HW1B S Chpt 1 2 3 Ethics & Moral Reasoning & Conscience and Moral Devel S
doc
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Broward College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1001
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
doc
Pages
2
Uploaded by EarlEnergyMoose44
HW 1B Ethics (Introduction, Moral Reasoning, Conscience & Moral Development)
Name:
Ethics - Philosophy (Love of Wisdom)
Objective: Engage initial concepts and questions to gain personal insight and prepare for in-class dialogue.
1)
Respond to at least one of the following questions:
a)
What is a specific
question
(related to our class) that stands out to you now (from class, the reading, etc.)? Why does it stand out?
b)
What
statement
, made by another student, stands out to you now? Why does it stand out?
c)
What is one
concept
on which you gained clarity in our most recent class? What is one concept that is still unclear for you, and how can you go about
clarifying it?
A specific question that stands out to me so far is that “Why we should live in reality?”. The reason why is you only live once in your life, enjoy every
moment of your life as much as you can. I consider myself is an overthinker, and I’m always drown thinking about so many things that I’m not sure that if
they’re going to happen. Moreover, sometimes I take my life for granted by just living in dreams instead of dealing with daily struggles. By doing that, I feel
like I’m not living my life to the fullest since you will never what’s going to happen tomorrow when you wake up. Sometimes reality is harsh, but we need to
accept it to move forward in life. Learning to accept our present and our past is also the way to improve ourselves in the future.
2)
Provide an example of a “
moral dilemma
” that you have faced. (Ex. “Should I lie to my friend?”)
a)
A situation happened when I was in 8th grade. We were having a final Math test; I saw one of my close friends was cheating. It seemed like I was having the
most difficult struggle in my mind about whether I should tell the teacher or I should just pretend that I had never seen her cheating.
b)
How did you resolve this
dilemma
– or – how might this dilemma be resolved? (What would be required to resolve it?)
This dilemma was resolved eventually when our teacher caught my friend cheating herself. I'm not sure what would be the best solution for this situation.
However, I think getting caught cheating can help my friend learn a lesson from her mistakes.
3)
Provide at least 3 examples of
descriptive
statements and 3 examples of
prescriptive
statements (look up these terms in our book):
Descriptive
Statements - Examples
Prescriptive
Statements - Examples
Donald Trump was elected to be the 45th president of the United States.
The United States is an ethnic and racial diverse nation.
Over 675 million people in the world have been affected by the COVID-19
pandemic.
People should be treated equally regardless of race, ethnicity, or skin color.
It is necessary to have stricter laws to limit individuals to own weapons, especially
guns.
It should be legal for all women to have the right to get an abortion.
4)
What, do you think, is the difference between a “
well-justified
” claim and a “
poorly justified
” claim? Use examples
to enhance your response.
"Well-justified" claim refers to reasonable and valid statements. For example, Ma'Khia Bryant, a 16-year-old black girl was fatally shot by an Ohio police officer in
2021. The majority of people, especially those who support "Black Lives Matter" consider this case poorly justified. However, the camera footage on the police
officer's body reveals that Bryant was attempting to attack other two people with a knife. Based on reliable proof from the police, Bryant's killing case is well
justified.
5)
In your own words, address this question: What is the difference between knowing
what is right and actually doing
what is right most of the time? Provide an
example and make use of a statement or concept from the chapter in your response.
Knowing the right things is when an individual acknowledges what is right without taking any action. They choose to keep the right things in their mind. For
example, the teacher had a review for the test by asking some students to solve the questions on the board; however, one of the students got the wrong answer
and you found the right answer yourself. You decided to not speak up and keep it to yourself. Doing what is right requires individuals to go beyond knowledge
and turn it into actions. For instance, you see a friend getting bullied by a group of other friends at school, so you are aware that bullying is wrong. You would
dissuade those students and report it to the teacher or parents. Thus, you decide to do something instead of ignoring it.
6)
Read about
Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development
and respond to the following:
a)
Create a diagram or picture to illustrate the 3 main levels of Kohlberg’s explanation of moral development. Label each section.
b)
Read through the excerpt from Kohlberg’s writing. Use that and Boss’s words to add detail to help describe each level on your diagram.
Preconventional Morality
Stage 1
Behavior pushed avoiding punishment
Stage 2
Behavior pushed by rewards and self-interest
Conventional Morality
Stage 3
Behavior pushed by gaining social acceptance
Stage 4
Behavior pushed by maintaining social order and
obey authority
Postconventional Morality
Stage 5
Behavior pushed by social contracts and
Stage 6
Behavior pushed by moral principles
©Kimber 2023
HW 1B Ethics (Introduction, Moral Reasoning, Conscience & Moral Development)
individual basic rights
7)
Indicate on your diagram (you may need to look up some of these terms/concepts in the glossary):
a)
What level do you think ethical subjectivism
belongs in? Why does it belong there?
-
I think it belongs to post-conventional morality because there is no objective standard, ethical subjectivism is based on an individual’s thoughts or
feelings without explanations or facts.
b)
What level do you think cultural relativism
belongs in? Why?
-
I think it belongs to conventional morality because it is about understanding a culture on its own terms rather than judging it according to our own
standards; therefore, requires acceptance from society.
c)
What level do you think utilitarianism
belongs in? Why?
-
I think it belongs to post-conventional morality because it is about actions that make the best consequences for each individual like happiness or
pleasure.
d)
What level do you think deontology
belongs in? Why?
-
I think it belongs to post-conventional morality because it involves making moral decisions based on ethical principles.
e)
Where do you think Socrates
belongs? Why?
-
I think it belongs to post-conventional morality because he totally believes in moral standards.
f)
Where do you
belong? Why?
- I belong to post-conventional morality because I prefer doing what make me truly happy than what other people think but always prioritize moral
standards.
8)
(Challenge) How is the “
care
” perspective different from Kohlberg’s perspective? (Take a minute to reflect on the concept of care.)
-
The difference between them is view of morality. The care perspective focuses on caring and relationships, while Kohlberg’s perspective is more about
justice morality.
9)
What do you think it means to be angry
at the right time? Use an example
in your response.
-
Being angry at the right time is when you have the right purposes and appropriate reasons to get angry. For example, getting angry for something
wrong such as bullying, mass shootings, or discrimination.
©Kimber 2023
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help