Lab 6 Projectile Motion Handout FA23-1 (1)

docx

School

Irvine Valley College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

4A

Subject

Physics

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

10

Uploaded by k8chaewon

Report
PROJECTILE MOTION EXPERIMENT IRVINE VALLEY COLLEGE PHYSICS LAB REPORT Course Number: Physics 4A Experiment Number: lab 6 Experiment Title: projectile motion Date Performed: 4 october 2023 Due Date: 13 october 2023 RESEARCHER BASE GRADE SCALED GRADE Sejal Chopra 50 ANALYST BASE GRADE SCALED GRADE Prof. Boyd 50 PRINCIPLE INVESTIGATOR BASE GRADE SCALED GRADE Chaewon Kim 50
PROJECTILE MOTION EXPERIMENT THEORY When an object moves within two or three dimensions then it is classified as a projectile. For this type of motion, the projectile’s range is proportional to its launch angle. In the case when projectiles follow a symmetric path, due to the constant acceleration of gravity, then its range is given by the equation R = v 0 2 sin ( 2 θ 0 ) g where v 0 is the projectile’s initial speed, θ 0 is the launch angle of the projectile, and g is the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity. Using calculus, there exists a launch angle that maximizes the projectile’s range. For a launch angle of 45 ° , the maximum range of a projectile becomes R max = v 0 2 g In the special case when a projectile is launched horizontally and its trajectory is non-symmetric, its range can be calculated from the kinematic equations to produce R = v 0 2 h g where v 0 is the projectile’s initial speed, h is the projectile’s initial height above ground, and g is the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity. PROCEDURE 1. Mount the projectile launcher to the table. 2. Record the projectile height above ground. 3. Load the metal sphere inside the launcher at the short-range setting. 4. Fire the projectile horizontally and note where it lands. 5. Place a sheet of white paper onto the ground, with its center being directly above the location where the projectile landed on the floor. Tape this piece of paper securely to the floor by using masking tape. 6. Place a sheet of the carbon paper directly on top of each sheet of blank paper. The dark blue side of the paper should be facing downwards. 7. Fire the projectile two additional times. 8. Peel back the carbon paper and make sure that you can see each “hit” recorded onto the blank paper as a dark circular mark.
PROJECTILE MOTION EXPERIMENT 9. Record the projectile’s range for all the trials. 10. Repeat the previous process but with the launcher now set to the medium-range setting. 11. Change the projectile launcher angle to approximately 20 ° . Record the actual launch angle. Make sure NOT to change the height of the projectile above ground when it is launched from this new angle. 12. Launch the projectile once at the previous two range settings. Record the project’s range for each trial. 13. Repeat the previous process for the following angles: 30 ° , 40 ° , 50 ° , 60 ° , and 70 ° . 14. Open the “PHYS 4A PASCO Files” folder on the laptop. 15. Click on the “Projectile Motion Graphs.cap” file. 16. Populate the two graphs of range versus launch angle. The first graph’s data is from the short-range trials. The second graph’s data is from the medium-range trials. For each graph insert a quadratic trendline line. 17. Upload a copy of each graph into Canvas.q2 DATA ANALYSIS Use the short-range data to show the following calculations: o Horizontal Trials i. Mean Range ii. Range Percent Uncertainty iii. Mean Initial Speed iv. Initial Speed Percent Uncertainty v. Maximum Range vi. Maximum Range Percent Uncertainty o PASCO trendline equation vii. Optimal Launch Angle viii. Optimal Launch Angle Percent Uncertainty ix. Maximum Range x. Maximum Range Percent Uncertainty
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
