R1Final_Knordle_K

Residency 1 Final Assignment Part 1 Instructions: For each of the seminar cohort sessions you attend during Residency 1, you will write a reflection; including key takeaway thoughts, share the resources and skills you learned about, and then you’ll select two additional prompts related to that seminar, to address in detail. Type your answers directly into the tables. Part 1: Seminar Reflections Seminar 1: Building Your Identity as a Scholar Key Take Away: (Reflective thoughts; 2-3 sentences.) Walden University's mission reflects a commitment to empowering career professionals to evolve into scholar-practitioners capable of driving positive social change. This vision embraces a dynamic educational approach, where knowledge is not only valued but also measured by its real-world applicability in addressing pressing societal issues, ultimately contributing to the betterment of the global community. Resources and skills I learned from this seminar: (Bulleted list or paragraph)  Doctoral Degree Coach Website  Resources for time management  Resources for technology management -Writing Center  Family Support Systems  Work Support Systems Choose two of the following prompts to complete. 1. How will you use your degree to contribute to positive social change? 2. Describe at least 3, time management or technology strategies you plan to implement to maintain a strong work, home, and school balance. 3. Identify your most important support systems and the ways you plan to strengthen those supports. 4. Explain what it means for you to be a scholar and to use your scholarly voice. Write your reflection for prompt # Prompt 1 As a future Doctor of Clinical Psychology, I am deeply committed to harnessing the knowledge and skills I have acquired to make a meaningful impact on society. I aspire to use my degree to contribute to positive social change by providing mental health services to underserved and marginalized communities, advocating for improved access to mental health care, and conducting research that informs evidence-based interventions for mental health issues. Through my work, I hope to reduce the stigma surrounding mental health, promote psychological well-being, and create a more equitable and compassionate society where individuals from all backgrounds can access the support they need to lead fulfilling lives.

Write your reflection for prompt # Prompt 4 Being a scholar to me means not only acquiring knowledge but also actively engaging with it, questioning, and critically analyzing information. It involves a commitment to lifelong learning and a dedication to expanding one's horizons and contributing to the collective body of knowledge. Using my scholarly voice means that I have a responsibility to share my insights and findings with others, to engage in meaningful discussions, and to communicate my ideas effectively, whether through writing, research, or teaching. It's a way to influence and shape conversations, challenge the status quo, and make a positive impact on my field of study and society as a whole. In essence, being a scholar and using my scholarly voice is a continuous journey of intellectual growth and a commitment to fostering positive change through knowledge and discourse.

cornerstone of academic excellence, enriching the quality and rigor of both coursework and dissertation research. Write your reflection for prompt # Prompt 6 The role of ethics for doctoral students varies in coursework compared to the dissertation phase. In coursework, students are generally introduced to the ethical foundations of research and scholarship, learning the principles and guidelines that should govern their academic pursuits. They are expected to uphold ethical standards in their assignments, group projects, and interactions with peers and faculty. In the dissertation phase, the ethical responsibilities become even more critical. Doctoral students are tasked with conducting their research, which often involves human subjects, data collection, and analysis. At this stage, the responsibility to adhere to ethical principles intensifies. This includes obtaining informed consent from participants, ensuring the confidentiality and anonymity of data, and following ethical guidelines set by their institution and relevant professional associations. Doctoral students must also grapple with the ethical challenges that can arise during research, such as conflicts of interest or the responsible handling of sensitive information. Seminar 3: Scholarly Research and the Walden Library Key Take Away: (Reflective thoughts 2-3 sentences.) Scholars are like intellectual explorers, navigating a vast sea of information. They embrace the challenges of research, understanding that creativity, adaptability, and persistence are vital as they traverse a diverse landscape of information sources. These scholars appreciate the serendipitous nature of discovery, recognizing that the journey towards knowledge is often as valuable as the destination. Resources and skills I learned from this seminar: (Bulleted list or paragraph) I've learned the importance of thorough and systematic planning. The process entails obtaining IRB approvals, a critical step that necessitates attention to detail. It's clear that collaboration with my dissertation chair and methodologist is pivotal in ensuring that the IRB application is complete and well-prepared, as it's subject to revisions based on their feedback. Additionally, I've gained an understanding of the

