Project 2
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
IHP-610
Subject
Medicine
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
23
Uploaded by kailyndbiggar
1
9-1 Project Two
Kailynd A. Biggar
Graduate Nursing, Southern New Hampshire University
IHP-610:
Health Policy and Law
Dr. Tim Reardon
February 11, 2024
2
Introduction
Health Policy Issue
According to Larson et al. (2022) a feeling of uncertainty and reluctance over vaccination
prior to a determination to act (or not act) is known as vaccine hesitancy. It signifies a period of both potential and vulnerability (Larson et al., 2022). New degrees of unpredictability surrounding vaccine hesitation have been shown by multiple polls that were performed to assess opinions toward vaccination against the COVID-19 virus (Larson et al., 2022). Larson et al. (2022) states that this unpredictability is especially evident when the hesitancy is driven by social
media platforms. Key Stakeholders and Interest Groups
Larson et al. (2022) states that the stakeholders who will be most impacted by this health policy concern include state employees, unvaccinated adults, and public health professionals/agencies. Increases in vaccination reluctance frequently follow the release of new data, updated regulations, or updated reports of vaccine hazards (Larson et al., 2022). A portion of the diversity can be attributed to elements like a waning public confidence in specialists, inclinations toward complementary and alternative medicine, political division, and radicalism based on beliefs (Larson et al., 2022). This issue affects those who are most vulnerable due to factors like cost and mobility constraints, lack of insurance and ability to afford insurance, religious beliefs, inadequate education and guidance from medical professionals, and a lack of knowledge regarding immunizations.
Influence on Decision Making
Stakeholder Needs
3
APIC (2021) states that according to public health experts and institutions as many people as possible should receive vaccinations. When a large percentage of the population is immune, a phenomenon known as herd immunity arises, which hinders the disease's ability to spread to new victims (APIC, 2021). Since germs transmit swiftly from person to person, an outbreak occurs when a sufficient number of people in a community contract the disease (APIC, 2021). It will be difficult for the disease to spread if enough people receive vaccinations (APIC, 2021). The National Adult Immunization Plan (NAIP) is a summary of the steps that federal and nonfederal partners must do to safeguard the public's health and attain the best possible mitigation of infectious illnesses and their aftereffects through adult vaccination (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2022). Four main objectives are outlined in the plan, and each is backed up by strategies and targets to help with implementation (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2022). The objectives are to fortify the infrastructure for adult vaccinations, enhance community demand for adult vaccinations, boost access to adult vaccines, and promote technological and developmental innovation in adult vaccines (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2022). The NAIP acknowledges that in order for the initiative to be successful, state, local, territorial, and tribal governments, healthcare providers, advocacy organizations, vaccine manufacturers, academic institutions and research, payers, health plans, employers, and members of the public must come together to remove obstacles and improve adult vaccination access (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2022). Health Policy Influence
Politicians, public health experts, and government agencies such as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention can all have a substantial nonfinancial impact on this health policy concern (Larson et al., 2022). However, the government, legislators, and pharmaceutical
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
businesses all have a subtle or covert nonfinancial impact over this as well. Healthcare professionals have a financial impact. For instance, if a vaccination is provided, the patient's insurance will pay for it; if the patient doesn't have insurance, the vaccination will be at the patient's expense (Larson et al., 2022). The financial component for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention comes from the contracts with private medical professionals and the vaccine purchasers when it comes to the practicalities of who will produce and deliver the vaccine to healthcare providers (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2022). Benefits and Disadvantages
Public health experts and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) may gain from this issue since more people will be motivated to remain immune as a result of knowing how important vaccinations are to the community. Profit will rise as vaccination rates rise because vaccine reluctance will decline (APIC, 2021). When one considers vaccine reluctance in practice, everyone involved will suffer financially from the drop-in vaccination rates. One downside for healthcare practitioners, as previously indicated, is that they might not receive payment if a patient does not have insurance. If the CDC has no contracts with healthcare
professionals to distribute the vaccine to, their profit decreases financial and nonfinancial. Adults who are not vaccinated and state workers are particularly vulnerable to this problem since
they risk losing their jobs, getting the illness, and suffering with it. Since immunizations stop diseases from infecting new persons (Larson et al., 2022). Immunizations can help underprivileged groups financially by reducing long-term hospital expenses (Larson et al., 2022).
The vaccine will lower the cost of medical care and illness treatments while also helping individuals avoid getting sick (Larson et al., 2022). If immunizations can stop a virus from
5
spreading further, then generations to come won't be able to contract the illness as history has shown (APIC, 2021).
Value Conflict Analysis
The rationale behind the implementation of certain vaccination policy is the potential for value conflict among stakeholders (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2022). The general population may believe that these regulations are not being put into place for public safety but rather purely for commercial benefit. Many stakeholders may be influenced by commercial margins to make irrational choices about vaccination programs (Larson et al., 2022).
