Methods and Going to the Cross Quiz

docx

School

Liberty University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

220

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

10

Uploaded by UltraSteelMink10

Report
Quiz: Methods and Going to the Cross Due   Feb 5 at 11:59pm   Points   50   Questions   25   Time Limit   60 Minutes Instructions The quiz: Covers all   Learn   materials from   Module 3:   Week 3. Contains   25 multiple-choice and true/false   questions. Is   limited   to   60 minutes. Allows 1 attempt . Is   worth 50 points . Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module 3: Week 3. Attempt History Attempt Time Score LATEST Attempt 1 22 minutes 46 out of 50  Correct answers are hidden. Score for this quiz:  46  out of 50 Submitted Jan 19 at 2:51pm This attempt took 22 minutes.  
Question 1 2 / 2 pts Cornelius Van Til is the father of which apologetic model?    Classical    Evidential    Presuppositional    Experiential/Narratival   Question 2 2 / 2 pts The Evidential method of apologetics is known as the “two-step method.”    True      False     Question 3 2 / 2 pts Conversion is ultimately dependent on the work of the Holy Spirit. Apologetics is simply means  through which the Spirit can accomplish that end.    True      False     Question 4 2 / 2 pts According to the authors, the book of Matthew points to how Jesus’ death would forgive sin, but says little about how the Cross would heal the whole human person.   
True      False     Question 5 2 / 2 pts True apologetic wisdom is gained by all of the following practices, except:    Following exemplars within the community of faith.      Memorization of factual knowledge.      Living the daily struggle of the cruciform life.      Breaking bread as the body of Christ.     Question 6 2 / 2 pts Apologetics should be seen as a tool to clear  debris  from the path of unbelievers.    True      False     Question 7 2 / 2 pts Living lives of virtue and wisdom was not intended to make Christians stand out from everyone else in culture.    True  
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
   False     Question 8 2 / 2 pts The theologian Kevin Vanhoozer stresses that good apologetics is more about which of the following?    Character formation    Becoming the right sort of person    A person of apologetic virtue    All of the above   Question 9 2 / 2 pts A proponent of  hard  classical apologetics would insist that a logical argument for theism  must  precede a historical argument for the resurrection of Jesus.    True      False     Incorrect Question 10 0 / 2 pts According to the authors, the climax of the biblical narrative is the virgin birth, deity, and healing miracles of Jesus.    True      False    
Question 11 2 / 2 pts It must be remembered that apologetic “prooftexts” such as 1 Peter 3:15 and Philippians 1:27 are written to suffering communities; Christian joy and peace even amidst persecution is itself an effective apologetic before unbelievers.    True      False     Question 12 2 / 2 pts N. T. Wright’s book  Simply Christian  serves as an example of a  soft   version of which apologetic type?    Classical    Evidential    Presuppositional    Experiential/Narratival   Question 13 2 / 2 pts Our deeds form part of the apologetic process and according to the chapter the corporate body of Christ should be distinguished by these things:    Long-suffering Testimony    Personal Transformation    Holistic Service    All of the above
   Both A and B   Question 14 2 / 2 pts According to the chapter, the Gospel is not the same thing as Apologetics    True      False     Incorrect Question 15 0 / 2 pts Which of these could be considered a weakness of evidence-based approaches to apologetics?    They focus too narrowly on persuasion that appeals to the mind.      They lack an appreciation for humans in different situations.      Scripture should ultimately determine what counts as a "good" argument, not human reason.    All of the above.      Only A and B.     Question 16 2 / 2 pts Christian virtues like love, hope, faith, justice, and courage are often not sufficient of a catalyst for apologetic conversations to take place.    True
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
     False     Question 17 2 / 2 pts Reformed Epistemology responds to the objection that even if Christianity happens to be true, it would not be rational to believe in it due to a lack of evidence.    True      False     Question 18 2 / 2 pts The authors suggest that the best apologetic methods are person-specific.    True      False     Question 19 2 / 2 pts Those who have been transformed by the Spirit of God are to display _________ and _________ in response to skeptical critics    gentleness and contempt    respect and gentleness    gentleness and reason    None of the above
  Question 20 2 / 2 pts One of the strongest arguments for contextualization is that the gospel itself occurred and was recorded in a cultural context. The gospel must always be communicated in a way that the culture understands.    True      False     Question 21 2 / 2 pts The “minimal facts” approach of Gary Habermas is a “soft” example of which apologetic type?    Classical      Presuppositional      Evidential      Experiential/Narratival     Question 22 2 / 2 pts The goal of Presuppositional apologetics is to explicitly undermine a non-Christian’s worldview    True      False  
  Question 23 2 / 2 pts An unbeliever’s misunderstanding of the gospel may be worsened when a Christian is:    Unfaithful to the gospel message.      Inflexible in the way the gospel is presented.      Both A and B.      Neither A nor B.     Question 24 2 / 2 pts According to the chapter, modern Christians have much to learn from the early church regarding what aspect of apologetics?    Commitments to the poor    The role of reason    Apologetic arguments    Both A and C   Question 25 2 / 2 pts Adherents of the “soft” versions of their apologetic type are (rightly) resistant to other types of apologetic arguments.    True  
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
   False   Quiz Score:  46  out of 50