PCS125-Lab-5-Daniel--Afrah.docx

pdf

School

Toronto Metropolitan University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

125

Subject

Physics

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

8

Uploaded by jahfrey17

Report
Department of Physics Course number 125 Course Title PCS125 Semester/Year 2021-2022 Instructor Aidan Brown TA Name Zachary Anstey Lab/Tutorial Report No. 5 Report Title Charge to Mass Ratio of the electron Section No. 34 Group No. 123 Submission Date 2022-03-28 Due Date 2022-03-28 Student Name Student ID Signature Daniel Spahn-Vieira 501102103 DRSV Afrah Chishty 501027994 AC
Introduction: The objective of this lab is to observe the behaviour of a charged particle traveling in a uniform magnetic field. We will perform various experiments to confirm that the particle's velocity will travel in a circular path, and that the magnetic field is perpendicular to the velocity. Additionally using observations of how the path of the electron changes with respect to the changing magnetic field intensity, the charge/mass ratio of an electron will be determined. Theory: This lab utilized both magnetic and electric fields to put electrons into uniform circular motion, from which the charge/mass ratio of the electron could be determined. In this experiment, electrons were accelerated to high velocities using strong electric fields. Once the electrons were in motion their trajectories were shaped using strong magnetic fields, so that the electrons moved in uniform circular motion. It is known centripetal force causes acceleration toward the center of a circle, in this experiment, the magnetic fields emanating perpendicular to the helmholtz coils, thus applying a magnetic force perpendicular to the electrons path of motion, thus curving its path into a circle with a variable radius depending on the current through the coil. The formula for centripetal force is given as follows: F c = mv 2 /r The velocity of the electrons “boiling” off the filament was increased by accelerating them through a potential difference. In essence the change in potential energy was equal to the change in kinetic energy. ΔU+ΔK=0 K=1/2mv 2 U=ΔV U B -U A =q(V B -V A ) Finally the electrons were subjected to a magnetic force acting perpendicular to their initial motion. The magnitude of the magnetic field intensity varied with respect to the current running through the helmholtz coils and could be determined as follows: Based on all of the above relationships, the charge mass ratio can be determined using the following formula:
e/m=2V acc /B 2 r 2 Apparatus: - E/m Tube - Banana cables - Set of Helmholtz coils - Bar Magnet - High voltage power supply - Wooden cover - Low voltage variable power supply Procedure: Make sure at the start of the lab that all the coils are parallel to the earth’s magnetic field, the box and wires should all be connected and set up properly in advance. Consult the TA otherwise. Make sure all the power supplies are off, notice the two knobs for voltage and current. Turn on the power supply, and increase the voltage until it reaches 200-400 V or until you see a distinguishable blue-green beam emanating from the anode. Bring a magnet close to the beam, and record your observations, regarding deflection. Increase the current slowly, and notice the circular path appearing inside the tube. Change the radius of the curvature of the electron beam by adjusting the current, note the current required to make the smallest diameter. Repeat these steps for at least 10 unique diameters. Turn off all power supplies and adjust knobs to 0.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Results and Calculations: Table 1.0: Radius vs. Amperage voltage: 308 V radius (m) current (A) uncertainty (δ) 0.05 2.76 0.244444 0.055 2.54 0.174874 0.06 2.34 0.111628 0.065 2.18 0.061032 0.07 2.04 0.01676 0.075 1.9 0.027512 0.08 1.8 0.059135 0.085 1.7 0.090757 0.09 1.6 0.12238 0.095 1.54 0.141354 0.1 1.46 0.166652 Table 2.0: Magnetic field vs Radius Magnetic Field (1/B^2) Radius (r^2) 245949.2204 0.0025 290399.7118 0.003025 342162.0975 0.0036 394230.8688 0.004225 450197.7078 0.0049 518986.9199 0.005625 578253.9447 0.0064 648284.6993 0.007225 731852.6488 0.0081 789991.0529 0.009025 878937.3151 0.01
Graph 1.0: Magnetic Field vs Radius plot Analysis 1) 2)
3) For the uncertainty of the machine, since amperage was measured as 0.00 A. This would make the smallest possible value 0.01 A, and half of that value would be 0.005. Therefore, the uncertainty of the machine is 0.005. Amperage uncertainty: Wrap Up Questions: 1. The direction of the magnetic field is perpendicular to the coil in all directions. This was observed experimentally since the path of the electron became circular as the current in the coil was increased. The only way that the electron could be in circular motion is if a force was applied perpendicular to its initial direction of motion, thus the magnetic field had to be perpendicular to the coil. 2. Under constant voltage, the only thing shaping the path of the electron is the magnetic field. It is known that the centripetal force is inversely proportional to the radius of circular motion, thus an electron traveling in a tight circular path must be under a greater force than an electron travelling in a large circular path. Since centripetal acceleration is directly proportional to the radius, it holds that a particle in circular motion of a small radius must be under a greater acceleration than that of a particle in circular motion with a large radius. This is consistent with the findings of the lab since it was observed that the radius of the path that the electrons were moving in varied inversely proportionally with the current running through the helmholtz coil i.e. the radius would decrease as the magnetic field intensity(and force) increased. 3. knowing that the mass of a proton is 1.67x10 -27 kg and its charge is 1.602x10 -19 C it can be determined that its charge/mass ratio is 95 928 143.71C/kg. using the formula for charge to mass ratio stated in the theory section(c/m=2V acc /(B 2 r 2 ), and experimental data from
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
the lab (r=0.05m I=2.76A) it can be seen that 95 928 143.71=2(308)/(0.00216 2 r 2 ). Solving for r, it is determined that the radius at this current and voltage is 0.727m for a proton, whereas the experimental data has a radius of 0.05m thus the claim can be made that this particle is not a proton. 4. Knowing that c/m=2V acc /B 2 r 2 and that the values for V 1 and V 2 are 250V and 400V respectively and that the initial radius is 0.03m it can be determined that 1=(500/B 2 r 1 2 )/(800/B 2 r 2 2 ) thus (r 1 2 /r 2 2 )=⅝ thus the increase in voltage should increase the radius to 0.03(sqrt(⅝))= 0.038m. 5. Inconclusive data. Conclusion In this lab, the mass to charge ratio of an electron was determined experimentally, by observing the behaviour of electrons under the influence of strong electric and magnetic fields. by accelerating the electrons up to high velocities and then curving their trajectories using perpendicular magnetic fields. Once uniform circular motion was achieved, the radius of the motion was altered by a controlled change in current through the Helmholtz coil from which the magnetic fields were emanating, by observing the change in radius with respect to the change in current, the sensitivity of the electrons to magnetic field intensity could be determined. Using the formula e/m=2V acc /B 2 r 2 along with the formula for magnetic field intensity B=8µ 0 NI/a√125 , we were able to calculate their respective values to analyze for the confirmation of our theory. In the second part of our experiment, we bought a bar magnet close to the electron beam. We observed deflection, and after playing around with the apparatus, we concluded that the lower the current, the more deflection was shown from the bar magnet. In the first part of our lab, we turned the knob and recorded currents with different associated diameters. The smallest diameter yielded an amperage of 2.76. Using the plotted radius vs magnetic field (Graph 1.0), we calculated e/m. we compared this to our theoretical value, and since we got a considerably low error (13%), we can conclude that our theory was confirmed, and that magnetic field is perpendicular to the velocity,
and because of the blue-green hue shown in a circular path, we can also confirm that the particle had a circular path. References Serway and Jewett, Physics for Scientists and Engineers with modern physics, 10th edition, Brooks Cole, Jan. 1 2018