State and government officials along with health care professionals may also experience value conflict. Many stakeholders may be influenced by commercial margins to make irrational choices about vaccination programs (Larson et al., 2022). Jamison et al. (2019) state that some refuse vaccinations because they think the government is only in it for the money. In 2018, a survey found that most participants mistrusted pharmaceutical corporations, believing them to be
driven solely by profit (Jamison et al., 2019). Jamison et al. (2019) states that a global problem is
the public's declining trust in vaccinations. Vaccine safety fears, the emergence of anti-vaccine organizations, the use of social media, the notion that vaccinations have been "victims of their own success," and an overall decrease in the trust of "expert" society are just a few of the many theories put up to explain this decline (Jamison et al., 2019).
General Decision Making
According to Lemke and Harris-Wai (2015) policymakers can be influenced by stakeholders. Public health experts, for instance, can conduct studies on the effectiveness of the vaccine as well as security and present their findings to legislators (Lemke and Harris-Wai, 2015). They can also offer information on the prevalence of morbidity and mortality in addition
6
to the present-day burden of diseases that compromise people's immunity (Lemke and Harris-
Wai, 2015). Nonfinancial stakeholder consequences must be considered since vaccination refusal
puts others at danger (Lemke and Harris-Wai, 2015). Lemke and Harris-Wai (2015) state that even those who have been immunized are susceptible to contracting infections from unvaccinated people. Even if certain vaccines include personal dangers, it is desirable for the public to receive vaccinations.
Influence on Financial Practices
Stakeholder Needs
Medical professionals are particularly vulnerable as they must interact with people who aren't immunized (Maneze et al., 2023). Infectious illness exposure is a concern for public health experts, staff members, and their families as well (Burki, 2021). It is necessary to meet these doctors' financial demands so that, in the event of a more dire circumstance such as the hospital closing or a doctor contracting an infection they can continue to care for their family (Burki, 2021). The financial benefits that could make vaccinations possible for the vulnerable population
and residents of underserved areas are crucial since the money will allow them to remove obstacles that prevent them from becoming immunized (Burki, 2021). It will assist lower the death rate and give individuals the ability to remain healthy even in the future by providing financial support and setting up vaccination locations close to underprivileged regions (Burki, 2021). Due to their safety and lack of financial constraints, physicians practicing in underprivileged communities would also be able to handle other concerns that may come into play in their patients' lives (Burki, 2021). Immunization programs will aid in the containment of diseases that could spread throughout the population (Burki, 2021). Future financial crises can be
avoided by making immunization investments in the stakeholders that have been identified
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
7
today. The simplest approach to manage and lessen the spread of the illness and its consequences
on social, economic, and public health is to invest in vaccinations now (Burki, 2021).
Financial Influence
Health policies are significantly influenced financially by public health agencies and personnel
(Spears, 2021). Support for these organizations may come from their stakeholders, which may have an impact on their policies (Spears, 2021). Health policies are secretly influenced financially by pharmaceutical companies (Spears, 2021). They sway lawmakers by ensuring that laws that will help them financially prevail (Spears, 2021). When deciding on health legislation for adult vaccination, it's critical to consider these factors because the public's personal interests may be subordinated to commercial interests (Spears, 2021).
Benefits and Disadvantages
Adult vaccination could have a financial benefit for public health organizations. Government and nonprofit groups to enhance the population's health may provide funds to these kinds of entities (Rodrigues & Plotkin, 2020). Funds obtained can assist with the actual expenses of immunization, including the price of the vaccine, program management facilities and medical professional retention (Rodrigues & Plotkin, 2020). An effective immunization program can lower a disease's prevalence rate, accompanying treatments and hospital costs, as well as morbidity and death (Rodrigues & Plotkin, 2020). There is a positive correlation between immunization rate and decreased risk of illness (Rodrigues & Plotkin, 2020).
According to Rodrigues and Plotkin (2020), adults as well as workers who are unvaccinated may suffer negative consequences such as job loss and an increased risk of illness. There is a chance of serious disease, which could lead to epidemics throughout the neighborhood (Rodrigues & Plotkin, 2020). Being unvaccinated can also result in expensive medical bills,
8
which some people may find burdensome (Rodrigues & Plotkin, 2020). Adults who are not immunized may also postpone getting treatment due to their health status (Rodrigues & Plotkin, 2020). College enrollment and travel limitations in particular nations are further drawbacks (Rodrigues & Plotkin, 2020). Enrollment in university programs necessitates the receipt of specific vaccinations, including but not limited to the TDAP, varicella, hepatitis B, and MMR (Rodrigues & Plotkin, 2020).
