Lab Report 2

pdf

School

University Of Arizona *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

181

Subject

Physics

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

7

Uploaded by LieutenantRoseRhinoceros17

Report
Newton’s Second Law Lab Report Haley Portier Lab Partner: Robert Lovellette Course: PHYS181-001 TA: Charlotte Zehnder Due Date 6:00 PM on 9/20/23
Abstract We experimented to see how changing the hanging mass would affect the acceleration of a cart and also how changing the mass on the cart would affect acceleration. We averaged out the three accelerations for each of the weights added and also derived an expression for the acceleration using force and mass. We found that adding weight onto the hanger and taking weight off the cart allowed the acceleration to increase exponentially, while adding weight onto the cart and keeping the weight on the hanger constant made the acceleration decrease exponentially. Introduction In this lab, we wanted to see and experiment with Newton’s Second Law. We continually added mass to a hanger and took off weight from the cart to see how the acceleration of the cart would change. Ideally, the more mass on the hanger and the less mass on the cart would allow the hanger to pull the cart with more force, therefore increasing the acceleration. Then we did another round where we kept the same weight on the hanger, but increased the mass on the cart. This would do the exact opposite and make the acceleration slower because it takes more force and effort for that hanger to pull the cart as the weight increases. Procedure We set up the track and attached the hanger to the cart with a string and pulled it over a pulley, so that it would be able to pull the cart. Then we connected the cart to the PASCO Capstone Software in order to record its acceleration. Figure 1: The track, cart, hanging mass and pulley set up to record acceleration For the first part of the experiment, the total mass of everything should be fixed at 600 grams. We first added 20 g to the hanger, which means 575 g went on the cart. Then we increased the mass on the hanger by 20g each time until we got to 100g, making sure to take off weight from the cart so that it equaled 600 g. We recorded acceleration three times for each weight added onto the hanger and then we averaged them all out. For the second part, we kept the hanger mass fixed at 100g and only added weight to the cart. We increased the total mass by 250 g each time,
starting with 600 g and also added 250g with the cart mass as well, starting at 495 for the cart. Then we recorded the acceleration three times each for every time we adjusted the weights on the hanger and the cart and then we averaged out those accelerations. Theory The harder something is pulled, F, then the greater the acceleration will be, which is shown with this equation: , where a is acceleration, F is force and m is mass. To find the total mass of 𝑎 = 𝐹 ? the system, use , where is the mass of the cart and is 𝑀 ???𝑎? = 𝑀 𝑐𝑎?? + ? ℎ𝑎??𝑖?? 𝑀 𝑐𝑎?? ? ℎ𝑎??𝑖?? the mass on the hanger. You have to take gravity acting on the hanger into account as well with the equation: and combining these equations gives an expression for 𝐹 = ? ℎ𝑎??𝑖?? ? acceleration, . 𝑎 = ???𝑐? ?𝑎?? = ? ℎ𝑎??𝑖?? ? 𝑀 𝑐𝑎?? +𝑀 ℎ𝑎??𝑖?? Results Table 1: Acceleration for fixed total mass Total mass: 600 g Hanging Mass (g) Cart Mass (g) Acceleration (m/s) Acceleration (m/s) Acceleration (m/s) Average Acceleration (m/s) 20 575 0.303 0.305 0.301 0.303 40 555 0.633 0.625 0.628 0.629 60 535 0.959 0.957 0.948 0.955 80 515 1.27 1.29 1.19 1.25 100 495 1.62 1.61 1.61 1.61 Table 2: Acceleration for a fixed force Hanging mass: 100 g Cart Mass (g) Total Mass (g) Acceleration (m/s) Acceleration (m/s) Acceleration (m/s) Average Acceleration (m/s) 495 600 1.58 1.60 1.68 1.62 745 850 1.11 1.09 1.10 1.1 995 1100 0.836 0.842 0.839 0.839
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
1245 1350 0.670 0.673 0.672 0.672 1495 1600 0.531 0.549 0.554 0.545 Discussion & Conclusion We found that when you increase the mass of the hanger and decrease the mass of the cart, then the acceleration speeds up. This is because the mass of the force is increasing, therefore allowing the stronger force to act upon the cart, pulling it faster. The line of best fit indicates that the slope for the data we got for the acceleration for fixed total mass was 0.0162 and it increases in a positive slope because the cart is moving faster each time. For the acceleration for a fixed force, we found that as we added mass to the cart and allowed the hanging mass to stay the same, the acceleration started to decrease. This makes sense because as you add more weight, it’s going to take the hanger with the fixed mass more time to start to accelerate the cart. The line of best fit indicates the slope being -1.03E-03, which shows a downwards trend line. Throughout this experiment, there is definitely room for errors. One error that we could’ve had was when we recorded the acceleration for the cart, you have to highlight the slope that it creates and sometimes you can miss a chunk of the line as you’re outlining it because the laptop we used could be finicky. If this happens, then the acceleration that it shows you could be a little off, depending on how much of the line you didn’t highlight. Another error could simply be a calculation error, like calculating the average acceleration incorrectly. If you did this, then the graph would be incorrect and it might not look linear, like how it’s supposed to be. Free Body Diagrams: Cart Hanging Mass
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help