Data Ethics

.docx

School

Grand Canyon University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

ITT-640

Subject

Information Systems

Date

Apr 30, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by MUG72640

Arkelly Kigoma Data Ethics College of Technology, Grand Canyon University  ITT-415: IT Business Case Planning for Global Enterprise   Instructor: Johnny Chang 04/21/2024 
The revelation of mass surveillance programs by Edward Snowden in 2013 ignited a global debate on the ethical implications of government agencies collecting data on citizens. This case raises complex questions about privacy, security, and the balance between individual freedoms and national interests. From a Christian perspective, which emphasizes principles of justice, love, and respect for human dignity, analyzing the Snowden leak involves grappling with these ethical dilemmas through a moral lens. Central to the Snowden leak is the tension between the government's duty to protect its citizens and the right to privacy inherent in human dignity. From a Christian worldview, every individual is seen as created in the image of God, with inherent worth and dignity (Genesis 1:27). This perspective underscores the importance of respecting individuals' privacy and autonomy, reflecting God's care for each person as unique and valuable. Moreover, Christian ethics often emphasize the importance of considering both intentions and consequences in ethical decision-making. While the surveillance programs may have been initiated with the intention of enhancing national security, their widespread and indiscriminate nature raises questions about their effectiveness and necessity (Proverbs 16:2). Research suggests that mass surveillance programs often yield limited results in preventing terrorist attacks while infringing on civil liberties (Greenwald, 2014). Therefore, the ethical justification for such programs becomes increasingly dubious when weighed against their potential harm to individual freedoms. Furthermore, the Christian tradition places a strong emphasis on the pursuit of
justice and the common good. While proponents of mass surveillance argue that it can help prevent terrorist activities and protect society from threats, the indiscriminate collection of data on millions of innocent citizens undermines the principles of justice and the common good (Micah 6:8). It fosters a climate of suspicion and erodes trust between the government and its citizens, ultimately undermining the fabric of society. In considering what this surveillance might have prevented, it is essential to acknowledge the inherent uncertainty of counterfactual scenarios. While proponents of mass surveillance often argue that it is necessary for preventing terrorist attacks, empirical evidence suggests otherwise (Ecclesiastes 8:7). Traditional investigative methods, such as targeted surveillance and intelligence sharing, are often more effective in thwarting terrorist plots (Greenwald, 2014). Moreover, the overreliance on mass surveillance may divert resources away from more fruitful avenues of counterterrorism efforts, such as addressing root causes of extremism and investing in community engagement initiatives. In conclusion, the Edward Snowden leak raises profound ethical questions about the use of information by government agencies. From a Christian perspective, the mass surveillance programs revealed by Snowden are deeply troubling as they infringe upon the inherent dignity and rights of individuals while yielding questionable benefits in terms of security. Ethical deliberation in this context necessitates a careful consideration of the balance between security and privacy, justice and liberty, and the common good.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help