Vaccines may have an economic impact for those who are at risk since they will make them less predisposed to diseases that can be prevented by vaccines (Orenstein & Ahmed, 2017). Herd
immunity is crucial because it shields those who are vulnerable inadvertently (Orenstein & Ahmed, 2017). Vaccines that are advised are free. Guided vaccinations can eliminate expenses that keep in need communities from obtaining necessary vaccinations (Orenstein & Ahmed, 2017). The disadvantaged community can benefit from vaccination programs offered in areas with limited access by helping with travel, expenses, and time off concerns related to immunization availability (Orenstein & Ahmed, 2017).
Competing Value Conflicts
Two examples of potential value conflicts related to unimmunized adults are stress and fundings. For instance, during the pandemic, 50% of doctors went so far as to request temporary
accommodations, and 65% of doctors stated they urgently required monetary assistance (Brüssow, 2021). Due to the closure of at least 15 hospitals, medical professionals employed by health systems ran the risk of going bankrupt by year's end (Brüssow, 2021). Due to this, the pandemic made physician's already undesirable economic circumstances worse (Brüssow, 2021).
In an investigation on the reasons behind non-vaccination, sixty percent of adults who were unvaccinated stated they would be strongly persuaded to receive a vaccine if offered annuities in
9
the amount of $1,000 (Brüssow, 2021). According to Brüssow (2021), forty-five percent of those who had not received the Covid-19 vaccine stated that they would be educated on the importance
of vaccination but to do so by a $50 prize. According to Forni and Mantovani (2021), it is important to understand these value conflicts is when making decision regarding health policy because any incentives that are suggested will increase the number of individuals who choose to receive a vaccine. Some organizations are presently rewarding those who have received vaccinations with freebies (Forni & Mantovani, 2021). Vaccination rewards may be used to entice people to come out to receive a vaccine with their families and loved ones (Forni & Mantovani, 2021). To encourage a greater number of people to get vaccinated, the government has provided incentives for those who are not yet vaccinated (Forni & Mantovani, 2021). Once these individuals have gotten the injection, they will not want those who are near to them to remain unvaccinated (Forni & Mantovani, 2021). People will be motivated due to increased education to get the vaccination by providing incentives like placing immunization centers at workplaces (Casey et al., 2022). In addition, rewards might enable medical staff to administer shots to patients when they visit the hospital on a regular basis (Casey et al., 2022). It would be more convenient for individuals if a walk-up vaccination location could be established close to their homes and places of employment (Casey et al., 2022). This would eliminate the need for them to schedule an appointment and take time absent from employment (Casey et al., 2022).
It will be wiser to persuade all the unvaccinated adults to obtain the vaccine if healthcare incentives that make vaccination accessible are put in place (Mardi et al., 2022). Making them understand that getting immunized early will enable them to continue their economic and social endeavors earlier will allay most of their worries (Mardi et al., 2022). More individuals will get
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
10
vaccinated if reliable data is made available and the vaccine is made more affordable and accessible (Mardi et al., 2022).
Financial Decision Making
Mardi et al. (2022) states that while monetary rewards can encourage more people to get immunized, it is crucial to take financial stakeholder effect into account. By giving vaccinations for no cost, those who are at risk will not be concerned about paying for vaccines (Mardi et al., 2022). If receiving the vaccine is rendered accessible by reward and a decrease in the cost of receiving the vaccine, the number of people who will get the vaccine will also increase (Mardi et al., 2022).
Recommendation
Position Statement
The World Health Organization (2019) estimates that vaccinations presently avert two to three million deaths annually. This means that those that receive vaccinations will likely live longer, healthier lives (The World Health Organization, 2019). With this in mind, it would be advisable that the organization explore implementing new policy changes to support vaccination.
The likelihood of disease spreading to those who have no immunity and are unable to physically obtain vaccinations decreases with the number of immune individuals (The World Health Organization, 2019). An additional recommendation would be to expand the availability of vaccines (The World Health Organization, 2019). Eliminating the differences and inequities in vaccination access can help achieve this. For some, paying for vaccinations might be a financial hardship. Therefore, offering free or heavily discounted vaccinations may additionally assist to remove the financial obstacles. Increasing the public’s awareness of the effectiveness of vaccination is another way to improve vaccination rates.
11
References
APIC. (2021).
What is Herd Immunity? - APIC
.
https://apic.org/news/what-is-herd-immunity/
Brüssow, H. (2021). COVID‐19: vaccination problems.
Environmental Microbiology
,
23
(6),
2878–2890.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15549
Burki, T. (2021). Challenges in the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines worldwide.
