discuss whether the criminal justice system has been politicized by bringing

docx

School

University of Kabianga *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

Subject

Political Science

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by GeneralCobra390

1 Donald Trump indicted Name of student Course Code: Course Title Instructor Date of Submission

2 Recently, the criminal justice system has been at the receiving end after the arrest of Donald Trump. Citizens have voiced their opinions; others are disgruntled and dissatisfied with the action. I think the criminal justice system has been politicized by bringing criminal justice against political opponents. Citizens and the criminal justice system face significant difficulties when political leaders exploit criminal justice problems to boost their popularity, electability, or power. This problem has been politicized when politicians utilize tough-on-crime language in their campaigns. Politicians may turn to demagoguery or appeal to people's baser instincts rather than reason when criminal justice issues become overly politicized. Crime prevention discussions are hampered by political demagoguery. As an example, take the allegations that some U.S. attorneys unfairly prosecuted only Democrats for crimes that Republicans also committed. Recent data from one analysis indicates that under the Bush administration, the Department of Justice conducted 375 investigations targeting political candidates and officeholders. Most of those probes focused on Democrats (Boosey, 2023, p.29). There has been a steady flow of disturbing situations that question the department's impartiality, but personnel need the opportunity to provide detailed explanations. I have looked into this pattern and found several examples illustrating the problem. Several cases have come to my attention, but I'd want to focus on one that illustrates the potential for biased and problematic prosecution. Trial lawyer Paul Minor, a prominent Democratic supporter in Mississippi, was mentioned by the U.S. Congress House Committee on the Judiciary (2008) for having won two significant lawsuits against companies that may have been affiliated with the U.S. attorney. He was charged with bribery for allegedly offering financial guarantees and a place to reside to Mississippi Supreme Court Justice Oliver Diaz.

3 After defeating the U.S. attorney's close friend in an election for the Mississippi Supreme Court, the justice was indicted on corruption accusations from his dealings with Paul Minor. U.S. Congress House Committee on the Judiciary (2008) claims that the timing of the indictments, which came out 90 days before the 2003 gubernatorial race, was intended to cast an unfavorable image on the Democratic Party. There was no evidence of an attempt to influence or even influence the justice, although there were financial ties between Paul Minor and the justice. The prosecution did not present any evidence from any of Paul Minor's cases that were heard in court. Furthermore, no other judges were questioned to determine whether or not the justice had improperly influenced any cases involving Paul Minor or anybody associated with him. The fact that Paul Minor's alleged wrongdoings were commonplace in Mississippi but had never before resulted in prosecution is the final piece of evidence against him. Both Paul Minor and the judge ended up being acquitted of all charges. The Republican contender for governor in Mississippi was already elected when he was acquitted. A famous Republican contributor and the brother-in-law of a Republican U.S. senator are targets of allegations of political favoritism directed at the assigned U.S. attorney. The Republican contributor was not only a financial supporter of the judge but also a co-owner of the building in which the judge and Paul Minor were both suspected of wrongdoing. Despite this evidence, the Republican donor was not even questioned, let alone indicted. Donald Trump's case is genuine and demonstrates a bias in applying the law (Cole & Kashiwagi, 2023, para 11). To back up her claim that "the vast majority of blacks view the criminal justice system as unfair," she cites statistics showing that this is, in fact, the case.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4 According to a 2013 Pew study (Zavrnik, 2020, p.568), African-Americans are substantially more likely than whites to claim that blacks have suffered unfair treatment when interacting with police or in the courts. Black individuals are more likely to claim that the police or courts are unjust to their people than people of other races because they believe the criminal justice system is incredibly biased against them. Black individuals also believe the criminal justice system has more racial prejudice than other institutions such as schools and hospitals. Seven out of ten African Americans surveyed by Anderson reported feeling unfair treatment at the hands of law enforcement. Contrast that with the 51% of Hispanics and 37% of whites who share this attitude. Additionally, 68% of blacks, a far higher percentage than whites or Hispanics, felt the justice system was biased against them (Zavrnik, 2020, p.568) Understanding the public's views on pressing issues is crucial. Black people are more likely than members of any other minority group to feel that the police have mistreated them compared to White people. While a sizable minority of whites and a majority of Hispanics shared the views of African-Americans who believe the justice system is biased against them, the majority of the latter group believed that the courts were fair to everyone. This article contends that the politicization of justice in the United States has led to a flawed judicial system. Even as police forces around the country have become more diverse and reflective of the communities they monitor, there has been a problematic continuity of bigotry, exploitation, and abuse. In a society where wealth and status are unequally distributed, the legal system disproportionately affects the poor and working class.

5 References Boosey, C. J. (2023). Federal Law Enforcement Reform: Depoliticization into a Constitutional Framework to Restore Public Confidence. Cole, D., & Kashiwagi, S. (2023, March 31). Donald Trump has been indicted following an investigation into a hush money payment scheme. Here’s what we know. CNN . Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/31/politics/trump-indictment-what-to- know/index.html United States Congress House Committee on the Judiciary. (2008). Allegations of selective prosecution: The erosion of public confidence in our federal judicial system : Joint hearing before the subcommittee on crime, terrorism, and homeland security and the subcommittee on commercial and administrative law of the committee on the judiciary, house of representatives, one hundred tenth congress, first session, October 23, 2007 . U.S. Government Printing Office. Završnik, A. (2020, March). Criminal justice, artificial intelligence systems, and human rights. In ERA Forum (Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 567-583). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

discuss whether the criminal justice system has been politicized by bringing

Related Documents