HIS 100 Module Four Activity Narratives
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
100
Subject
History
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by sbthompsn
HIS 100 Module Four Activity: Historical Narratives
Locate an additional secondary source relevant to your historical event. Use all four of your sources (two primary and two secondary) to answer the questions below. Replace the bracketed text with your responses.
Identify the topic you chose to explore:
Chernobyl Attempt to write the APA style citations for your four sources. Include links to each source. You will not be penalized for incorrect citation format.
1.
HDA SBU, f. 11, spr. 992, t. 29. Originally published by the Center for Research into the Liberation Movement (TsDVR) together with the Ivan Franko National University of Lviv at http://avr.org.ua/index.php/viewDoc/24469
/.
2.
HDA SBU, f. 16, spr. 1028. Originally published by the Center for Research into the Liberation Movement (TsDVR) together with the Ivan Franko National University of Lviv at http://avr.org.ua/index.php/viewDoc/24446/.
3.
Geist, E. (2015). Political Fallout: The Failure of Emergency Management at Chernobyl’.
Slavic Review, 74(1), 104–126. https://doi.org/10.5612/slavicreview.74.1.104
4.
BARNETT, L. (2007). Psychosocial effects of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. Medicine, Conflict and Survival
, 23
(1), 46–57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27017749
Compare the narratives presented in your primary and secondary sources relevant to your historical event.
The narratives presented in these sources provide a range of perspectives on the Chernobyl disaster and its aftermath, with a particular focus on the social implications. Source four examines the psychological factors surrounding the disaster, such as the trauma experienced during evacuation and the long-term effects faced by refugees. It also
highlights the breakdown of the Soviet Union, leading to the collapse of health services and an increase in poverty. The source emphasizes the development of new treatment methods within UNESCO Community Centers to address these social and psychological challenges. Source three explores the response of the Soviet government to the catastrophe, focusing on the bewilderment and criticism it faced. It delves into the political and institutional factors that hindered the government from taking appropriate action to protect citizens. Source two, represented by Comrade V.A. Yavorivskiy, raises concerns about unresolved issues in addressing the aftermath of the Chernobyl accident, particularly regarding the design defects in reactors, the technical condition of equipment,
and the safety of the "Ukrytiye" facility. The source also emphasizes the need for a unified scientific approach and the potential creation of an inter-agency commission to address the consequences of the disaster. Source one discusses the dissatisfaction among the local population, who felt that evacuated individuals were receiving better treatment. It highlights incidents like the arrival of a truck loaded with vodka and complications in food availability, reflecting the social tensions and challenges faced by the affected communities. These narratives offer valuable insights into the social impacts of the Chernobyl disaster, addressing issues such as psychological trauma, government
response, technical concerns, and societal dissatisfaction. They contribute to our understanding of the complex and far-reaching consequences of the catastrophe on individuals, communities, and society as a whole.
Describe one narrative that has significantly influenced the contemporary understanding of your historical event.
The social narrative surrounding the Chernobyl disaster has significantly influenced the contemporary understanding of the event. Beyond the physical and environmental consequences, Chernobyl has symbolized various themes and issues that have shaped collective consciousness. The social narrative has highlighted the human tragedy, emphasizing personal stories and deepening empathy and understanding of the individual
and collective suffering caused by the accident. The social narrative has also shed light on government negligence and cover-ups, fueling discussions on accountability and transparency in similar situations. Chernobyl has become a focal point in the ongoing debate surrounding nuclear power, with the social narrative influencing public opinion and policy decisions on the balance between benefits and risks. Additionally, Chernobyl is seen as a symbol of the failures of the Soviet system, highlighting the shortcomings of centralized control and the consequences of prioritizing political interests over public safety. The media representation of Chernobyl in various forms has also played a significant role in shaping the contemporary understanding of the event, influencing public perception and shedding light on the complexities and nuances of the disaster. Overall, the social narrative surrounding Chernobyl has contributed to a deeper understanding of the event, its consequences, and the broader issues it represents, sparking conversations about nuclear energy, government accountability, environmental impact, and the resilience of affected communities.
Explain how the chosen narrative helps you better understand your historical research question. Please provide your revised research question and then explain how the chosen narrative helps you better understand your historical event.
How did the social factors, such as government response, public perception, and the experiences of affected individuals and communities, shape the handling of the Chernobyl disaster and its long-term impact?
The social narrative is essential for understanding historical events, including the Chernobyl disaster. By examining social factors such as government response, public perception, and the experiences of affected individuals and communities, we can gain deeper insights into how these factors influenced the handling of the disaster and its long-
term impact. The government's decisions and actions were influenced by political considerations, public pressure, and the need for control. Public perception shaped government policies, media coverage, and public discourse, affecting decision-making processes and resource allocation. The experiences of those affected shed light on the social and psychological impact and community responses. By exploring the social narrative, we can better understand how social factors shaped the Chernobyl disaster and its aftermath.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help