Discussion Board Makeup

.docx

School

Eastern Idaho Technical College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

AMERICAN G

Subject

Political Science

Date

May 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by ElderElectron12836

Government and Politics Discussion Board Makeup U7D1: Current Event- Current Civil Rights Case First Post: Case: Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee This case is about Arizona's voting rules. Two specific rules are being challenged: one says officials must throw out ballots cast at the wrong place, and the other makes it illegal for most people to collect ballots from others (called "ballot harvesting"). The Democratic National Committee (DNC) says these rules make it harder for minority voters to vote, breaking the Voting Rights Act and the 14th Amendment's rule about treating everyone equally. I believe the Supreme Court needs to balance Arizona's need to control elections with protecting everyone's right to vote. The 14th Amendment says everyone should be treated equally under the law, including when it comes to voting. Laws that make it harder for some people, especially minorities, to vote need to be carefully looked at. The Voting Rights Act was made to stop discrimination in voting. It's important to make sure these rules in Arizona don't stop people from voting, especially minority groups. Arizona needs to show a good reason for these rules, and they should only affect voting as little as possible. How do you think the Supreme Court should decide on voting rules that might make it harder for some people to vote, especially minority groups? Sources: Bronner v. Duggan | Center for Constitutional Rights (ccrjustice.org) Bronner v. Duggan, No. 19-7017 (D.C. Cir. 2020) :: Justia How do you think the Supreme Court should decide on voting rules that might make it harder for some people to vote, especially minority groups? Peer Response (Tell Jewell): I totally agree with you about the NCAA transfer rule being ridiculous. It's like they're trying to control where athletes go to school, which isn't fair. Athletes should have the right to choose their own education without being penalized for it. It's just not right, and it goes against the idea of equal opportunities for everyone. Do you think the NCAA will ever change this rule? Peer Response (Makai Peak): You made some really good points about the abortion case in Idaho. It's a tough situation because there are rights on both sides to consider. It's like, how do you balance the rights of women with the rights of unborn babies? And you're right, the Constitution does talk about rights like life and liberty, so it's important to think about that. But it's also tricky because everyone has different beliefs about when life starts. How do you think the Supreme Court will decide on this? Peer Response (Izzy Ross):
You did a great job explaining the Idaho abortion case. It's definitely a complex issue, especially with the state and federal laws conflicting. And it's true, with Idaho being a red state, things get even more complicated. I guess as a Supreme Court justice, you have to put personal beliefs aside and just focus on what's right under the law. It must be tough for them to deal with all that political tension. How do you think they'll handle it? U6D1: The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) First Post: The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is both praise and criticism in American society. While it claims to support civil liberties and constitutional rights, its history includes defending controversial individuals and groups, which puts doubts about its effectiveness and moral stance. Regardless of its role in legal cases and protecting basic freedoms, there are still concerns about its defense of groups with anti- democratic beliefs. Although the ACLU is strong in its commitment to constitutional principles, its focus on abstract rights may sometimes appear to prioritize extremists over societal well-being. Because of these challenges, the ACLU must address the tension between defending civil liberties and potential harm from advocating for controversial causes. This causes important questions about the organization's strategies and priorities, creating reflection on how to balance principles and practicality in continuing its mission. Considering these challenges, how do you suggest the ACLU can effectively support civil liberties while also addressing concerns about its advocacy for contentious causes? Sources: American Civil Liberties Union. "About the ACLU." ACLU, www.aclu.org/about/ . American Civil Liberties Union. "Key Issues." ACLU, www.aclu.org/issues/ . American Civil Liberties Union. "Landmark Cases." ACLU, www.aclu.org/other/landmark-cases . American Civil Liberties Union. "Reports and Publications." ACLU, www.aclu.org/reports/ . Peer Response (Ellie Schwartz): You make a valid point about the ACLU's popularity being linked to their involvement in controversial issues. It's true that the ACLU often takes on high-profile cases and advocates for marginalized groups, which can create attention. However, I believe their popularity also starts from their commitment to defending fundamental rights for all individuals, even when it means representing unpopular viewpoints. This aspect of their work, while not universally agreed upon, is central to their mission of keeping constitutional principles. Peer Response (Miguel Albor): It's great to hear about your positive experiences with the ACLU and your support with their work, especially on important issues like women's rights, LGBT rights, and immigrant rights. Your example of being called to contribute to a project shows the impact the ACLU has on advocating for marginalized communities. If asked, I would consider helping on a project for the ACLU, because their efforts are similar to my values of equality and social justice. Peer Response (Alice Stapleton):
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help