Schenck v. US

pdf

School

Eastfield College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2305-45407

Subject

Political Science

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

2

Uploaded by HighnessTurkeyPerson560

Report
In your own words, provide the following information: Schenck v. US Background During World War I, Congress passed the Espionage Act of 1917, which made it a crime to convey information intended to interfere with the war effort. The Act made it a crime to convey information intended to interfere with the war effort. In his opinion for the Court, Holmes established the famous “clear and present danger test”— a key reminder that free speech rights are not absolute. Justice Holmes and his colleague, Justice Louis Brandeis, would lead the way with a series of famous free-speech opinions over the next decade. Facts Schenck was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act of 1917 by attempting to cause insubordination in the military and to obstruct recruitment. Schenck and Baer were convicted of violating this law and appealed on the grounds that the statute violated the First Amendment. Constitutional Question/Issue Did Schenck's conviction for criticizing the draft espionage bill violate his First Amendment right to free speech? Decision Schenck v. United States, 249 Section 47 of the United States (1919) upholds the Espionage Act of 1917, giving defendants under the First Amendment the right to speak freely during World War II and to draft I. A decision by the United States Supreme Court concluded that there was no right to dissent.
Significance/ Precedence Under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the Supreme Court has devised the famous "clear and present dangers" test to determine when states can limit an individual's constitutional right to free expression. .
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help