Rhodes_Jaylen_Week2Assignment

pdf

School

University of Louisville *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

632

Subject

Statistics

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

4

Uploaded by CountKnowledgeArmadillo48

Report
Jaylen Rhodes Week 2 Assignment EM 632 1. Find the P-value of the test statistic Z0 = 2.50 for the following hypothesis where variance is known. H0: μ =100 and H1: μ > 100. Z0 = 2.50 using the table, that is approximately 0.9938 P(1-Z0) = 1 - P(Z0) = 1 - 0.9938 = 0.0062 2. What does it mean to have a process that is considered to be in statistical control? A process that is considered to be in statistical control is one where the variation in its output is consistent, predictable, and stable over time. 3. Referencing Equation 5.1 in the text and in the Chapter 5 Slides, how will a control chart respond if larger values of L are selected? What if smaller values of L are selected? Higher values of L allows for more variation at a given value of σw before process is stopped to search for assignable cause whereas smaller values of L allows for less variation at a given value of σw. 4. When sampling subgroups from a process, should the subgroup size and sampling frequency be such that variation due to assignable cause is found within subgroups or between them? Why? When sampling subgroups from a process in statistical process control (SPC), it's essential to design the subgroup size and sampling frequency to capture variation due to assignable causes within subgroups rather than between them. This is because it allows for detecting issues earlier, stablizing processes and minimizing impact of external factors and lastly, it allows for better decision making. 5. If the time order of production has not been recorded in a set of data from a process, is it possible to detect the presence of assignable causes? Why or why not? If the time order of production isn't recorded in a dataset, it's hard to detect assignable causes, which are specific reasons for variations in the process. This is because there’s no timeline meaning we can’t determine if variations happen at random or not for example. It’s hard to compare to the Normal or the baseline, its generally just hard to find causes as well. 6. A machine is used to fill containers with a liquid product. Fill volume can be assumed to benormally distributed. A random set of ten containers is selected and the net contents (oz)are measured. See data presented in #6 tab of the Excel file.
a. Suppose the manufacturer wants to be sure that the net contents mean exceeds 12oz. What conclusions can be drawn from the data (use α = 0.01)? Using a one-sample t-test given sample mean is 12.03, population mean is 12, sample standard deviation is 0.03162 and sample size is 10 with significance level of 0.01 and 9 degrees of freedom which gives critical value 2.8214: H_0: μ ≤ 12 (Mean fill volume is less than or equal to 12 oz). H_1: μ > 12 (Mean fill volume exceeds 12 oz). t would come out to be 4.7428 and since this is larger than the critical value of 2.8214, we reject the null hypothesis and this means we can conclude that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the net content mean exceeds 12 oz at the 0.01 significance level. b. Construct a 95% two-sided confidence interval on the mean fill volume. Well using minitab and the t-table for 95% confidence and 9 degrees of freedom, we get a critical value of 2.262. The confidence interval becomes x_bar t_crit * (s / sqrt(n)) = 12.03 2.262 * (0.03162 / sqrt(10)) The 95% confidence interval is then (11.99612, 12.06388) ounces. c. Construct a normal probability plot. Does the assumption of normality seem appropriate for the fill volume data?
The assumption of normality does seem appropriate for the fill volume data as it forms a straight line in the normal probability plot meaning the data is normally distributed. 7. Two processes are used to produce forgings used in an aircraft wing assembly. Of 200 forgings selected from process 1, 10 do not conform to the strength specifications, whereas of 300 forgings selected from process 2, 20 are nonconforming. a. Estimate the fraction nonconforming for each process. Process 1: n_1 = 200, x_1 = 10 so p_hat_1 = x_1 / n_1 = 10 / 200 = 0.05 Process 2: n_2 = 300, x_2 = 20 so p_hat_2 = x_2 / n_2 = 20 / 300 = 0.0667 b. Test the hypothesis that the two processes have identical fractions nonconforming(α = 0.05). p_hat = x_1 + x_2 / n_1 + n_2 = 10 + 20 / 200 + 300 = 30 / 500 = 0.06 H_0: The fractions nonconforming for the two processes are equal. H_1: The fractions nonconforming for the two processes are not equal. z = (p_hat_1 - p_hat_2) / sqrt(p_hat(1-p_hat)(1 /n_1 + 1/n_2)) z = (0.05 - 0.0667) / sqrt(0.06(1-0.06)(1/200 + 1/300)) z = -0.0167 / sqrt(0.06(0.94)(1/200 + 1/300)) z = -0.0167 / sqrt(0.06(0.94)(1/120)) z = -0.0167 / sqrt(0.00049902) = -0.7496 The critical value for a two-tailed test with α = 0.05 is 1.96. Since the absolute value of the test statistic -0.7496 < 1.96, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means the fractions nonconforming for the two processes are equal. c. Construct a 90% confidence interval on the difference in fraction nonconforming between the two processes. z_α/2 = 1.645 (p_hat_1 - p_hat_2) z_α/2 * sqrt((p_hat_1(1 - p_hat_1)/n_1) + (p_hat_2(1 - p_hat_2)/n_2)) (0.05 - 0.0667) 1.645 * sqrt((0.05(1-0.05)/200) + (0.0667(1-0.0667)/300)) -0.0167 1.645 * sqrt(0.0004452667) -0.0167 1.645 * 0.0211 -0.0167 0.0347 The 90% confidence interval is then (-0.0514, 0.0180) forgings.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
8. Suppose we wish to test the hypotheses of H0: μ = 15 and H1: μ ≠ 15 where we know that σ2 = 9.0. If the true mean is really 20, what sample size must be used to ensure theprobability of type II error is no greater than 0.10? Assume that α = 0.05. Given, σ2 = 9.0, σ = 3.0, H0: μ0 = 15, H1: μ1 = 20, α = 0.05, and β ≤ 0.10 We need to find sample size n such that 1 - β is at least 1 - 0.10 = 0.9 1 - β = 0.9, with z_α/2 = 1.96 gives us a z value of 1.28 z = (μ1 - μ0) / (σ / sqrt(n)) 1.28 = (20 - 15) / (3 / sqrt(n)) = 5 / (3*sqrt(n)) = 5*sqrt(n) / 3 1.28 = 5 * sqrt(n) / 3 sqrt(n) = (1.28 * 3) / 5 sqrt(n) = 0.768 n = 0.768^2 = 0.590 Since the sample size n must be a positive integer, we round up to ensure the Type II error is no greater than 0.10. Therefore, the sample size n required to ensure the probability of Type II error is no greater than 0.10 is 1.