Sp21_Activity1_Geoscience-student
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
101
Subject
Geology
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by BrigadierBuffalo1397
Plenge GEOL101 Sp21
Name_____Poojha Palle_______
Activity 1: Intro to Geoscience (Individual Completion Activity)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After completing this activity individually, you will have a group assessment in class on Wednesday.
Bring
this document to Wednesday’s synchronous Zoom class session to work with your teammates.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learning objectives: Students will be able to:
Differentiate between hypotheses and predictions and generate examples of each.
Differentiate between deductive and inductive reasoning
Identify types of data sets (e.g., observational vs. modeled) needed to test a given hypothesis
Differentiate between the heliocentric and geocentric model of the solar system and explain how the
retrograde motion of Mars was explained in each.
Define Kepler’s laws and identify how these laws allowed mathematical models to better approximate
observational data
Background: Here are some definitions written out for each term:
u
Hypotheses
are proposed
answers or explanations to scientific questions
, based on background
knowledge/prior data.
Hypotheses are used as starting places for further investigation.
They must be
testable
and falsifiable
to be useful in scientific investigations.
u
Example: “The Moon has different phases because the half of the Moon that is lit by the Sun is
not always facing the Earth.”
u
Predictions
are the expected results of tests/experiments or natural events based on hypotheses…
often (but not always) an if/then statement.
u
Example: “If the Earth is between the Moon and the Sun, then the Moon is visible from Earth as
a full moon”
u
Models
can be used to help make predictions, or to test if a prediction is correct or not.
u
Example: Visual models illustrating how the moon would look from the Earth based on the
position of the Sun, Earth and Moon, e.g.:
u
https://ccnmtl.github.io/astro-simulations/lunar-phase-simulator/
u
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wz01pTvuMa0
u
Inductive Reasoning
occurs when scientists draw general conclusions from specific observations.
u
Observations are used to generate hypotheses, which may be confirmed or rejected by
additional observations/experiments.
u
Example: “Three massive hurricanes caused large amounts of damage to the U.S during the
2005 hurricane season: Hurricane Katrina (902 mbar pressure), Hurricane Rita (898 mbar
pressure), and Hurricane Wilma (882 mbar pressure).
Based on this evidence, we conclude that
hurricanes with air pressures of ~900 mbar will cause large amounts of damage.”
u
Think of this as “trial-and-error” style reasoning.
Scientists who use inductive reasoning may
not be testing a specific hypothesis when they recognize a pattern in observations that leads
them to a new hypothesis.
u
Deductive Reasoning
occurs when scientists use a general principle/hypothesis to reach a conclusion
u
A general principle/hypothesis is used to obtained to get specific results; the hypothesis may be
confirmed or rejected based on whether or not these results are obtained.
u
Example: “All hurricanes form as low-atmospheric-pressure systems over the ocean.
Therefore,
Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Rita, and Hurricane Wilma were all low-pressure systems.”
u
Think of this as reasoning by drawing conclusions based on logic and previous
knowledge/assumptions.
Part 1: Hypotheses, Models, Predictions.
Inductive and Deductive reasoning.
Corresponding Lecture materials:
Lecture 1&2
Corresponding book chapter:
Chapters 1
Other required materials
: Definitions on previous page, animations linked within Part 1 questions.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
Complete this Venn diagram contrasting scientific models, hypotheses, and predictions. There will NOT
be an equal number of answers in each section of the diagram.
2.
Practice generating hypotheses and predictions for the scientific questions below.
You do not have to
come up with the correct answer: you just want to practice structuring the statements.
a.
Question 1: Why do we have seasons on Earth?
i.
Hypothesis
:
One statement answer, should have a “why” component, e.g., “we have
seasons because…..”
We have seasons on Earth because the Earth rotates on an axis, causing different areas
to be at varying distances from the sun at different times of the year.
ii.
Data needed:
What kinds of data would we need in order to test our hypothesis?
We would need temperature data from countries in the northern and southern
hemisphere to distinguish the tilt of the Earth’s axis. We would also need agricultural
and climate data to see how crops react to weather during different times of the year.
iii.
Prediction
:
What should the data show if our hypothesis is correct?
The data would show that for around 6 months, the northern hemisphere will be
colder while the southern hemisphere is warmer and vice versa for the next six
months. It would show that for both hemispheres, temperatures stay high and stay
low consistently during these six months.
b.
Question 2: Why do lunar eclipses occur?
i.
Hypothesis
:
One statement answer, should have a “why” component, e.g., “we have
seasons because…..”
1
Model
Hypothesis
Prediction
A.
Proposed explanation to a
scientific question
B.
Use data (observations) + prior
knowledge
C.
Expected future condition,
deduced from a hypothesis
D.
Used to collect or organize data
to test a hypothesis
E.
“The Moon has different phases
because sometimes parts of the
moon are covered up by Earth’s
shadow”
F.
“If the Earth is between the
Moon and the Sun, then the
Moon will not be visible.”
Lunar eclipses occur because the Earth falls directly between the sun and the moon,
causing no sunlight to reflect off the moon.
ii.
Data needed:
What kinds of data would we need in order to test our hypothesis?
We would need to collect data on the trajectories of the moon and earth. We would
need to collect data on when each lunar eclipse has occurred and whether there is a
pattern. We could also collect temperature data of the moon’s surface to see whether
it changes without the sun.
iii.
