edited PHYS Lab#6

pdf

School

New York University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

UA11

Subject

Physics

Date

May 14, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

9

Uploaded by superduperhwhelper

Report
Lab #6: Conservation of Energy PHYS-UA11
Objective and Description In this experiment, students further develop their skills with the Capstone interface in order to observe the Conservation of Energy. This lab consists of three parts. In the first part, a rubber tube is dropped through the photogate sensor that students were introduced to in previous experiments. In the second part, a 0.1kg hanging mass and the photogate are used, which students have been previously introduced to. However, they are used in a new way, as the mass is set up in such a way that it can be treated as a pendulum. Finally, in the last part, a 0.5kg weight is attached to a spring and allowed to oscillate, while its motion is detected with the motion sensor. Through each experiment, the application of the conservation of energy in a physical sense can be evaluated. Theory In previous experiments, the work-energy theorem, which shows that the integration of Newton’s Second Law yields W=∆KE, was observed. This experiment expands upon that observation to state that this work, or line integral, may have two different possibilities. In one instance, the work depends on the path and is considered non-conservative , while in the other, it is path-independent and therefore, conservative . From the second case, the work can be derived such that the potential energy is equal to the kinetic energy, or, U f + KE f = U i + KE i Where each side is the total mechanical energy, E . If E is conserved such that E f =E i , this is referred to as the conservation of energy . Procedure The procedure was followed fairly closely to that of the write-up with a few differences. For section 3, we only used heights of 15cm and 25cm and did not include 35cm. We also only used the rubber tube and not the paper tube. One significant mistake that occurred during this part happened due to
being new to the calipers. When measuring the diameter of the tube, the inches side was accidentally used instead of the centimeters side. This is a serious problem because this diameter is entered as the Flag Width in Capstone. As a result, all of the data was off and my partner and I had to repeat this step. In section 4, we ensured to not make the same mistake. For this section, we also only used heights of 7cm and 15cm. For section 5, it only took 3 tries to get a fully successful run. Data and Calculations Section 3 v t (m/s) Trail h = 15 cm h = 25 cm 1 1.58 2.31 2 1.47 1.86 3 1.43 2.27 4 1.49 2.12 5 1.41 1.86 Table 1. Theoretical velocity, v f h = 15 cm h = 25 cm = = 1.71 m/s 𝑣 = 2𝑔ℎ 2(9. 8𝑚/𝑠 2 )(0. 15𝑚) = =2.21 m/s 𝑣 = 2𝑔ℎ 2(9. 8𝑚/𝑠 2 )(0. 25𝑚) Table 2. Section 4 v t (m/s) Trail h = 7 cm h = 15 cm 1 1.00 1.50
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
2 0.97 1.47 3 0.98 1.48 4 1.05 1.43 5 1.04 1.47 Table 3. Theoretical velocity, v f h = 7 cm h = 15 cm = = 1.17 m/s 𝑣 = 2𝑔ℎ 2(9. 8𝑚/𝑠 2 )(0. 07𝑚) = = 1.71 m/s 𝑣 = 2𝑔ℎ 2(9. 8𝑚/𝑠 2 )(0. 15𝑚) Table 4. Section 4 Figure 1. Highest point (H) 0.766m Distance= H–L =0.766m–0.367m =0.399m Lowest Point (L) 0.367m Max down v after H -0.83 m/s Amplitude=A Distance=2A A= =0.200m 0.399𝑚 2 Max v after L 0.83 m/s Table 5.
Height spring without mass: 122.35cm Height spring with mass: 65.15cm y 0 = –0.572m k= 𝑚𝑔 𝑦 0 = = –8.57 N/m (0.5𝑘𝑔)(9.8𝑚/𝑠 2 ) −0.572𝑚 y M =center of mass of 0.5kg weight= 0.024m Mass at highest point and KE=0, Energy=E H E H = 1 2 𝑘(𝑦 ? + 𝐴) 2 + 𝑚𝑔(ℎ 0 + 𝐴) = 1 2 (− 8. 57?/𝑚)(0. 024𝑚 + 0. 200𝑚) 2 + 0. 5•9. 8𝑚/𝑠 2 (0 + 0. 2 =0.765 J Mass at maximum down v after H, Energy=E 01 E 01 = 1 2 𝑚𝑣 2 + 1 2 𝑘𝑦 ? 2 + 𝑚𝑔ℎ 0 = (0.5kg)(-0.83m/s) 2 + (-8.57N/m)(.024m) 2 +(0.5kg)(9.8m/s 2 )(0) 1 2 1 2 =0.175 J Mass at lowest point and KE=0, Energy=E L E L = 1 2 𝑘(𝑦 ? − 𝐴) 2 + 𝑚𝑔(ℎ 0 − 𝐴) = 1 2 (− 8. 57?/𝑚)(0. 024𝑚 − 0. 200𝑚) 2 + 0. 5•9. 8𝑚/𝑠 2 (0 − 0 = -1.11 J Mass has maximum up v after L, Energy=E 02 E 02 = 1 2 𝑚𝑣 2 + 1 2 𝑘𝑦 ? 2 + 𝑚𝑔ℎ 0 = (0.5kg)(0.83m/s)+ (-8.57N/m)(.024m) 2 +(0.5kg)(9.8m/s 2 )(0) 1 2 1 2 =0.175 J Table 6. Questions 1. Energy is not conserved if friction or other non-conservative forces are present. Why? When a non-conservative force acts on a system, this work adds or removes mechanical energy to the system that is not accounted for in the conservation of energy. 2. Horizontal motion does not contribute to the PE. Why? Since we are only concerned with gravitational potential energy, only this y-axis is considered. This becomes more transparent through a free body diagram in which gravity is directed downward and opposing forces, be it the Normal force or frictional force if it is non-conservative, is directed upwards.
