Your manager asks: "How does the control system affect the ride?" Using only vibration period, decay ratio, and initial values y(0) = 1.0 m, y(0) = 0. sketch (by hand) the first 3 seconds of the vehicle's response and determine y(3) for each suspension system. Ride characteristics Original vehicle B. Stiff springs/shocks A. Improved shocks y(-3) 0.216 meters meters meters 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 15 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 Time (seconds) (c) Which control system is more effective at driving y(t) to 0? A/B. Why is it more effective? Copyright 1992-2024 Paul Mitiguy. All rights reserved. Decay ratio measures amplitude decay between successive oscillations. In 191

Elements Of Electromagnetics
7th Edition
ISBN:9780190698614
Author:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
ChapterMA: Math Assessment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1MA
icon
Related questions
Question
Can you explain how to get the graphs and what the equations mean? I'm also confused for the fill in the blanks portion. Please and thank you!
cay
Yea
-Year- 7
measure of how
cach vibration period
ratio between
2 amplitude
eab
Juhtp
E
ແວວນເອິນ
1597
-
0%
13%
Carbohydrate 350
Robes ray Added Sugars 58%
Protale 00
seconds, control system B has 4 oscillations (1.33 Hz), whereas A has only 3 oscillations (1 Hz). Amplitude at
3 sec can be calculated by multiplying the initial displacement by the appropriate number of decay ratios, that is
(d) Discuss how increasing ka and kp affect period of vibration and decay ratio.
Effect: Increasing ka slightly increases the period of vibration (7period).
Explain:
Effect: Increasing ka increases/decreases the decay ratio (circle one).
Explain:
Effect: Increasing kp increases/decreases the period (circle one).
Explain:
2√mk
(5.3)
Effect: Increasing kp slightly increases/decreases the decay ratio. (read the explanation, then circle one).
Explanation: Increasing kp increases the effective stiffness in the system which increases wn, which increases wa
Decreasing decreases the logarithmic
which decreases Tperiod. Increasing k, decreases since
2 TC (the numerator decreases and the denominator increases).
decrement since logDecrement
(6.2) √√1-(2
Decreasing logDecrement increases the decay ratio since decayRatio
=
e-logDecrement
=
(6.2)
1.12 PD Feedback control of a critically-damped mass-spring-damper system
Hw 4.11 considered underdamped control systems for vehicle ride. Your engineering
manager suggests critical-damping may be better at decreasing force transmitted to
the vehicle's occupants. She wants you to reconsider the same mass-spring-damper system
and use the same proportional-derivative (PD) feedback control law, namely
f(y,y)
mjj+by+ky = f(u.9)
f(y,y)
-kay - kpy
• To ensure you understand the critical-damping design
specifications, make a rough hand-sketch of the first 3 sec-
onds of y(t) with y(3) = 0.025 m. Use the same initial values
as in Hw 4.11, namely y(0) = 1.0 m and y(0) = 0.
The standard mathematical form for a linear constant-
coefficient homogeneous 2nd-order ODE is
0.9
08
0.7
m
f(t)
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
0.5
13
Time (seconds)
2
2.5
3
⚫ Determine the equation governing w, so y(t) is critically-damped with y(3) = 0.025 m.
+2(w + w = 0
polution for u(t) in Hw 3.8.
Transcribed Image Text:cay Yea -Year- 7 measure of how cach vibration period ratio between 2 amplitude eab Juhtp E ແວວນເອິນ 1597 - 0% 13% Carbohydrate 350 Robes ray Added Sugars 58% Protale 00 seconds, control system B has 4 oscillations (1.33 Hz), whereas A has only 3 oscillations (1 Hz). Amplitude at 3 sec can be calculated by multiplying the initial displacement by the appropriate number of decay ratios, that is (d) Discuss how increasing ka and kp affect period of vibration and decay ratio. Effect: Increasing ka slightly increases the period of vibration (7period). Explain: Effect: Increasing ka increases/decreases the decay ratio (circle one). Explain: Effect: Increasing kp increases/decreases the period (circle one). Explain: 2√mk (5.3) Effect: Increasing kp slightly increases/decreases the decay ratio. (read the explanation, then circle one). Explanation: Increasing kp increases the effective stiffness in the system which increases wn, which increases wa Decreasing decreases the logarithmic which decreases Tperiod. Increasing k, decreases since 2 TC (the numerator decreases and the denominator increases). decrement since logDecrement (6.2) √√1-(2 Decreasing logDecrement increases the decay ratio since decayRatio = e-logDecrement = (6.2) 1.12 PD Feedback control of a critically-damped mass-spring-damper system Hw 4.11 considered underdamped control systems for vehicle ride. Your engineering manager suggests critical-damping may be better at decreasing force transmitted to the vehicle's occupants. She wants you to reconsider the same mass-spring-damper system and use the same proportional-derivative (PD) feedback control law, namely f(y,y) mjj+by+ky = f(u.9) f(y,y) -kay - kpy • To ensure you understand the critical-damping design specifications, make a rough hand-sketch of the first 3 sec- onds of y(t) with y(3) = 0.025 m. Use the same initial values as in Hw 4.11, namely y(0) = 1.0 m and y(0) = 0. The standard mathematical form for a linear constant- coefficient homogeneous 2nd-order ODE is 0.9 08 0.7 m f(t) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.5 13 Time (seconds) 2 2.5 3 ⚫ Determine the equation governing w, so y(t) is critically-damped with y(3) = 0.025 m. +2(w + w = 0 polution for u(t) in Hw 3.8.
