There are several elements of critical thinking throughout the readings Week 4 Discussion
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University Of Arizona *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
499
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by TwinNumberOne
There are several elements of critical thinking throughout the readings. The five elements that
stuck out to me were:
1.
Look into facts without prejudice-having the ability to look at facts without having
biasness about the facts prior to researching the facts.
2.
Leave emotions out of it - a lot of times our emotions will override our critical thinking
when dealing with a situation that involves having to make a critical decision.
3.
Can differentiate between facts and opinions-being able to search the facts and verify the
facts over opinions that are brought into the writings.
4.
Can change my thoughts based on new facts that are brought up.
5.
Make sure views are backed up by facts-having the critical thinking ability to back up my
views with sustainable facts.
I discovered an article titled "7 Ways to Improve Your Critical Thinking Skills" on Forbes.com
that I believe demonstrates good critical thinking skills. Glenn Leibowitz, the author, outlines
seven specific ways for readers to improve their critical thinking skills. The advice is all practical
and actionable, and Leibowitz backs each one up with scientific evidence. Tip #1, for example, is
"Learn to recognize and avoid logical fallacies," and Leibowitz includes a list of common
fallacies along with explanations for each. This article, in my opinion, demonstrates good critical
thinking skills because it gives readers specific, concrete ways to improve their thinking skills
and is based on solid research. I think this article demonstrates good critical thinking skills
because it provides readers with specific, concrete ways to improve their thinking skills, and it is
based on sound research.
.
I think this is a good example of critical thinking because it shows that the author has put thought
into how to improve critical thinking skills and has backed up his claims with research.
An example of an author or speaker who lacks good critical thinking skills were, in a recent
article on the website Natural News, author Mike Adams claims that vaccines are causing autism
in children. Adams cites a number of studies that he claims support his claim, but none of these
studies have been peer-reviewed or published in a reputable scientific journal. In fact, many of
the studies that Adams cites have been debunked by other scientists.
Adams's article is an example of a lack of critical thinking skills because he fails to evaluate the
evidence carefully. He simply cites studies that support his preconceived notions, without
considering the evidence that contradicts his claims. Additionally, Adams fails to consider the
possibility that there could be other explanations for the increase in autism rates, such as
environmental factors or changes in diagnostic criteria.
it can be seen as an example of a lack of critical thinking skills for several reasons like
1.
Lack of reliable sources: Citing studies that have not undergone rigorous peer review or
publication in reputable scientific journals raises concerns about the validity and
credibility of the information presented. Good critical thinking involves evaluating the
quality of sources and relying on well-established scientific research.
2.
Ignoring scientific consensus: The claim that vaccines cause autism contradicts the
overwhelming consensus among the scientific community, which has repeatedly
debunked the notion. Critical thinking entails acknowledging and considering the
consensus reached by experts in the field.
3.
Cherry-picking data: If Adams selectively cites studies that support his claim while
disregarding the broader body of scientific research, it demonstrates a bias known as
cherry-picking. Critical thinking involves considering a wide range of evidence and
viewpoints before forming conclusions.
4.
Failure to distinguish correlation from causation: The claim that vaccines cause autism
oversimplifies a complex issue. Good critical thinking requires understanding the
difference between correlation (two events occurring together) and causation (one event
causing another) and avoiding drawing premature or unsupported causal relationships.
Adams's article is a reminder that we should be critical of the information that we read online.
Not all sources of information are created equal, and it is important to evaluate the credibility of
the source before accepting the information as fact.
Adams's article is a reminder that we should be critical of the information that we read online.
Not all sources of information are created equal, and it is important to evaluate the credibility of
the source before accepting the information as fact.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2021/07/15/health-ranger-chronicles-refuting-mike-adams-covid-vaccine-
scare-stories-15665
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help