LenaEEDR8206-5

pptx

School

Northcentral University - Arizona *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

8206

Subject

Information Systems

Date

Oct 30, 2023

Type

pptx

Pages

Uploaded by lenae953201

Develop a Teaching Resource for Qualitative Data Analysis Erjola Lena Northcentral University

Introduction Coding Process in Qualitative Research Categorizing and Organizing Data ❖ Sorting and categorizing data for better management. ❖ Data segments are labeled or coded depending on their characteristics. ❖ Coding organizes similar information for easier interpretation and analysis (Smith et al., 2018). Identifying Patterns, Themes, and Trends ❖ Patterns, themes, and trends can be identified. ❖ Complex data sets are broken down into manageable units. ❖ Commonalities, relationships, and deviations can be identified. ❖ Ideas, concepts, or emotions are analyzed. ❖ Variables can be coded numerically or categorically allowing statistical analysis (Johnson & Brown, 2020). The Role of Relevant Literature ❖ Coding decisions are guided by existing theories, frameworks, and concepts. ❖ Validity is ensured by aligning the coding process with existing knowledge (Thompson, 2019).

Literature Review on Coding Process The coding process can be complex and subjective, so it is essential to rely on existing literature to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings. Validity ❖ The validity of a study is its ability to measure its intended outcomes. ❖ Reading the literature can help understand the data and the study context. ❖ The study's findings can be verified. ❖ Analyzing literature helps interpret data and draw valid conclusions. Reliability ❖ Repeating and coding data by multiple researchers ensures reliability. ❖ Data analysis can be improved by utilizing proven coding techniques from literature. ❖ Qualitative research can be enhanced by a comprehensive literature review.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Best Coding Practices Through Literature Review Grounded Theory ❖ Provides a structured framework for coding and analysis. ❖ Enables researchers to draw more reliable conclusions from the data. ❖ Increases the reliability of the results (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). Constructivist Approach ❖ Focuses on understandin participants' experiences and behaviors. ❖ Develops a theory by identifying patterns in data. ❖ Explores the underlying meaning of what is being studied beyond the data (Charmaz, 2006). Coding Techniques ❖ Open Coding - Researchers analyze data to identify concepts and themes, which are then used to create a set of categories. ❖ Axial Coding - Researchers link categories to each other to demonstrate their relationship. ❖ Selective Coding - Researchers focus on one or two key categories and explore them in depth.

Inductive and Deductive Coding Similarities and Differences Deductive Coding ❖ Known as priori coding - analyzes data using pre- existing theories or frameworks. ❖ Organizes and categorizes data from prior literature reviews. ❖ Focuses on the research questions. ❖ Saves time and ensures the area of interest is coded (Bloomberg & Volpe, 2019). Inductive Coding ❖ Known as emergent coding - develops codes directly from data. ❖ Does not rely on pre-existing theories or frameworks. ❖ Creates new codes and categories through a bottom-up approach. ❖ Allows patterns and themes to emerge naturally without preconceived notions or expectations. ❖ Explores new hypotheses when knowledge is limited (Creswell & Similarities Inductive & Deductive Coding ❖ Identify patterns and themes by categorizing and labeling data. ❖ Analyze the data rigorously and systematically. ❖ Identify meaningful insights and generate new knowledge .

Key Elements of Data Analysis 1. Problem Definition ❖ Identify the problem or objective of the analysis. ❖ Determine the variable of interest. ❖ Formulate research questions or hypotheses. 2. Data Preprocessing ❖ Cleaning data to ensure quality and integrity. ❖ Transform, normalize, and encode categorical variables for analysis (Wickham & Grolemund, 2016). 3. Data Analysis ❖ Various statistical techniques are applied to analyze the dataset. ❖ Memorizing the data. ❖ Coding the data. ❖ Codes become categories, and categories become themes (Montgomery et al., 2012) 4. Interpretation and Reporting ❖ Interpret the finding results ❖ Draw conclusions. ❖ Present the findings clearly and concisely.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Mock Coding Scheme Packing a Suitcase for a Beach Holiday 1. Beach Towel (BCH TOW) 2. Swimsuit (SWM SUT) 3. Sunscreen (SN SCRN) 4. Sunglasses (SUN GLS) 5. Flip Flops (FLP FLP) 6. Hat (HAT) 7. Beach Bag (BCH BAG) 8. Water Bottle (WTR BTL) 9. Beach Umbrella (BCH UMB) 10. Snorkel Set (SNRK ST) 11. Beach Chair (BCH CHR) 12. Beach Ball (BCH BAL) 13. Reading Material (RD MTRL) 14. Waterproof Phone Pouch (WT PCH):

Evaluating and Presenting Research Findings 1. Evaluating Research Findings ❖ Analyze the study's methodology ❖ Review the research design ❖ Sample size. ❖ Methods of data collection, ❖ Statistical analyses employed (Smith, 2018). Points to Remember ➢ After obtaining results, researchers must analyze them thoroughly and evaluate their importance and impact. This involves evaluating the statistical significance of the findings and determining their practical relevance (Johnson, 2019). ➢ When conducting research, it is crucial to consider both internal and external validity. Internal validity is about accurately measuring what the study intends to do, while external validity concerns the extent to which the findings can be applied to the broader

