I-2 Final Proposal
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
East Carolina University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1251
Subject
Mathematics
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by stephanieharris568
PHYS 1251
Describing Motion Along a 2D Plane
Section 1: During the investigation, students were expected to access a ball and its motion up and
down an incline. This concept can answer the guiding question, “does a ball on an incline have
the same acceleration on its way up as its way down?” As Newton second law states, force is
equal to the mass and acceleration. The larger the mass, the more force that is required to create
acceleration. The ball in this case did not have a large mass (around 20.0 grams (
g
)), so the force
was relative to the size for this investigation. To evaluate the ball’s acceleration, there are several
factors that need to be calculated, such as the position of the ball. The ball’s position can be
classified as a vector because it has a direction. To trace this vector, a Tracker software recorded
the position and time of the ball – key points of data to collect as they help determine velocity.
Velocity is the change in position over a change in time. As the software recorded the ball, it
captured points along a manually entered distance. Using this information, the group calculated
the velocity of the ball leading to the ability to determine acceleration. Acceleration is the change
in velocity over a given time. Given that the relative force of Earth’s gravity is constant, the ball
should be expected to experience the same acceleration uphill as it does downhill.
Section 2:
As previously mentioned, this investigation utilized Tracker software that was connected
to a camera and displayed a video image on a computer screen. The camera captured a ball being
pushed up an incline and allowed to freely fall down the incline, twice. After setting the point
and distance in the software, it created a series of data points which were exported to an Excel
document. Using this information, the velocity was calculate using the equation (
x
f
−
x
i
)
(
t
f
−
t
i
)
. Let “x”
equal the position and “t” equal time. In the Excel document, velocity and time data points were
used to create a graph and create what is known as a linear regression. Finally, from this
regression, the acceleration was determined along with the uncertainties of both the uphill and
downhill points. As with any investigation, there were some sources of error that needed to be
reduced such as the inclination and choosing one person to place force on the ball. Firstly, by
completing the trial twice at different inclines, once at 70˚ and again at 43.5˚, this allowed the
investigation to have variety. If the ball had the same acceleration upwards and downwards as a
smaller angle, then a larger angle would most likely not make a difference. Secondly, by ensuring
only one person applied force to the ball, the acceleration would not increase/decrease due to the
amount of force applied. It kept the force consistent, essentially. For the sake of reference, the
70˚ angle will be referred to as “angle A” and the 43.5˚ will be referred to as “angle B”. Section 3: A ball on an incline has the same acceleration as it goes uphill as it goes downhill. In this
investigation, the uncertainties for both accelerations upward and downhill inclines of angles A
and B were combined by using δc
=
√
(
δa
)
2
+
(
δb
)
2
. To find the overall uncertainty, we then used
C
=
√
δc
(
δa
a
)
2
+(
δb
b
)
2
. Following these equations, this produced an uphill uncertainty of (0.05±
0.04) m/s² and a downhill uncertainty of (0.10 ± 0.04) m/s². Since the uncertainties do not have a
significant difference, they can be considered statistically similar. Figure 1:
position and time graph for 70˚ for Figure 2: position and time graph for 43.5˚ for
upward and downward. upward and downward.
Figure 3:
velocity/time graph for 70
˚ downhill Figure 4:
velocity/time graph for 43.5˚ downhill
Figure 5
: velocity/time graph for 70
˚ upward
Figure 6: acceleration/time graph for
43.5
˚ upward
Upward data for
angles 70˚and 43.5˚
Downward data for
angles 70˚ and 43.5˚
Acceleration
0.05 m/s
0.10 m/s
Uncertainty
0.04 m/s
0.04 m/s
Regression
70-degree angle, Uphill = 0.0956
Downhill = 0.5806
43.5-degree angle,
Uphill = 0.0674
Downhill = 0.5529
Table 1: linear regression data in correlation to the angles Regarding the limitations of this investigation, the camera’s precision could have
captured more data points. The data points were primarily captured manually and in certain
frames. The software seemed to have captured the ball at differing points so there were
potentially some data points that were missed. If the computer was able to capture more data
points, it could have made for more accurate position tracking. In comparison to group three, their results concurred with the data above. Group three
stated that the data they collected had a difference of best estimate was 0.05 m/s² and the sum of
uncertainty was 0.33 m/s². In contrast to the angles, group three used a smaller change in incline
because they theorized that if the acceleration was different or same, the inclination would not
have much of an effect. With another comparison, group six had reported contrasting results,
stating that a ball has different acceleration upward and downward. It is unclear if they used two
people to roll the ball but as previously stated, using multiple people could have an influence on
the force applied to the ball. They had reported the difference of best estimate as 0.089 m/s
²
and
an uncertainty of -0.02. Arguably, there is not a significant difference.
Section 4:
After reading the review of one of my peers, I decided to include information about
Newton's second law of motion, which states F = ma, per suggestion. In section two, I included
the reasoning in having a drastic change in the angle difference since it could strengthen the
claim. Lastly, I decided to create one sentence for discussing the uncertainties. I reread it a few
times and it did not make sense in its original form. Truthfully there was not much of their advice
that I disagreed with. I did also have to make a few change in my own work since I incorrectly
reported data.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help