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
,
9
(4), e42–e43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00129-6
Casey, S. M., Burrowes, S. a. B., Hall, T., Dobbins, S., Ma, M., Bano, R., Yarrington, C., Schecter-Perkins, E. M., Garofalo, C., Drainoni, M., Perkins, R. B., & Pierre-Joseph, N. (2022). Healthcare workers’ attitudes on mandates, incentives, and strategies to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A mixed methods study.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
,
18
(6).
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2022.2144048
Jamison, A. M., Quinn, S. C., & Freimuth, V. S. (2019). “You don’t trust a government vaccine”: Narratives of institutional trust and influenza vaccination among african american and white adults.
Social Science & Medicine
,
221
, 87–
94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.020
Larson, H. J., Gakidou, E., & Murray, C. J. L. (2022). The Vaccine-Hesitant moment.
The New England Journal of Medicine
,
387
(1), 58–65.
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra2106441
Lemke, A. A., & Harris-Wai, J. (2015). Stakeholder engagement in policy development: challenges and opportunities for human genomics.
Genetics in Medicine
,
17
(12), 949–
957.
https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.8
Maneze, D., Salamonson, Y., Grollman, M., Montayre, J., & Ramjan, L. M. (2023). Mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for healthcare workers: A discussion paper.
International Journal
of Nursing Studies
,
138
, 104389.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104389
Mardi, P., Djalalinia, S., Kargar, R., Jamee, M., Abdar, Z. E., & Qorbani, M. (2022). Impact of incentives on COVID-19 vaccination; a systematic review.
Frontiers in Medicine
,
9
.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.810323
12
Orenstein, W. A., & Ahmed, R. (2017). Simply put: Vaccination saves lives.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
,
114
(16), 4031–
4033.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704507114
Rodrigues, C., & Plotkin, S. А. (2020). Impact of vaccines; health, economic and social perspectives.
Frontiers in Microbiology
,
11
.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01526
Spears, M. (2021).
5 ways public policy impacts health
. The Sycamore Institute.
https://www.sycamoreinstitutetn.org/5-ways-public-policy-impacts-health/
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
The national adult immunization plan (NAIP)
. HHS.
https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/nvpo/national-adult-immunization-
plan/naip.pdf
World Health Organization. (2019).
Vaccines and immunization
.
https://www.who.int/health-
topics/vaccines-and-immunization#tab=tab_1
In simpler terms financial value conflict can exist when personal
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
13
financial gain of a party is
deemed dishonest, inaccurate, inefficient and unfair. Many people who are vaccine hesitant are so as they do not trust to government agencies like the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as they
believe that they are only
administering vaccines for profit and are not taking the necessary steps
14
to make sure that they are safe. In today’s world
with the COVID-19 pandemic many people in
the general population believe that the vaccine was rushed to completion
and not tested enough in terms of long-term effects on the body as the government just wanted to make money off of the vaccines. Since the CDC has a lot to
15
financially gain from the creation and quick roll out of vaccines it creates vaccine hesitancy as it can appear that they are only making them for money and not considering the safety and well-being of the individuals receiving the vaccines.
In simpler terms
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
16
financial value conflict can exist when personal financial gain of a party is
deemed dishonest, inaccurate, inefficient and unfair. Many people who are vaccine hesitant are so as they do not trust to government agencies like the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as they
believe that they are only
administering vaccines for profit and are not
17
taking the necessary steps to make sure that they are safe. In today’s world
with the COVID-19 pandemic many people in
the general population believe that the vaccine was rushed to completion
and not tested enough in terms of long-term effects on the body as the government just wanted to make money off of
18
the vaccines. Since the CDC has a lot to financially gain from the creation and quick roll out of vaccines it creates vaccine hesitancy as it can appear that they are only making them for money and not considering the safety and well-being of the individuals receiving the vaccines.
In simpler terms
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
19
financial value conflict can exist when personal financial gain of a party is
deemed dishonest, inaccurate, inefficient and unfair. Many people who are vaccine hesitant are so as they do not trust to government agencies like the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as they
believe that they are only
administering vaccines for profit and are not
20
taking the necessary steps to make sure that they are safe. In today’s world
with the COVID-19 pandemic many people in
the general population believe that the vaccine was rushed to completion
and not tested enough in terms of long-term effects on the body as the government just wanted to make money off of
21
the vaccines. Since the CDC has a lot to financially gain from the creation and quick roll out of vaccines it creates vaccine hesitancy as it can appear that they are only making them for money and not considering the safety and well-being of the individuals receiving the vaccines.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
22
In simpler terms financial value conflict can exist when personal financial gain of a party is
deemed dishonest, inaccurate, inefficient and unfair. Many people who are vaccine hesitant are so as they do not trust to government agencies like the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as they
believe that they are only
administering vaccines
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
23
for profit and are not taking the necessary steps to make sure that they are safe.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help