PROJECTILE MOTION EXPERIMENT DATA TABLE 1 & 2 – INITIAL VELOCITY DETERMINATION HORIZONTAL TRIALS HEIGHT h±δh ( cm ) 81.7 ± 0.05 TRIAL RANGE R±δR ( cm ) SHORT-RANGE MEDIUM-RANGE 1 150.4 ± 0.05 187.2 ± 0.05 2 150.7 ± 0.05 187.4 ± 0.05 DATA TABLE 3 – ANGLE TRIALS ANGLE θ 0 ±δ θ 0 ( ° ) RANGE R±δR ( cm ) SHORT-RANGE MEDIUM-RANGE 20 ± 178.9 ± 0.05 247.1 ± 0.05 30 ± 182.8 ± 0.05 259.0 ± 0.05 40 ± 176.1 ± 0.05 261.2 ± 0.05 50 ± 162.4 ± 0.05 234.1 ± 0.05 60 ± 131.9 ± 0.05 193.3 ± 0.05 70 ± 92.6 ± 0.05 135.4 ± 0.05
PROJECTILE MOTION EXPERIMENT DATA TABLE 4 -GRAPH DATA TRENDLINE COEFFICIENTS A ±δA B ±δB C ±δC SHORT RANGE TRIALS 0.0556 ± 0.00 25 3.29 ± 0.23 135 ± 4.6 MEDIUM RANGE TRIALS ± ± ± Short-Range Horizontal Trials Mean Range R avg = R 1 + R 2 2 R avg = ¿ 150.55 Range Uncertainty ∆ R avg = δ R 1 + δ R 2 2 R avg x 100% ∆ R avg = ¿ 0.03% Mean Initial Speed v 0 , avg = R avg g 2 h v 0 , avg = 368.9 Initial Speed Percent Uncertainty ∆ v 0 ,avg = ( ∆ R 100% ) 2 +( δh 2 h ) 2 x 100% ∆ v 0 ,avg = ¿ 0.04%
PROJECTILE MOTION EXPERIMENT Maximum Range R (Use θ o = 45 ° ¿ R 1 max = v 0 ,avg 2 sin ( 2 θ 0 ) g R 1 max = ¿ 138.71 Maximum Range Uncertainty ∆ R max = ( 2 ∆v 0 ,avg 100% ) 2 x 100% ∆ R max = ¿ 0.08% Short-Range PASCO Trendline Equation
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
PROJECTILE MOTION EXPERIMENT Maximum Range (Use θ o = θ opt ¿ R 2 max = v 0 ,avg 2 sin ( 2 θ 0 ) g R 2 max = ¿ 120.14 Maximum Range Percent Uncertainty ∆ R max = ( 2 ∆v 0 ,avg 100% ) 2 x 100% ∆ R max = ¿ 0.08% Percent Error ( θ o = 45 ° vsθ o = θ opt ¿ PE = | 45 θ opt 45 | x 100% PE = ¿ 66% Percent Difference PD = | R 1 R 2 ( R 1 + R 2 )/ 2 | x 100% PD = ¿ 14.3%
PROJECTILE MOTION EXPERIMENT TABLE OF RESULTS HORIZONTAL TRIALS LAUNCHER SETTING SHORT-RANGE MEDIUM-RANGE MEAN RANGE R avg ±∆ R ( % ) ( cm ) 150.55 ± 0.03% 187.3 ± 0.03% MEAN INITIAL SPEED v 0 , avg ±∆v 0 ( % ) ( cm / s ) 368.8 ± 0.04% 458.93 ± 0.04% MAXIMUM RANGE R max ±∆ R max ( % ) ( cm ) 138.71 ± 0.08% 214.70 ± 0.08% ANGLED TRIALS LAUNCHER SETTING SHORT-RANGE MEDIUM-RANGE OPTIMAL LAUNCH ANGLE θ max ±∆θ max (%) ( ° ) 30 ± 37 ± MAXIMUM RANGE R max ±∆ R max (%) ( cm ) 120.14 ± 0.08 206.38 ± OPTIMAL LAUNCH ANGLE PERCENT ERROR PE ( % ) 66% 17.78% MAXIMUM RANGE PERCENT DIFFERENCE PD ( % ) 14.3% 0.11%
PROJECTILE MOTION EXPERIMENT Answer the following questions below using complete sentences: 1. Overall, were the ranges (first four horizontal trials) for the horizontal trials precise or imprecise? Justify your answer. They were precise; for the short range trials, the ranges were 150.4 and 150.7 (0.03 difference) and for the medium range trials, the ranges were 187.2 and 187.4 (0.2 difference). 2. Overall, were the initial speeds (V short and V medium) for the horizontal trials precise or imprecise? Should they be? Justify your answer. 3. Overall, were the optimal launch angles (Short versus medium) for the angle trials precise or imprecise ? Should they be? Justify your answer. Compare the angles to each other. 4. Overall, were the optimal launch angles for the angle trials accurate or inaccurate? Justify your answer. Compare the angles to 45 degrees. 5. Overall, were the maximum ranges between the horizontal and angle trials (R1 and R2) precise or imprecise ? Justify your answer. 6. Identify the independent variable(s) in this experiment. Be specific and use proper vocabulary. The independent variable in this experiment was the angle of the launch point. 7. Identify the fixed variable(s) in this experiment. Be specific and use proper vocabulary. The fixed variable in this experiment was gravity (9.81 m/s^2). 8. Identify the dependent variable(s) in this experiment. Be specific and use proper vocabulary. The dependent variable in this experiment was the range.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
PROJECTILE MOTION EXPERIMENT Include a very short (1-3 sentences) conclusion , stating your findings.