New York Times v. United States court case brief
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Miami Dade College, Miami *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1060C
Subject
Political Science
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by machingaby12
Gabrielle Machin
AP Period:7
New York Times v. United States court case brief Summary:
A top-secret Department of Defense analysis of American political and military engagement in Vietnam between 1945 and 1967 is known as the Pentagon Papers. Former military analyst Daniel Ellsberg first gave The New York Times access to the records, then The Washington Post. Based on the documents, a number of articles were published in both newspapers. Former military analyst Daniel Ellsberg was instrumental in the Pentagon Papers' public release. Disappointed with how the U.S. government was managing the war, Ellsberg sent The New York Times copies of the confidential materials.
Outcome:
The ruling in New York Times v. United States emphasized the value of a strong and free press in
a democratic society and reaffirmed the idea that the government encounters significant obstacles when attempting to stop the publishing of secret material for reasons of national security.
Majority Opinion:
The Supreme Court upheld the idea that prior constraint on publication is usually illegal when it found 6-3 in favor of the media. The Court's opinion was given by Justice Hugo L. Black.First Amendment Protection, Significant Prior Restraint Requirement, Lack of Direct and Immediate Danger, and Value of a Free Press
Dissent:
Gabrielle Machin
AP Period:7
New York Times v. United States court case brief Because they were concerned about the possible harm to national security, three justices dissented. They maintained that the Court ought to have respected the executive branch's judgment on how publishing might affect national security. The Pentagon Papers are regarded as an important historical record that revealed the discrepancy between official pronouncements and the inner workings of government decision-making in the Vietnam War. The case also demonstrated how important it is for the press to be free in order to hold the government responsible for its deeds.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help