PHY122_Newtons2ndLaw_worksheet

pdf

School

Arkansas State University, Main Campus *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2054

Subject

Physics

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

4

Uploaded by SargentCrown13084

Report
NEWTON’S 2 nd LAW – LAB WORKSHEET Name: Newton’s 2 nd Law Partners: Shriya Danekar, Cole Kemp, Collin Hogan, Neha Satish TA: Dan Yangaliev OBJECTIVE To explore the relationship between net force and acceleration, to dissect Newton’s Second Law into a system of equations, and to solve the system of equations. Mass of S-hook = 5.3 grams Mass of cart = 512.1 grams EXPERIMENT #1 – CONSTANT SYSTEM MASS Label all values with appropriate units! Mass of the S-hook 0.0053 kg Run Mass on hanger Acceleration 1 0.0153 kg 0.231 m/s 2 0.0253 kg 0.402 m/s 3 0.0353 kg 0.577 m/s 4 0.0453 kg 0.735 m/s 5 0.0553 kg 0.902 m/s 1. What physics quantity does the slope of the velocity vs. time graph represent? 2. What does the slope of the acceleration vs. applied force represent? See step #13 in the manual. The physics quantity that the slope of the velocity vs. time graph represents acceleration. The slope of the acceleration vs. applied force represents the reciprocal of the sum of mass of the cart and hanger.
3. What is the experimental value of the total mass of the system and its corresponding uncertainty? m total = 0.567 kg m total = 0.0553-0.0153 = 0.040 kg Corresponding uncertainty = +/-0.014 4. Use the digital scale to measure the total mass of the system (cart, hanger, weights, and string). This is the theoretical value of total mass, m 0 . Calculate the percent discrepancy between m 0 and m total and show your work. See step #14 in the manual. m 0 = % = ((0.585kg - 0.5121)/0.5121) x 100% = 14.24% EXPERIMENT #2 – MEASURING GRAVITATIONAL ACCELERATION USING NEWTON’S SECOND LAW Label all values with appropriate units! Ru n Mass on hanger Moving toward sensor ( a 1 ) Moving away from sensor ( a 2 ) 1 0.0153 kg 0.255 m/s^2 0.342 m/s^2 2 0.0253 kg 0.428 m/s^2 0.528 m/s^2 3 0.0353 kg 0.584 m/s^2 0.688 m/s^2 4 0.0453 kg 0.740 m/s^2 0.840 m/s^2 5 0.0553 kg 0.894 m/s^2 0.974 m/s^2 5. Show a sample calculation for a avg using Eq. (6) in the manual. a avg = (a 1 +a 2 )/2 = (0.255+0.342)/2 = 0.299 m/s 2 𝑎 𝑎𝑣𝑔 6. Using the value of a avg you just calculated along with the masses you determined with the digital scale, show a sample calculation of gravitational acceleration using Eq. (7) in the manual. g = a avg ( M+m)/m g= 0.299(0.5121+0.0153)/0.0153 = 10.29 m/s 2 7. Using the mean value of g exp (given to you by Capstone), calculate the percent discrepancy between g exp and g 0 .
% discrepancy = | |/10.29 x 100% = 0.0360 or 3.6% 9. 92 − 10. 29 % discrepancy = |g exp − g 0 | g 0 × 100% Discussion & Conclusion Type Discussion below. It is a narrative that consists of 5 paragraphs: > Provide objectives of the experiment. > Explain theoretical concepts tested in this experiment. Describe the procedure of the experiment. > State the results. Provide numerical values with their units. Discuss the results, connect their values with the theoretical concept. > Discuss all possible sources of errors. > Conclude whether or not the results of your experiment verify the law you studied. The objectives of this experiment were to study Newton’s second law of motion which establishes the relationship between net force on a body and its acceleration by solving a system of equations. When a net force is applied on a body or bodies, they experience acceleration which can be related by Newton’s Second law, F net = m a . This concept was used in the experiment to analyze different masses on a moving cart and pulley. The experiment was set up as follows. A cart was placed on a table which had a pulley on its end. There was a mass suspended from a thin string down the table. The masses on the cart and the hanging mass were varied and acceleration was measured using a motion sensor. A graph was made plotting the acceleration versus the force applied in each run. The slope of the linear graph indicated the reciprocal of the experimental mass of the cart and hanger. Starting things off, we have the mass of the S-hook at about 0.0053 kg that we used to measure the tension of the string that pulled the mass of the cart which was 0.5121 kg. As the group recorded each of the 5 runs, the mass of the hanger along with the S-hook was calculated along with the acceleration. The relationship between the mass on the hanger and the acceleration was that as the mass of the hanger increased, the acceleration increased. When it came to the entire system, the experimental value of the total mass was 0.567 kg and its corresponding uncertainty was +/-0.014 and the change in the total mass was 0.040 kg. Then the group used the digital scale to measure the total mass of the system which included the cart, hanger, weights, and string. We then calculated the percent discrepancy between and which was 14.42%. In part 2, the group began to calculate ? 0 ? 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎? the acceleration moving away and towards the sensor. After calculations were final, the acceleration of the cart moving toward the sensor was smaller than the acceleration moving away. The group then went ahead to calculate the average acceleration in which the equation was given. This goes to gravitational acceleration as well. Finally, calculating the % discrepancy we inputted the value for the experimental gravitational acceleration - the initial gravitational acceleration and multiplied it by 100% to get our percentage value which was 3.6%. The possible sources of error in this experiment are limited to about three sources, environmental, equipment and human error. The environmental error could have come from external sources such as shifts in the table or track. Equipment errors could have come from discrepancies in weights, a bad cart, or bad data tracking from the sensor. Finally, human error could have come from how the cart was pushed or how the data collector selected the data for our experiment. The results of this experiment support the laws we studied. F net = m a as we increased the weight on the s-hook and decreased the weight on the cart, the cart accelerated faster. This supports the law
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
and is fairly accurately backed by the data. Data and Graphs collected during Lab experiment: