Aneshea DeSuza leadership The American Prosecutor in Historical Context by Joan Jacoby
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Monroe Community College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
112
Subject
Law
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by niquisha
Aneshea DeSuza
Professor Samuel Wright
Leadership in the Criminal Justice System
15th September 2023
The American Prosecutor in Historical Context by Joan Jacoby
As I read the article, I was impressed by Joan Jacoby's description of the substantial
authority and independence enjoyed by American prosecutors. It's interesting to read that US
prosecutors have unchecked discretion and are locally elected authorities (Klofas et al., 1989, p.
16). This degree of independence is a heavy burden, especially when it comes to making sure
that justice is administered fairly and in accordance with community values. I also value the
emphasis on the prosecutor's job as a problem solution rather than merely a case processor
. It is
clear that the American criminal justice system has difficulties balancing its objectives with those
of the community (Klofas et al., 1989, p. 16). This gap emphasizes the necessity for prosecutors
to interact with the public actively and work proactively to address the underlying causes of
crime. It makes sense to put prosecutors and victim advocates in the areas where crime is most
widespread because it reflects a more comprehensive and neighborhood-focused approach to
criminal justice.
A significant idea is the change from a "offense"-based system to a "offender/victim"-
based system. It stresses a deeper understanding of offenders, their threats to the neighborhood,
and the necessity of victim restitution and rehabilitation (Klofas et al., 1989). This change is
consistent with the restorative justice theory, which holds promise for lowering recidivism and
fostering community healing.
I support the essay for a number of reasons. First, I agree with the idea that prosecutors
should be problem solvers rather than just case processors. Criminal justice need to be more than
merely harsh punishment; it should work to address the root causes of crime and advance social
welfare. A more equitable and effective judicial system cannot be achieved without this attitude
change. Second, it is vital to place a focus on fostering community involvement and trust. The
legal system and the community can work together more effectively, share information more
quickly, and ultimately create safer areas through building trusting relationships. It supports the
notion that localities need to have a say in determining their own level of safety. Last but not
least, the suggestion to create an Evidence-Based Decision Making (EBDM) framework is a sane
progression. Relying on statistics and thorough academic research can assist to better manage
resources, find successful solutions, and decrease the rate of recurrent imprisonment.
Additionally, it demonstrates a dedication to evidence-based policymaking, which is crucial for
any system looking to enhance results. Transparency and Accountability, Community Outreach and Education, Restorative
Justice Programs, Data-Driven Policies, and Community-Based Prosecution are some of the
recommendations I would make to strengthen the connection between the community and the
District Attorney's office.
Transparency in business practices should be a top priority for the District Attorney's
office. This involves improving public access to information about cases, judgments, and results.
Creating accountability and feedback systems for the community, such as community advisory
boards, can also promote trust (Opportunity Agenda: Transforming the System, n.d.). Through
frequent meetings and educational initiatives, prosecutors should actively interact with the
community (Goldkamp et al., 2002). These initiatives can aid in demystifying the legal
procedure, outlining the functions of prosecutors, and fostering constructive connections.
Restorative justice initiatives can help mitigate the suffering caused by crimes and engage the
community in the healing process (Dandurand et al., 2006). These initiatives must to be
customized to each community's unique requirements and preferences. Adopting an Evidence-
Based Decision Making (EBDM) framework is essential, as was indicated in the article. The
District Attorney's office may guarantee that resources are deployed efficiently and actions are
supported by evidence by using data to influence policies and choices (Klofas et al., 1989, p. 16).
As suggested in the article, placing prosecutors and victim advocates in the neighborhoods most
impacted by crime might encourage direct interaction and problem-solving. Additionally, it can
aid prosecutors in developing a better comprehension of the wants and requirements of the
community.
In summary, strengthening ties between the community and the district attorney's office
necessitates a multifaceted strategy that places an emphasis on openness, participation, data-
driven judgment, and a move toward restorative justice ideals. These actions might contribute to
the creation of a judicial system that is more receptive to the requirements and ideals of the
communities it serves.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Reference
Klofas, J., Stojkovic, S., & Kalinich, D. B. (1989). Criminal Justice Organizations:
administration and management (6th ed.). http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA10151196
Press Release from the Colorado Evaluation and Action Lab & Omnia Business Systems. (2023,
July 19). MOVE TO PROMOTE MORE JUST AND TRANSPARENT PROSECUTION
GROWS TO INCLUDE MORE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS’ OFFICES. Colorado’s 17th Judicial
District Attorney’s Office Serving the Residents of Adams and Broomfield Counties.
https://adamsbroomfieldda.org/blog/12122/MOVE-TO-PROMOTE-MORE-JUST-AND-
TRANSPARENT-PROSECUTION-GROWS-TO-INCLUDE-MORE-DISTRICT-ATTORNEYS-
OFFICES
Opportunity Agenda: Transforming the system. (n.d.). Transforming the System.
https://transformingthesystem.org/criminal-justice-policy-solutions/create-fair-and-effective-
policing-practices/promoting-accountability/
Goldkamp, J., Irons-Guynn, C., Weiland, D., & Crime and Justice Research Center. (2002). U.S.
Department of Justice. Community Prosecution Strategies: Measuring Impact.
https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/bja/192826.pdf
Dandurand, Y., Griffiths, C. T., & Crime. (2006). Handbook on restorative justice programmes.
http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA82654931