CJ 207 Project One Template

docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

207

Subject

Political Science

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by ChancellorLightningFly24

Report
CJ 207 Project One Template Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information. The Court System Relationship Among the Three Courts Checks and Balances Relationship of the Supremacy Clause and Federal Superiority Rule to the Courts The United States has a dual court structure. The federal court system and the state courts. The federal court system has three tiers: district courts, courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court (Hemmens, Brody, Spohn, 2019). The district court is the trial court. Within limits set by Congress and the Constitution. They have jurisdiction of federal civil and criminal cases. The court of appeal hears appeals from lower courts of both civil and criminal trails, however, does not investigate the facts of a case. Its whether or not the law has been fairly applied. The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest and power of the land court. The state courts pertain state that implement their own type of structure. Although state and federal courts may be different, they have the ability to try an offender without defying the double jeopardy clause. The constitution created checks and balances. This is three separated branches legislative, executive and judicial. Each of these branches have specific power. Checks and balances provides a judiciary that was on equal footing with and independent of the legislative and executive branches (Hemmens, Brody, Spohn, 2019). Either branch can have too much power within our country this is known as the separation of power. The United States Constitution is referred to the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law take priority over state laws and even with state constitutions. The federal superiority prohibits states from interfering with the federal governments exercise of its constitutional powers. From any functions that are exclusively entrusted to the federal government. Functions and Responsibilities of Various Members
Members Functions Responsibilities Judge Are public officers authorized by law to her legal disputes, administer the law, and preside over courts of justice (Hemmens, Brody, Spohn, 2019). They listen to arguments and determine if the evidence presented deserves a trail. Judges safeguard both the rights of the accused and the interests of the public in administration of criminal justice. They Read and evaluate information from documents such as motions, claim, applications, and records. Also, they preside over hearings and listed to and read arguments by opposing parties. Judges determine if the information presented supports the charge, claim, or dispute. They apply laws or precedents to reach judgments and resolve disputes between parties. Additionally, they set conditions for defendant upon trial and/or after trail. Judges will approve warrants and arrest warrants. Lastly, they instruct jurors on applicable laws and direct them to consider the facts from the evidence given. Prosecutor Seek to protect the innocent and convict the guilty. They act as a legal representative of a victim of a crime. Decides who will be charged, what charge will be filed, who will be offered a plea bargain, and the type of bargain that will be offered (Hemmens, Brody, Spohn, 2019). They present evidence designed to prove that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to the judge or jury and argues for the defendant’s conviction (Hemmens, Brody, Spohn, 2019). Also, they may recommend to the judge of the sentence the offender should receive. They appear before the appellate court to argue that the conviction should not be overturned. Defense Counsel The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to have the assistance of counsel for Defense Counsel will Fight for the defendant in the court of law. Entitled to be present during the police’s interview. May request the police to take investigative
Roles of Various Courts Local Appeals Courts State Appeals Courts Federal Appeals Courts Special Courts or Problem-Solving Courts A Local Appeal Court serves as a general appeal court having authority within a country. Depending on the matter that is tried, the justices consider each decision issued mostly by trail judges from different department. Since this court is based by regional differences there is only one court system that has jurisdiction over it. The State Appeals Court handles the majority of legal matters as the main function. The supervise in the following: property sales, purchases, traffic violations, divorces, wills, and estate distribution. The three tiers of courts are: the trial court, one appellate court, and one supreme court. The Federal Appeals court of thirteen has exclusively hear a case from many distinct courts out of 94 districts. This is based on jurisdiction because of the lack of jurisdiction. They never try to hear matters from state courts. There are three main districts that are covered in the Federal Appeal Courts are Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New Jersey. The similarities between special courts and problem- solving courts is how they both address issues with narcotics, domestic violence, reentry into the country, and veteran treatment. Problem-solving courts offer second chances for minor offense or disruptions. Jurisdictions Military Courts Native American Courts Military courts are authorized by Article I of the U.S Constitution. This type of court has jurisdiction over cases involving military service members and, in some cases, even retired service members. This systems procedures are efficient and ensure swift and certain decisions and troop punishments. The Native American Courts are empowered to resolve conflicts and disputes arising from within a tribe’s jurisdictions and to enforce tribal law. Tribes maintain sovereign authority to determine and control their own justice systems. The U.S. Congress authorized these states to have criminal jurisdiction over all offenses involving Native Americans on tribal lands. Also, Congress authorized state courts with jurisdiction in civil cases.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
References: Hemmens, C., Brody, D. C., & Spohn, C. (2019). Criminal Courts: A Contemporary Perspective (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. (US). https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/books/9781544338934 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022, September 8). Judges and hearing officers: Occupational outlook handbook . U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved January 29, 2023, from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/legal/judges-and-hearing-officers.htm#tab-2 Military law - military criminal justice system . Military Criminal Justice System - Court, Martial, Courts, and Judge - JRank Articles. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2023, from https://law.jrank.org/pages/8564/Military-Law-Military-Criminal-Justice-System.html Native American Tribal Courts . Ballotpedia. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2023, from https://ballotpedia.org/Native_American_Tribal_Courts