3. Why is it critical for the rubber tube to be perpendicular to the photogate beam. The photogate works by projecting an infrared beam to a sensor. Since the rubber tube has a hole in the center, if it is not perpendicular, this hole will cause discrepancies in the data as the object falls. This also increases the consistency of the data since Capstone is programmed with the specific diameter of tube. 4. Is there any friction in this experiment. If so, how would it affect your data? As the object is falling, since this is still a real-world application, air friction is present. As a result, since a non-conservative force is present, the energy can not be conserved. 5. Is there conservation of energy observed? Why or why not? Explain. As previously stated, due to the presence of air friction, it is expected that the energy will not be conserved. Through the data collected and calculated, such as in Table 6, it is supported that the conservation of energy was not observed. 6. As the pendulum swings down the string exerts a force on the mass. Does this force contribute to the PE? Why or why not? The force of the pendulum does not contribute to the PE. This can be seen in multiple ways. For one, the string is of negligible mass and can also be considered an internal force. Furthermore, since the path of the pendulum can be seen as half of a circular path, the tension force is directed inwards, perpendicular to the path. If W=Fd=Fdcos(90º)=0. 7. What contributes to the change in PE for the pendulum? Since the change in PE is given by mgh , since the mass and acceleration due to gravity remain the same, the change in height of the pendulum results in the change in PE. 8. What are the units of angular frequency? Since angular frequency, , measured angular displacement per unit time, it can be represented as degrees/sec or radians/sec, but rad/sec is typically more customary.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
9. Does your intuition about the motion correspond to what the graphs are displaying? Yes, my intuition about the natural sinusoidal oscillations of a spring’s motion matches that of the general shape of my graphs in Figure 1. 10. Is the acceleration maximum or minimum when the velocity is zero? When the velocity reaches zero after its maximum point, the acceleration is at a minimum. On the other hand, when the velocity returns to zero after dropping to it’s minimum, the acceleration is at a maximum. In other words, the two graphs appear to be 90º out of phase. 11. When the velocity is maximum, is the acceleration maximum or minimum? When the velocity is maximum, the acceleration is zero. This is expected since acceleration is the derivative of velocity. 12. Is there kinetic energy that is not given by ½ mv 2 ? If energy is conserved, there would be no other kinetic energy. However, if friction is present, KE is being lost. 13. Why would energy vary at each point? Energy varies at each point because when the object is at its highest and at rest, kinetic energy is zero and all the energy comes from potential energy. As the object falls and h decreases, the potential energy becomes kinetic energy. Since friction is present, however, some of this kinetic energy is converted to thermal energy that is not accounted for. As such, the energy does not appear to be conserved. 14. Is energy conserved? Based on the data calculated in table 6, while the energy from the maximum up and down velocities is conserved, the energy from the maximum to minimum heights, H and L, are not conserved. 15. What factors might introduce error into your measurements and calculations?
In addition to air friction, since a photogate is being used, not using an index card or slight variations in the movement of the string my lead to errors. 16. Will friction affect your experimental results? Yes, friction will affect the experiment results. As previously explained, friction leads the the appearance of energy not being conserved. 17. Is there any evidence of friction in the curve of position vs time graph? Explain. In the position vs. time graph, the minimum distance the mass travels downwards decrease slightly with each successive cycle. This indicates that perhaps friction is present, leading to the mass not travelling as far. Error Analysis Section 3 Standard Deviations h =15 cm SD of individual trials Mean: 1.48 SD: 6.62•10 -2 SD between v t and v f Mean: 1.52 SD: 1.12•10 -1 h= 25 cm SD of individual trials Mean: 2.08 SD: 2.16•10 -1 SD between v t and v f Mean: 2.11 SD: 2.00•10 -1 Section 4 Standard Deviations h =7 cm SD of individual trials Mean: 1.01 SD: 3.56•10 -2 SD between v t and v f Mean: 1.04 SD: 7.34•10 -2
h= 15 cm SD of individual trials Mean: 1.47 SD: 2.55•10 -2 SD between v t and v f Mean: 1.51 SD: 1.01•10 -1 The low standard deviation between the data in the individual experimental trials indicate a consistency in the data collection and low frequency of random errors. When the theoretical value was included, the standard deviation increased. While this increase still still within an acceptable range, it still emphasizes the difference between the experimental and theoretical values. Conclusion Through this experiment, I became even more comfortable with the Capstone database and the photogate sensor. I also became very familiar with the calipers and will always make sure to double check the units at the end of the measuring apparatus I am using. It was also valuable to see the formulas for Kinetic Energy, Potential Energy, Work and total Energy in a physical sense. The use of the spring was also helpful in better understanding how a spring constant is found. Finally, and most importantly, it was seen the effect that a non-conservative force, such as friction, has on the conservation of energy. Resources Halliday, David, Robert Resnick, Jearl Walker. Fundamentals of Physics, 11th Edition. Wiley, 05/2018. VitalBook file. Experiment #6: Conservation of Energy, NYU Physics department, https://physics.nyu.edu/~physlab/GenPhysI_PhysII/Final%20Draft%20of%20General%20Physic s%20I%20write%20ups/Conservation-of-energy-General-Physics-10-22-2016.pdf
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help