Untitled document.edited (45)

docx

School

Massachusetts Institute of Technology *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2

Subject

Law

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

6

Uploaded by AdmiralGorillaMaster1016

Report
Research Paper: The Conflict between Border Security and Human Rights Student's Name Institutional Affiliation Professor's Name Course Submission Date The Conflict between Border Security and Human Rights Abstract
Border security is essential to homeland security, national sovereignty, and our nation's economic prosperity. Human Rights ensure that we are all protected from abuse and promote fairness, equality, respect, and dignity. However, the two often conflict in our borders. The articles research fundamental human rights according to international law, where conflicts arise, and how to solve them. Citing an example of the US-Mexico borders, the paper unveils the unfairness travelers face at various borders and how they go against human rights. The research paper aims to demonstrate that we can have both border security and observance of human rights. Introduction The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is responsible for keeping our country safe by ensuring it controls the entry of people and goods into our borders (Department of Homeland Security, 2023). The priority of American border security is to keep away terrorists and any harmful weapons from the country and allow legitimate travelers and trade. In today's globalized world, more people cross international borders every day to pursue business, education, trade, or even seek asylum. In order to control illegal entry, border and transportation security have adopted technologies that gather, process, and share data to manage the migration flows. Many technological gadgets are used to screen goods and people to ensure no illegal person or thing passes the border. Screening procedures are fundamentals of intercepting and identifying people suspected of being terrorists or affiliated with terrorist acts (Abomhara et al., 2020). Some of the procedures followed by border security attract controversy on whether they adhere to international human rights law. International law obligates every nation worldwide to protect and respect every person's human rights despite their nationality, race, or age, even as they take precautions to prevent terrorism (UNCCT, 2021). Security officials are expected to be human rights conscious while screening travelers so that they can comply with the requirements of the international human rights law. Nonetheless, this is not always the case. Over the years, severe bridge complaints of human rights have occurred in our borders. Many migrants have faced human rights protection gaps in the land, sea, and air borders, especially when they are running from hardship and cannot seek protection from their transit countries. There have been many cases of arbitrary or prolonged detention, unlawful profiling, gender-based violence, ill-treatment, and dangerous interception practices in international borders. Our borders lack regular migration pathways and have punitive security migration laws and xenophobic rhetoric that end up increasing the risk of violation of human rights rather than mitigating them. The Important Human Rights in the Borders International laws require every country to protect, respect, and fulfill all human rights, even as they secure and manage our borders (UNCCT, 2021). Human rights apply to every person and are not optional; thus, border officials must put them into practice. Some of the fundamental human rights relevant to our borders include Right to be treated with dignity Right to life Right to leave and enter their country Right not to be forcefully returned to their country if there is a risk of harm
Right to be handled well as a human being in a transparent process per the law. Right to freedom from cruelty, torture, or any inhuman treatment Right to security Right to movement Right to privacy Freedom of expression Right to family reunification Right to a fair trial and due process Right to basic needs: health, water, food, and sanitation In addition, everyone has the right to privacy. Digital communications bring disputes to the right of privacy. According to the law, any surveillance measure must be publicly accessible, and the collection and processing of any data should be for legitimate reasons (Abomhara et al., 2020). The data should also be protected from any misuse. Any personal information collected by border officials should be for a justifiable, legitimate aim, non-discriminatory, reputed by law, and proportionate and necessary to the needs. When individual data is shared internationally, lawful procedures should be followed (Henriksen, 2023). For instance, no data should be shared with people who need international protection, like refugees. In addition, the law gives every person a right to due process, which entails the right to individual examination. Racial or ethnic profiling plus making decisions based on discrimination basis is against the human rights laws. Children, pregnant women, people with disabilities, or any other exceptional cases should be receiving special treatment according to their needs. Nonetheless, while most of these laws are clear, they are only sometimes followed in the borders. Unfortunately, most travelers and migrants are unaware of their rights or lack the means to fight for their rights. The Controversies Surrounding Border Control and Human Rights One of the major concerns that challenge human rights is the issue of asylum seekers. The country has laws to control and stop irregular migration (Henriksen, 2023). Nonetheless, it is a human right to seek protection from persecution in their countries. Most people who want to come to America and lack legal migration channels take advantage of fake asylum seekers (Sassen, 2019). These tendencies make the border security cast doubts on all refugees, making them set even more restrictive measures. In addition, there is also confusion between economic migrants and asylum seekers, resulting in a vast, complex procedure to prove there was persecution. The restrictions set to control migration affect the ability of genuine refugees to seek asylum, which violates their rights. Secondly, in the recent past, there have been severe cases of human smuggling and trafficking. There is evidence of cross-border human mobility businesses and many associated criminal activities (Sassen, 2019). There exist corrupt bodies that try to benefit from enabling people to bypass the strict migration laws when they desperately need to get onto American soil. In some ways, border controls even encourage smuggling, which is a violation of human rights. Thirdly, migration is costly and sometimes leads to loss of lives. Statistics show that at least every day, a migrant dies at the U.S.-Mexico border. In many cases, the gap in exposure of migrants to deaths, harsh conditions, and exploitation is again associated with strict migration laws (Staudt, 2022). Borders are, therefore, faced with significant ethical challenges trying to balance between controlling irregular migration and caring for human rights.