Discussion 3- texas revolution

.docx

School

Houston Community College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1301

Subject

Political Science

Date

Jun 27, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by BaronStrawRaven52

Discussion 3-Texas Revolution Name: Carlos Mateus Date: 06/25 1. The “General Provisions” section of the Republic of Texas Constitution explicitly protected the institution of slavery and restricted the rights of “Indians” and “Africans” from living freely in the country or becoming citizens. This differs significantly from the U.S. Constitution, which did not have such explicit provisions regarding citizenship based on race. 2. Theodore Sedgwick’s position on the annexation of Texas to the U.S. is negative. He views the annexation of Texas as unconstitutional, as evidenced by his work “Thoughts on the Proposed Annexation of Texas” where he declares the annexation of Texas unconstitutional. Sedgwick did not support the idea of Texas becoming part of the United States. 3. Sedgwick suggests that Texans “abandoned freedom for despotism” by exchanging Mexican rule for a dictatorial government under Santa Anna during the Texas Revolution. He identifies Mexico’s centralist government, led by Santa Anna, as the issue, which centralized power and limited the autonomy and freedoms of Texan colonists. This was a significant issue because it went against the colonists’ desire for self-governance and individual liberties, leading to their revolt against Mexican authority. 4. Anson Jones was the fourth and last president of the Republic of Texas. His letter to the editor of Civilian and Gazette was about his opposition to the Texas Railroad, Navigation, and Banking Company. Some of the challenges the Republic of Texas faced, according to Jones, included tensions with Mexico, the issue of annexation by the United States, and the need for legislation to regulate medical practice and establish a university endowment. 5. Jones believed that Texas could be an asset to the U.S. due to its vast land, resources, and potential for economic growth. He argued that Texas could strengthen the U.S. both economically and strategically by providing a buffer zone against Mexico and other potential threats.
6. President James K. Polk supported the annexation of Texas and viewed Mexico’s refusal to recognize Texan independence and the potential threat of war with Mexico as significant challenges to the United States. Polk assured Texas of U.S. defense and aimed to establish the southern border at the Rio Grande, escalating tensions with Mexico. 7. Jose Maria Tornel was a 19 th -century Mexican army general and politician who served as the Mexican ambassador to the United States in 1830. He was a bitter enemy of American policies and informed the Mexican government about American ambitions to take Texas. Tornel’s perspective on Texas’s annexation by the U.S. was critical and opposed to American expansionism. 8. Tornel expressed concern about New Mexico and California, stating that Texas’s fate would be of concern to these territories due to the potential expansionist ambitions of the United States. Tornel believed that the fate of Texas could set a precedent for America’s encroachment and territorial ambitions towards New Mexico and California, leading to potential threats to Mexico’s northern territories. 9. Everyday Tejanos and Tejanas became involved in the Texas Revolution by participating in various roles such as providing supplies, joining the military, and serving as scouts and spies. They fought alongside Anglo settlers against the Mexican government. The difference lies in the motivations behind their involvement, with some Tejanos supporting Mexican independence while others sought greater autonomy within Mexican or Texas independence. The similarities include their shared experiences of facing discrimination and seeking to protect their land and rights. 10. Jan Seguin and Rafael Manchola held different positions during the Texas Revolution. Juan Seguin was a Tejano leader who supported the Texian cause and fought alongside them at the Battle of the Almo and the Battle of San Jacinto. On the other hand, Rafael Manchola was a Mexican officer who fought against the Texians. Therefore, their positions were different during the Texas Revolution.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help