potential need for multiple IRB approvals, which highlights the complexity of research projects, especially if they involve multiple sites. This experience underscores the significance of navigating the regulatory and ethical aspects of research meticulously and reinforces the idea that research is not just about data collection but also about adhering to rigorous ethical standards. Choose two of the following prompts to complete. 1. What is the importance of a scholarly mindset? 2. Describe the differences between scholarly and non- scholarly sources. 3. Share what you learned about how to find scholarly research at the Walden Library. 4. How can you match the source to your need? 5. Share about what you learned in evaluating a scholarly research article. Reflection for prompt # Prompt 1 A scholarly mindset is of utmost importance in the context of the dissertation process described. It emphasizes the need for rigorous and methodical approaches to research, ensuring that the project is ethically sound and academically credible. Such a mindset underscores the significance of attention to detail, thoroughness, and a commitment to academic standards. Scholars in this process must exhibit a keen awareness of the ethical considerations related to research, as evidenced by the requirement for IRB approvals. They must engage in a critical and iterative process, being receptive to feedback and making necessary revisions. Ultimately, a scholarly mindset encourages a deep respect for the academic process and a dedication to producing work that is not only relevant but also ethically and methodologically sound, which is essential in the pursuit of advanced degrees and the advancement of knowledge. Reflection for prompt # Prompt 2 Scholarly and non-scholarly sources differ significantly in their content, credibility, and purpose. Scholarly sources, often found in academic journals, are written by experts in a particular field, undergo rigorous peer review, and are characterized by in-depth research, citations, and a formal, structured style. They aim to contribute to the body of knowledge within a specific discipline and are highly reliable for academic research. In contrast, non-scholarly sources include popular magazines, websites, and social media

3. Describe what you learned about how to work with search results, apply filters, and locate full text. Write Your Reflection for prompt # Prompt 1 Google Scholar and the Walden Library databases offer distinct approaches to conducting academic research. Google Scholar provides a comprehensive search across a vast array of academic disciplines and sources, making it suitable for preliminary explorations of a topic. However, this breadth can lead to a potentially overwhelming number of results, some of which may lack peer-reviewed or reputable sources. Conversely, the Walden Library databases are thoughtfully curated collections of academic resources tailored to the specific fields of study at Walden University. These databases offer a more focused and refined search experience, with a higher likelihood of finding peer-reviewed articles, dissertations, and other scholarly materials directly relevant to one's academic needs. Furthermore, the library databases often provide tools for refining searches, enabling users to pinpoint the most pertinent and up-to-date sources. In summary, Google Scholar is useful for initial research, while the Walden Library databases are the preferred choice for scholars and students seeking trusted, discipline-specific, and high- quality academic resources. Reflection for prompt # Prompt 2 Developing effective search terms and search strings using Boolean search terms was a valuable lesson in optimizing the precision and relevance of online searches. I learned that Boolean operators, such as "AND," "OR," and "NOT," are powerful tools for refining search results. "AND" narrows down results by ensuring that all terms are present, making it ideal for finding highly relevant sources. "OR" broadens the search by including any of the terms, which can be useful when searching for synonyms or related concepts. "NOT" is valuable for excluding specific terms that might lead to irrelevant results. By strategically combining these Boolean operators and terms, I discovered that I could construct more intricate and customized search queries. This approach not only saved time by reducing the number of irrelevant results but also enhanced the overall quality and relevance of the information I retrieved during my searches. Understanding and employing Boolean search terms effectively is an indispensable skill for any researcher or student looking to harness the full potential of online databases and search engines.

focus of the argument, establishing clear parameters for what will be addressed in the academic work. The thesis statement also needs to be grounded in evidence, signifying the type of evidence or reasoning to be employed in substantiating the argument. Furthermore, it should guide the organization and structure of the work, ensuring that every element contributes to supporting, elaborating, or defending the thesis statement. Demonstrating the relevance and significance of the argument is essential, conveying why the topic merits exploration and its potential implications. Finally, it is crucial to be open to revision and refinement as research progresses, as the thesis statement may evolve as more information and insights are gathered. Adhering to these principles ensures that the thesis statement effectively underpins the academic argument, offering a clear and compelling focal point that steers research, analysis, and the presentation of ideas. Write your reflection for prompt # Prompt 4 Plagiarism is the unethical act of using someone else's work, ideas, or words without giving them due credit and presenting it as one's own. It undermines the principles of intellectual honesty and originality, making it a serious academic and ethical offense. To prevent plagiarism, it is essential to cite sources correctly by employing recognized citation styles like APA, MLA, or Chicago. When directly quoting from a source, use quotation marks and provide proper source citations. Paraphrasing and summarizing should be done meticulously, ensuring the content is entirely in one's own words while still attributing the original source. Plagiarism detection tools can help identify unintentional plagiarism, and detailed note-taking during research can prevent accidental inclusion of others' work. Understanding copyright and fair use guidelines, acknowledging common knowledge, planning assignments well in advance, and consulting academic integrity policies are all integral in avoiding plagiarism and upholding the standards of intellectual honesty in academic work. Seminar 6: Preparing for the Dissertation Journey: Faculty Panel Describe which faculty experiences and perspectives on the dissertation journey impacted you most and Dr. Howard's profound experiential insights and scholarly perspective on the doctoral dissertation expedition left an indelible impression on me, primarily due to her elucidation of the ultimate significance of this rigorous undertaking. Dr. Howard consistently demonstrated a candid and forthright approach in her guidance, effectively conveying