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Migration is generally understood as a security threat, even without factual proof. Irregular migration and asylum crises have been associated with the destabilization of economies, drug trafficking, and every type of crime (Sassen, 2019). These perceptions leave very little space for consideration of human rights. The biggest concern is usually about striking a balance between allowing the free flow of trade and maintaining security in our borders. Human dignity and rights rarely play a role in the discussions. Many nations, including America, are reluctant to address migration from a rights-based perspective as other concerns seem more critical. The relationship between restrictive asylum policies and human smuggling is ignored. The government largely ignores deaths at the border and migrant vulnerability. Even when human rights violations are acknowledged, they are unrelated to migration policies. The interconnection between border security and human rights is a complex, ambiguous issue involving human agencies, policies, and government and their influence on border controls, human rights, and migration policies. It is hard to define who is to blame for what. For instance, if a migrant dies at the border, who is responsible? The government or the migrant who risked their life in an illegal immigration attempt. Should the transit country not be blamed for not caring for its citizens and allowing them to leave hazardous conditions without the correct documentation? It is a human right to leave one's country, but who is to blame if leaving exposes you to danger? The role of preventing human rights violations and control of migration is a complex issue to tackle. Human Rights Violations in the US-Mexico Border The US-Mexican border faces the most significant human rights crisis about border security and human rights. Thousands of people are believed to have died in the 120,00 miles Sonoran Desert on their way to the American border due to the harsh environmental conditions and lack of basic needs, along with other dangers (Staudt, 2022). In addition, various regimes of the U.S. government have criminalized migrants, exposing them to mistermed and discrimination (Staudt, 2022). The U.S. government, under Trump's demonstration, was accused of having cruel migration laws that deny refugees the right to seek asylum. The U.S. used COVID-19 as an excuse to expel thousands of migrants to danger and deny them the right to seek asylum. Many of the people turned away were exposed to kidnappings, violent attacks, and brutal conditions. Mexican asylum seekers have been illegitimately denied protection in U.S. ports and expelled back to their country, where they were running from persecution by cartels (Staudt, 2022). In addition, many migrants in the borders have cited verbal abuse from officials and severe discrimination even when in the country. Can States Restrict human rights? International human rights law provides the restriction of certain human rights in specific exception cases in alignment with the law (UNCCT, 2021). The restrictions cannot be discriminatory or arbitrary and meet the following conditions: They must have a clear legal basis. The person must understand what law allows for that restriction They must have a legitimate objective They must be necessary out of a social need
It must be the least restrictive measure applicable Be tailored to meet a target objective It must be discriminatory Striking a Balance between Border Security and Human Rights Maintaining border security and protecting human rights are the most essential obligations of any government. It is the responsibility of the American government to ensure its borders are well protected from any terrorist attacks and harm that come from the borders. Security is often deemed more relevant than observance of human rights (Henriksen, 2023). Cases whereby a country can choose to restrict a human right for security, must be related to bridging one right over another that is more important. America has repeatedly affirmed that security and human rights protection are mutually reinforcing and complementary, not conflicting objectives. Statistically, there is little evidence that terrorists use migration routes, for example, the US- Mexico border, to get into the country (Staudt, 2022). While states have the right to exercise jurisdiction within their borders and determine migration policies, they are expected to do this in full consideration of human rights. Adopting a human-based approach to border governance will help us develop an ideal, balanced way to run our borders effectively. Some principles may be very relevant in upholding human rights within our borders. 1. Human Rights should be primary . In all border governance activities, human rights should take pre-eminence. The domestic laws in the country should align with the international laws on human rights. The U.S. government should ensure they have implemented the legal requirements concerning how borders should operate. The measures set to address irregular immigration should not disadvantage the human rights and the dignity of the migrants (UNCCT, 2021). There should be outermost due process, ensuring everyone is examined individually and can appeal. The measures should work for the best interests of children and other vulnerable people. The Security Council should have a formula that quickly identifies criminals so innocent people are not unfairly victimized. 1. Non- discrimination No one should be discriminated against based on their social and economic situation, family and marital status, religion, political affiliation, nationality, age, disability, gender identity, health status, sex, language, color, property, or birth status (UNCCT, 2021). International law requires undifferentiated treatment for all migrants within borders. All the measures laid out to counter- terrorism, human trafficking, and any other illegal business should not be aimed at discriminating against certain people or be used as a basis for profiling some target people. Border security ensures that the official performs their duties responsibly and without prejudice. 1. Assistance and Protection from Harm Migrants have the right to be assisted at the borders and with respect. The laws addressing irregular immigration should aim at denying criminals and not victimizing innocent travelers. Also, anyone whose rights are violated at the borders can seek justice (UNCCT, 2021).
Conclusion The solution to the conflict between border security and human rights lies in the realization that there are not conflicting goals but complementary ones. While it is evident that human rights have been violated in American borders, little is being talked about. Security concerns should not nullify human rights, as the right to security is a human right. It is time that the government, NGOs, and the concerned agencies rise to act and protect human rights, even as they protect our homeland. References Abomhara, M., Yayilgan, S. Y., Shalaginova, M., & Székely, Z. (2020). Border Control and use of biometrics: Reasons why the right to privacy can not be absolute. Privacy and Identity Management. Data for Better Living: A.I. and Privacy , 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-42504-3_17 Department of Homeland Security. (2023). The Department of Homeland Security. Foundations of Homeland Security and Emergency Management , 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394191628.ch8 Henriksen, A. (2023). 9. international human rights law. International Law , 166–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192870087.003.0009 Sassen, S. (2019). America's immigration "problem." Race and Ethnic Conflict , pp. 223–238. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429497896-22 Staudt, K. (2022). Violence at the border: Human Rights along the U.S.–Mexico Border , 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2vt02s6.4 UNCCT. (2021). Human rights at international borders: A trainer's guide . United Nations Office of Counter Terrorism. https://www.ohchr.org/en/publications/training-and-education- publications/human-rights-international-borders-trainers-guide
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help