0
t (sec)
0
y(t) (meters)
1.5
2
2 decay Ratio 0.0
0.5
0.5 * Tperiod
2.dR°.5
0.5
1.0
1.0 Tperiod
0.5
2-dR
0
1.5 1.5* Tperiod
-0.25
2.dts
-0.5
-1
2.0
2.0* Tperiod
0.125
2-dk2
-15
Note: In the 3rd column, put an exact numerical value for y(t).
Optional: In the 4th-column, put an expression involving decayRatio.
-2
0
0.25
05
0.75
time (seconds)
1.25 15
4.11 PD feedback control of an underdamped mass-spring-damper system
Homework 4.9 sized leaf springs and shock absorbers to tune a vehicle's ride. The vehicle
200 kg, linear damping
was modeled as a "mass-spring-damper" system, with mass m =
7948, and forcing function f(t).
constant b 204.3 Ns, linear spring constant k
The ODE governing displacement y(t) from equilibrium is shown below. The system is
modified using the proportional-derivative (PD) feedback-control for f(t) shown
below. System response is tuned by proper choice of the constants ka and kp.
=
m'
mj + (b+ka) is + (k + kp) 31 = 0
1.75
2
foo
m
f(y, y) = -ka y - kp y
(a) Your engineering manager wants to compare the original ride characteristics with two "active
suspension system" alternatives and asks you to determine the values of ka and kp for alternatives
A and B (Note: Analyze the two alternatives using the original values of b and k).
(b)
Ride characteristics
Original vehicle
A. Simulates improved shocks
B. Simulates stiff springs/shocks
N sec
m
Vibration period (secs) Decay ratio
ka
kp
45
1.0
0.6
0
0
1.0
0.75
0.4
162.2
115.7
0.4
284.4
6387
Your manager asks: "How does the control system
affect the ride?" Using only vibration period, decay
ratio, and initial values y(0) = 1.0 m, y(0) = 0. sketch
(by hand) the first 3 seconds of the vehicle's response
and determine y(3) for each suspension system.
Ride characteristics
Original vehicle
B. Stiff springs/shocks
A. Improved shocks
y(-3)
0.216 meters
meters
meters
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 15 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75
Time (seconds)
(c) Which control system is more effective at driving y(t) to 0? A/B.
Why is it more effective?
Copyright 1992-2024 Paul Mitiguy. All rights reserved.
Decay ratio measures amplitude decay between successive oscillations. In
191
Transcribed Image Text:0 t (sec) 0 y(t) (meters) 1.5 2 2 decay Ratio 0.0 0.5 0.5 * Tperiod 2.dR°.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 Tperiod 0.5 2-dR 0 1.5 1.5* Tperiod -0.25 2.dts -0.5 -1 2.0 2.0* Tperiod 0.125 2-dk2 -15 Note: In the 3rd column, put an exact numerical value for y(t). Optional: In the 4th-column, put an expression involving decayRatio. -2 0 0.25 05 0.75 time (seconds) 1.25 15 4.11 PD feedback control of an underdamped mass-spring-damper system Homework 4.9 sized leaf springs and shock absorbers to tune a vehicle's ride. The vehicle 200 kg, linear damping was modeled as a "mass-spring-damper" system, with mass m = 7948, and forcing function f(t). constant b 204.3 Ns, linear spring constant k The ODE governing displacement y(t) from equilibrium is shown below. The system is modified using the proportional-derivative (PD) feedback-control for f(t) shown below. System response is tuned by proper choice of the constants ka and kp. = m' mj + (b+ka) is + (k + kp) 31 = 0 1.75 2 foo m f(y, y) = -ka y - kp y (a) Your engineering manager wants to compare the original ride characteristics with two "active suspension system" alternatives and asks you to determine the values of ka and kp for alternatives A and B (Note: Analyze the two alternatives using the original values of b and k). (b) Ride characteristics Original vehicle A. Simulates improved shocks B. Simulates stiff springs/shocks N sec m Vibration period (secs) Decay ratio ka kp 45 1.0 0.6 0 0 1.0 0.75 0.4 162.2 115.7 0.4 284.4 6387 Your manager asks: "How does the control system affect the ride?" Using only vibration period, decay ratio, and initial values y(0) = 1.0 m, y(0) = 0. sketch (by hand) the first 3 seconds of the vehicle's response and determine y(3) for each suspension system. Ride characteristics Original vehicle B. Stiff springs/shocks A. Improved shocks y(-3) 0.216 meters meters meters 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 15 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 Time (seconds) (c) Which control system is more effective at driving y(t) to 0? A/B. Why is it more effective? Copyright 1992-2024 Paul Mitiguy. All rights reserved. Decay ratio measures amplitude decay between successive oscillations. In 191
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780190698614
Author:
Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780134319650
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781259822674
Author:
Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. Boles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Control Systems Engineering
Control Systems Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118170519
Author:
Norman S. Nise
Publisher:
WILEY
Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781337093347
Author:
Barry J. Goodno, James M. Gere
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118807330
Author:
James L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige, J. N. Bolton
Publisher:
WILEY