Evaluating and Presenting Research Findings 2. Presenting Research Findings ❖ Organize the information clearly and logically. ❖ Present the research objectives or key themes identified (Brown, 2016). Points to Remember ➢ Visual aids such as graphs, charts, and tables can be used to effectively illustrate the findings. These visuals should be designed in a way that enhances understanding and highlights the main points (Miller, 2020). ➢ Researchers should also provide a concise and accurate summary of the results, ensuring that they are presented in a manner that is accessible to the intended audience (Walker, 2018). ➢ Additionally, it is important to discuss the limitations of the study and any potential areas for future research. This demonstrates transparency and helps to contextualize the

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Evaluating and Presenting Research Findings Informing Decision-Making: 1. Evaluation and presentation of research findings are vital in informing decision-making processes. 2. Policymakers, practitioners, and other stakeholders rely on research to guide their actions and policies. 3. By effectively presenting research outcomes, researchers can bridge the gap between academia and practice, ensuring that evidence-based decisions are made. Promoting Knowledge Dissemination: 1. Evaluating and presenting research findings contribute to the wider dissemination of knowledge. 2. Through conferences, journals, and other platforms, researchers can share their findings with the scientific community and beyond. 3. This facilitates the exchange of ideas, fosters collaboration, and allows for the refinement and advancement of theories.

Reflective Questions Interviews 1. Interviews offer researchers a chance to engage in direct conversation with participants, facilitating a rich exchange of information. 2. Therefore, it is crucial to thoughtfully design interview questions that elicit meaningful responses from participants. 3. Open-ended questions encourage participants to share their personal experiences and opinions (Creswell & Poth, 2018). Focus groups 1. During a focus group, a researcher facilitates a group discussion where participants can share their experiences and generate new insights through interaction. 2. According to Creswell and Poth (2018), this method is particularly helpful when exploring complex social phenomena or when seeking diverse What are the best ways to involve participants' perspectives? How are these decisions made? continue Observations 1. Observations help to gain a better understanding of people's behaviors, interactions, and experiences in natural setting. 2. Taking detailed observational field notes is crucial for recording accurate observations and interpretations.

Reflective Questions Making Choices When conducting research, researchers need to take into account various factors including: ❖ the research question ❖ the characteristics of the participants, ❖ the context of the study. ❖ obtain informed consent ❖ maintain participant confidentiality (Creswell & Poth, 2018) What are the best ways to involve participants' perspectives? How are these decisions made?

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Reflective Questions Possibility of Participant Identification 1. In certain research studies, participants may accidentally be identifiable to readers. 2. This can occur when certain details or characteristics of the participants are accidentally revealed, or when data is not properly anonymized. 3. For example, if a study involves a small sample size from a specific demographic group, individuals who are familiar with that group may be able to identify participants based on the information provided (Bloomberg & Volpe, 2019). Could readers identify the participants? What are the potential risks to confidentiality? Risks to Confidentiality 1. Data Leakage: Sharing identifiable demographic details, geographical locations, or personal experiences can lead to data leakage and compromise confidentiality. 2. Re-identification: Improperly de- identifying participant data could lead to breaches of confidentiality and violations of privacy. Measures should be taken to prevent this. 3. Contextual Clues: Contextual clues may reveal participants to those familiar with the

Reflective Questions Validity of Data ❖ The data collected from interviews, observations, documents accurately represent the participants' perspectives and experiences. ❖ I often assume that participants are providing honest and reliable information. What assumptions do I bring to qualitative research? Ethical Conduct ❖ The research has been conducted ethically and that the participants' confidentiality and anonymity have been protected. ❖ I assume that I have obtained informed consent from participants and have followed ethical guidelines. Reflexivity ❖ I often assume that my own biases and preconceptions can influence the research process and outcomes. ❖ I aim for reflexivity, acknowledging and critically reflecting on my own role in shaping the study .

Reflective Questions Generalizability vs. Transferability ❖ I may assume that my findings may not be directly generalizable to a larger population. ❖ Instead, I focus on transferability, where the findings can be applied to similar contexts or settings. What assumptions do I bring to qualitative research? Open-Ended Nature of Inquiry ❖ I typically assume that the research questions are open-ended and exploratory. ❖ This allows participants to express their views and experiences in their own words. Contextual Relevance ❖ I may assume that the context in which the research takes place is crucial for understanding the phenomena under investigation. ❖ I often consider the social, cultural, and historical context of the participants.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Reference s Bloomberg, L. D., & Volpe, M. (2019). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A road map from beginning to end (4th ed.). Sage. Brown, A. (2016). Presenting research findings: A guide for researchers. London, UK: Routledge. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company. Johnson, A., Brown, S. (2020). Coding Strategies for Identifying Patterns in Quantitative Data. Journal of Quantitative Research, 22( 2), 98- 111. Johnson, S. (2019). Data analysis for researchers . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Jones, R. (2017). Research methods: An introduction for students and researchers. London, UK: Sage Publications. Miller, D. (2020). Exploring data analysis: A guide for students and researchers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Reference s Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2012). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. Wiley. Smith, J. (2018). Research methodology: A guide for students and researchers. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Smith, A., Jones, B., Johnson, C. (2018). The Role of Coding in Qualitative Data Analysis. Journal of Qualitative Research, 21 (4), 321-337. Taylor, J. (2019). Qualitative research for students and researchers . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Thompson, A. (2019). The Importance of Literature Review in the Coding Process. Journal of Qualitative Research, 20 (1), 67-78. Walker, J. (2018). Research design: A guide for students and researchers. London, UK: Routledge. Wickham, H., & Grolemund, G. (2016). Data Cleaning and Manipulation. In R for Data Science (O'Reilly Media).