Prediction
:
What should the data show if our hypothesis is correct?
The data will show that lunar eclipses occur around twice a year with no steady date
because the moon’s orbit around the Earth is tilted in comparison to the Earth’s orbit
around the sun. The temperature data would show that the moon’s temperature
decreases significantly because it has no access to the sun’s rays.
3.
Look at this model of the Sun-Earth-Moon system:
https://ccnmtl.github.io/astro-simulations/lunar-
phase-simulator/
a.
If you compared the data you could collect from this model to real-world observational data,
would this model be sufficient to test your hypothesis about the cause of lunar eclipses?
Why
or why not?
This model would be sufficient because it shows that the moon’s orbit can put the Earth
directly between it and the sun.
b.
Check out the two lunar eclipse videos linked below, which show other visualizations of the Sun-
Earth-Moon system.
Do they add useful data?
If these videos make you want to revise your
hypothesis, prediction, or data needed, explain how.
i.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHr2BxPcmjM
ii.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi8TqMgU0
The second video on eclipse geometry brings up interesting points regarding the moon and
earth’s umbra. Because the moon is significantly smaller than the Earth, its shadow produced
by the sun is smaller which is why lunar eclipses are more frequent than solar eclipses. I
would revise my hypothesis slightly: lunar eclipses occur because, at a certain point in its
orbit, the moon is completely covered by Earth’s umbra, or shadow, which blocks the light
from the sun that gives the moon its glow.
4.
Identify each statement as using inductive or deductive reasoning and justify your answer.
Don’t
worry about whether or not the statement is correct.
a.
Large planets have a stronger gravitational force than small planets.
Therefore, large planets
should have more moons than small planets.
(circle one)
INDUCTIVE /
DEDUCTIVE.
Justify your answer.
2
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
This statement is deductive because a hypothesis/theory is used to conclude that larger
planets should have more moons than smaller planets. “Large planets have a stronger
gravitational force” is a hypothesis that has been reached with the help of planetary data.
b.
The coelacanth is an ancient species of fish: Fossil evidence of this fish was first found in
Cretaceous-aged rocks in 1836.
Scientists examined other rock samples and modern waters
from 1836-1936 without finding any more fossils or live specimens.
Therefore, this fish is
extinct.
(circle one)
INDUCTIVE / DEDUCTIVE.
Justify your answer.
This statement is inductive because the conclusion—the coelacanth species of fish is extinct—
is based off of observations from fossilized data found from the Cretaceous-aged rocks in
1836.
Part 2: Retrograde motion (questions on next page)
Corresponding Lecture materials:
Lecture 1&2
Corresponding book chapter:
Chapters 1
Other required materials
: Animations and webpages linked below, which re-iterates and adds to class notes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOjrPcD6Iuc
http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~blackman/ast104/retrograde7.html
, read all
http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~blackman/ast104/aristotle8.html
, Sections: “Epicycles and planetary
motion, more sophisticated epicycles: The Ptolmaic Universe”
https://www.pas.rochester.edu/~blackman/ast104/copernican9.html
, read all but “Been there; done
that…”
5.
Read the information on the second link given in the list above. Did Aristotle use deductive or inductive
reasoning?
(circle one)
INDUCTIVE /
DEDUCTIVE
.
Justify your answer.
I would say he used deductive reasoning, but the theories and hypotheses he based his
conclusion on were unfounded. Because Aristotle was also a philosopher, he based his theory
of uniform circular motion on the Earth being the center of the universe. However, there were
many ways to prove that this theory was unreasonable.
6.
Can the geocentric solar system model explain the retrograde motion of Mars?
(circle one)
a.
Yes, if we assume that the Earth and Mars orbit at different speeds.
b.
Yes, if we assume that the orbit of Mars is closer to the Sun than Earth’s orbit is
c.
Yes, if we assume that the orbit of Mars incorporates epicycles
d.
No explanation for the retrograde motion of Mars was incorporated into geocentric model
7.
Can the heliocentric solar system model explain the retrograde motion of Mars?
(circle one)
a.
Yes, if we assume that the Earth and Mars orbit at different speeds.
b.
Yes, if we assume that the orbit of Mars is closer to the Sun than Earth’s orbit is
c.
Yes, if we assume that the orbit of Mars incorporates epicycles
d.
No explanation for the retrograde motion of Mars was incorporated into heliocentric model
3
8.
Sometimes incorrect models still have some predictive power, e.g., both the geocentric and heliocentric
solar system models could calculate approximate positions of the planets.
How can scientists
determine which model is correct in cases like this?
Models can have predictive power, but they cannot explain everything. Geocentric models could only
explain direct motion, while heliocentric models explained retrograde motion as well. This in itself
proved that heliocentric was more accurate than geocentric. As scientists narrowed the number of
accurate theories, it became easier to derive a correct model of the solar system.
9.
Why was the heliocentric solar system an example of deductive reasoning when it was first proposed?
(circle one)
a.
This model was a conclusion drawn from a series of observations that could not be explained
any other way
b.
Mathematical models based on heliocentric theory could predict the movement of planets with
some accuracy
c.
Scientists started with the assumption that the solar system was heliocentric.
Results from
modelling indicated that this assumption was reasonable.
4