Gordon-McIntosh- Physics Lab 1

pdf

School

University of Ottawa *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1122

Subject

Mathematics

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

3

Uploaded by ProfessorLion1229

Report
Shea Gordon-McIntosh 1) Distance Running Question 1a: Based on the data shown in Table 1, student 1 is a stronger runner. Student 1 ran at a consistently quicker pace than student 2. Student 1 takes less time to complete each lap. Calculation 1a: Average time per lap = (total time/number of laps) Student #1: 333s/6 laps Student #2: 393s/6 laps = 55.5 s/lap = 65.5 s/lap Calculation 1b: Student #1: = Student #2: = 53. 5/6 55. 5/6 = 2.986s = 3.041s SE= 2.986/ SE= 3.041/ 6 6 = 1.219s = 1.241s Table 1: Table 1- Individual and average lap times, and standard error for two students Time 1 (s) Time 2 (s) Time 3 (s) Time 4 (s) Time 5 (s) Time 6 (s) Average time per lap (s/lap) Standard Error (s) Student 1 55 57 50 56 55 60 55.5 1.219 Student 2 64 64 64 68 71 62 65.5 1.241 Calculation 1c: Average speed = (total distance/total time) Student #1: v= (400m x 6)/ 333s Student #2: v= (400m x 6)/ 393s = 7.21 m/s = 6.11 m/s Calculation 1d: Student #1: v = 1/0.1378 Student #2: v = 1/0.1659 = 7.25 m/s = 6.03 Question 1b: Student #1: % difference = (7.21-7.25)/(½ (7.21+7.25)) x100 = 0.55% Student #2: % difference = (6.11-6.03)/(½ (6.11+6.03)) x100 = 1.3%
Shea Gordon-McIntosh 2) Projectile Motion Calculation 2a: Average value of range = total range for angle/5 25°: 7.905m/5 35°: 9.71m/5 45°: 10.325m/5 50°: 10.14m/5 60°: 8.935m/5 70°: 6.62m/5 = 1.581m = 1.942m = 2.065m = 2.028m = 1.787m = 1.324m Calculation 2b: Range = (v 2 sin(2Θ))/g g= (4.5) 2 /2.068 = 9.79 m/s 2 Question 2: % error = | (accepted − experimental)/accepted | × 100% = ((9.81-9.79)/9.81) x 100% = 0.20% Calculation 2c: i) Theoretical time to reach maximum height = (4.5)(sin(60°))/9.81 = 0.397 s ii) Theoretical maximum height above launch point = (4.5) 2 sin 2 (60°)/(2)(9.81) = 0.77 m iii) Theoretical maximum range = (4.5) 2 (sin(2x60°))/9.81 = 1.79 m 3) Ferris Wheels Calculation 3a: Radius (m) = (diameter/2) x 0.3048 Wheel #1: r= (36ft/2) x 0.3048 Wheel #2: r= (28ft/2) x 0.3048 = 5.486m = 4.267m Calculation 3b: Average period of rotation = total time/5 Wheel #1: 82.5s/5 Wheel #2: 68.5s/5 = 16.5s = 13.7s Uncertainty = Uncertainty = 3.8/5 = 0.4 = 0.8 Calculation 3c: Average speed = ω x radius Wheel #1: ω = 2π/T Wheel #2: ω = 2π/T
Shea Gordon-McIntosh = 2π/16.5s = 2π/13.7s = 0.38 rad/s = 0.46 rad/s v = (0.38 rad/s) x 5.486m v = (0.46 rad/s) x 4.267m = 2.08 m/s = 1.96 m/s Centripetal acceleration = v 2 /radius Wheel #1: (2.08m/s) 2 /5.486m Wheel #2: (1.96m/s) 2 /4.267m = 0.789 m/s 2 = 0.900 m/s 2 Question 3: The second wheel operator was correct when he stated that his wheel provided a bigger thrill for his riders because the second wheel's centripetal acceleration is larger. The second wheel’s centripetal acceleration is 0.900 m/s 2 , while the first wheel’s centripetal acceleration is 0.789 m/s 2 .
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help