why. (Reflective thoughts, 2-3 sentences.) the inherent challenges and expectations that lay ahead for us as aspiring scholars. Her counsel emphasized the vital necessity of establishing a robust support network and, notably, suggested proactively engaging in psychological well-being practices such as therapy, thereby equipping us with the psychological tools and resilience necessary to navigate the arduous journey toward academic achievement. Resources and skills I learned from this seminar: (Bulleted list or paragraph) This particular session bore an inherent sense of personalization, rendering it conducive to my scholarly growth. Within this educational forum, I acquired a comprehensive comprehension of the intricate facets of the dissertation process. A salient lesson pertained to the acknowledgment that individuals embark upon this academic odyssey with disparate temporal commitments, elucidating the diverse durations required for completion. Furthermore, I gleaned insights into the multifarious avenues available to navigate the dissertation journey, shedding light on the myriad potential pathways. The overarching message conveyed was the challenging nature of this endeavor, juxtaposed with its attainability, underlining the adage that where there exists a resolute will, there invariably exists a discernible path. Choose two of the following prompts to complete. 1. From what you heard the faculty panel share, what individual opportunities and challenges are you now anticipating related to the dissertation journey? What will you do with the new knowledge? 2. What new strategies for work/home/school balance did the panel discussion bring to your attention? How will you apply this new knowledge? 3. Describe your plan for building and maintaining a support system for the doctoral journey. Write your reflection for prompt # Prompt 2 The panel discussion introduced several novel strategies for achieving an equilibrium between work, home, and school responsibilities that have significantly resonated with me. Among the notable insights were the following: 1. Prioritization and Time Management, which entails setting clear goals, establishing a schedule, and adhering to it rigorously. 2. Delegation and Support Networks, such as utilizing childcare services and leaning on colleagues and family members for assistance. 3. Self-Care and Well-

Resources and skills I learned from this seminar: (Bulleted list or paragraph) I learned a multitude of valuable resources and skills from the seminar covering APA style, plagiarism prevention, and proper citation formatting in APA style. Firstly, I gained an in-depth understanding of the intricacies of APA style, enabling me to write academic papers with precision and consistency. Additionally, I acquired strategies to avert plagiarism and uphold academic integrity, emphasizing the ethical importance of giving credit to original sources. Moreover, I developed the skills necessary to meticulously format citations and reference lists in accordance with APA guidelines, ensuring that my academic work maintains transparency and adheres to the rigorous standards set by Walden University. These newfound resources and skills have equipped me to produce scholarly work that is not only well-organized and credible but also reflective of my commitment to academic honesty and excellence. Choose two of the following prompts to complete. 1. Describe why APA style is used for academic writing at Walden University. 2. Describe strategies to avoid plagiarism and write with academic integrity. 3. What did you learn about how to properly format a citation and reference list using APA style? Reflection for prompt # Prompt 1 APA (American Psychological Association) style is the chosen format for academic writing at Walden University for several compelling reasons. Firstly, it ensures clarity and uniformity in scholarly documents, making it easier for readers to navigate and comprehend academic work. The use of APA style also enhances the credibility and professionalism of academic writing, as it is widely accepted in academic and professional circles. Additionally, it aligns with Walden University's commitment to academic integrity by emphasizing proper source citation and attribution. The structured guidelines for in-text citations and the creation of a references list are vital for ensuring that all source materials are appropriately credited and traceable. Furthermore, APA style fosters precise and concise writing, which is crucial for the effective communication of complex ideas, promoting scholarly discourse. Lastly, it equips students with valuable skills and knowledge necessary for their future professional endeavors, as many fields related to Walden Reflection for prompt # Prompt 3 I learned that properly formatting citations and reference lists in APA

style involves adhering to specific guidelines to ensure consistency, accuracy, and proper attribution of sources. In APA style, in-text citations typically include the author's last name and the publication year within parentheses, with specific formatting for direct quotations and paraphrased content. Additionally, I learned the importance of using the "References" page to compile a comprehensive list of all sources used in the document, following specific formatting rules for different types of sources, including books, journal articles, websites, and more. The reference list should be organized alphabetically by authors' last names and include essential details such as the title, publication date, and source information. Overall, these guidelines ensure that citations and reference lists are consistent, transparent, and follow the established conventions of APA style.

prompt # paradigms in research, offer fundamentally different perspectives on the nature of reality and knowledge acquisition. Positivism asserts the existence of an external, objective reality and relies on empirical evidence obtained through controlled experiments to uncover universal truths. It seeks to discover knowledge through systematic observation and measurement. In contrast, Constructivism, or Interpretivism, challenges the idea of an objective reality, positing that reality is actively constructed by individuals. Here, knowledge is not discovered but actively constructed by researchers and participants, with an emphasis on capturing diverse individual perspectives, experiences, and subjective interpretations. The choice between these paradigms significantly influences research design, data collection methods, and the interpretation of findings, underlining the importance of aligning the chosen paradigm with the research's philosophical foundations and goals. Optional: Asynchronous Module Seminar: Preparing for the Dissertation Journey: Student Panel Describe which student experiences and perspectives on the dissertation journey impacted you most and why. (Reflective thoughts, 2-3 sentences.) Resources and skills I learned about from this seminar: (Bulleted list or paragraph) Choose two of the following prompts to complete. 1. Based on what you heard the students share on their panel, what opportunities and challenges do you now anticipate during your own dissertation journey? What will you do with this new knowledge? 2. What new strategies for work/home/school balance did the panel discussion bring to your attention? How will you apply this new knowledge? 3. Describe your plan for building and maintaining a support system for the doctoral journey. Write your reflection for

prompt # Write your reflection for prompt # Part 2: Action Plan Based on what you've learned in Residency 1, and aligned to the outcomes for the seminars, choose one skill or area where you would like to grow in the next month. In the table below, describe a SMART goal as your action plan. Examples of skills you might choose:  Writing Skill: Start a feedback journal o Learning and Growing from Instructor Feedback o Starting a feedback journal  Writing: Submit a paper for MyPass paper review and apply feedback to future writing.  Life Skill: Build my work and home support group.  Library Skill: Research more library search skills and apply to a current course to find scholarly resources.  Research Skill: Research bibliography software, pick one to try and add resources from coursework to software.  Research Skill: Identify Walden resources related to developing a problem statement.  Research Skill: Use Guiding Questions to evaluate empirical research I’m reading for my courses.  Research Skill: Begin a dissertation researcher journal where I will jot down ideas from coursework related to topics I want to explore for my dissertation.

Final Assignment Rubric All parts of the final assignment must be completed. Any “none” or “N/A” answers will earn 0 points for that session’s points. And any 0-rating will earn an unsatisfactory score for the final assignment. Residency 1 Final Assignment Criteria 0—Element Missing 1 to 2—Below Expectations 3—Meets minimal expectations 4 to 5--Exceeds Expectations 1 Building Your Scholarly Identity One or more answers are missing, an answer of “none” is given for one or more items, or the answers are not acceptable (not on topic, not comprehensible, etc.) Minimal evidence of reflection and responses do not make it evident that student attended the session or met the seminar’s objectives. Adequate evidence of reflection that shows student minimally met the seminar objectives in terms of key take aways; listed resources, and two additional prompts. Thorough and detailed reflection shows that student exceeded meeting the seminar objectives in terms of key take aways; listed resources, and two additional prompts. (2) Critical Thinking for Doctoral Scholarship One or more answers are missing, an answer of “none” is given for one or more items, or the answers are not acceptable (not on topic, not comprehensible, etc.) Minimal evidence of reflection and responses do not make it evident that student attended the session or met the seminar’s objectives. Adequate evidence of reflection that shows student minimally met the seminar objectives in terms of key take aways; listed resources, and two additional prompts. Thorough and detailed reflection shows that student exceeded meeting the seminar objectives in terms of key take aways; listed resources, and two additional prompts. (3) Scholarly Research and Walden Library One or more answers are missing, an answer of “none” is given for one or more items, or the answers are not acceptable (not on topic, not comprehensible, etc.) Minimal evidence of reflection and responses do not make it evident that student attended the session or met the seminar’s objectives. Adequate evidence of reflection that shows student minimally met the seminar objectives in terms of key take aways; listed resources, and two additional prompts. Thorough and detailed reflection shows that student exceeded meeting the seminar objectives in terms of key take aways; listed resources, and two additional prompts. (4) Searching for Scholarly Information One or more answers are missing, an answer of “none” is given for one or more items, or the answers are not acceptable (not on topic, not comprehensible, etc.) Minimal evidence of reflection and responses do not make it evident that student attended the session or met the seminar’s objectives. Adequate evidence of reflection that shows student minimally met the seminar objectives in terms of key take aways; listed resources, and two additional prompts. Thorough and detailed reflection shows that student exceeded meeting the seminar objectives in terms of key take aways; listed resources, and two additional prompts.