Assignment 3 ACCT 73120 FAll 2023 with solutions
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Conestoga College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1030
Subject
Finance
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
8
Uploaded by ElderMoon11200
Assignment 3
Question 1 (20 mrks)
Case One -
Land with a cost of $423,000 and a FMV of $647,000 is sold to a corporation in exchange for
$47,000 in NSC and $600,000 in preferred shares (FMV and legal capital).
Case Two -
Inventories with a FMV of $87,400 and a cost of $63,200 are sold in exchange for $70,000 in
NSC and $17,400 in common shares (FMV and legal capital).
Case Three -
Depreciable property with a FMV of $124,000, an ACB and capital cost of $115,000, and a
UCC of $52,992, is sold for NSC of $100,000, preferred shares with a FMV and legal capital of $10,000, and
common shares with a FMV and a legal capital of $14,000.
Required
: For each of the three Cases provide the following information:
A. The minimum and maximum elected amount under the provisions of ITA 85.(1)
B. Assuming the minimum elected amount is chosen, the amount of capital gain or business income to be
included in the income of the seller.
C. Again assuming that the minimum elected amount is chosen, determine the ACB and PUC of the
preferred share and common share consideration.
1
Question 2 (10 Marks)
Monique Tabor has a depreciable property that she wishes to sell to a new corporation using ITA 85(1).
The property has an ACB and capital cost of $450,000, a UCC of $225,000, and a FMV of $675,000. The
transfer will take place at an elected amount of $400,000.
Ms. Tabor is considering the following alternative forms of consideration:
Alternative
One
Two
Three
Promissory Note
$150,000
$375,000
$300,000
Preferred Shares
150,000
300,000
Nil
Common Shares
375,000
Nil
375,000
Total
$675,000
$675,000
$675,000
All of the amounts in the preceding table are shown at their respective FMVs.
Required:
A. For each of the three alternatives, determine the ACB of the consideration received.
B. For each of the three alternatives, determine the legal capital and PUC of the share consideration.
Question 3 (20 marks)
Several years ago, Ms. Jennifer Bond acquired a business location that included land and a building for a
total of $950,000. At the time, it was estimated that the FMV of the land was $220,000 and the FMV of the
building was $730,000.
Ms. Bond carried on the business for several years as a sole proprietor and, during this period, CCA was
claimed on the building. As there were years in which she experienced losses, she did not always claim
the maximum amount of CCA.
Ms. Bond has agreed to take your advice and incorporate the business. She will use ITA 85(1) to sell the
land and building to the new corporation in January of 2023. At the time of the sale, the building had a
UCC of $625,000. Other relevant amounts were as follows:
Elected
Property
Tax Cost
FMV
Amount
Land
$220,000
$ 510,000
$220,000
Building
625,000
980,000
730,000
Total
$845,000
$1,490,000
$950,000
There is a $400,000 mortgage on the property that will be assumed by the new corporation. In addition,
the new corporation will issue a $500,000 promissory note to Ms. Bond. The remaining consideration will
be in the form of common shares with a FMV and legal capital of $590,000. The new corporation does not
have a balance in its GRIP account in any of the taxation years under consideration.
Required:
A. What are the income tax consequences of making this sale at an elected amount of $950,000? Your
answer should include amounts to be included in Ms. Bond's income as a result of the sale, as well as the
corporation's tax costs for the land and building.
2
B. Compute the ACB of the consideration that Ms. Bond has received from the corporation.
C. Compute the PUC of the common share consideration.
D. What amounts would be included in Ms. Bond's 2023 net income if, in 2023, she sells the common
shares for $650,000?
3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Solution 1:
Case One - Land
A. The acceptable range of elected amounts is between the ACB of $423,000 and the FMV of $647,000.
B. Using the minimum elected amount of $423,000 would result in no additional income.
C. The ACB of the preferred shares would be calculated as follows:
Elected Amount
$423,000
FMV of NSC
( 47,000)
ACB - Preferred Shares
$376,000
The PUC reduction would be calculated as follows:
Increase in Legal Capital
$600,000
Less The excess, if any, of:
Elected Amount
($423,000)
Over FMV of NSC
47,000
( 376,000)
PUC Reduction
$224,000
This would leave the PUC of the preferred shares at $376,000 ($600,000 - $224,000).
There are no deemed dividends under ITA 84(1) or shareholder benefits under ITA 15(1) since the FMV of
the property sold equals the FMV of the consideration received.
Case Two - Inventories
A. The range of values would be between the $70,000 in FMV of NSC and the FMV of $87,400.
B. Using the minimum $70,000 elected amount would result in business income of $6,800 ($70,000 -
$63,200).
C. The ACB of the common shares would be calculated as follows:
Elected Amount
$70,000
Less: FMV of NSC
( 70,000)
ACB - Common Shares
Nil
The PUC reduction would be calculated as follows:
Increase in Legal Capital
$17,400
Less the excess, if any, of:
Elected Amount
($70,000)
Over the FMV of NSC
70,000
( Nil)
PUC Reduction
$17,400
This would leave the PUC of the common shares at nil ($17,400 - $17,400).
There are no deemed dividends under ITA 84(1) or shareholder benefits under ITA 15(1) since the FMV of
the property sold equals the FMV of the consideration received.
4
Case Three - Depreciable Property
A. The range would be between the FMV of the NSC of $100,000 and the FMV of $124,000.
B. Using the $100,000 elected amount would result in business income (recapture) of $47,008 ($100,000 -
$52,992).
C. The ACB of the preferred shares and common shares would be calculated as follows:
Elected Amount
$100,000
Less: FMV of NSC
( 100,000)
ACB - Preferred Shares and Common Shares
Nil
The PUC reduction on the preferred and common shares would be calculated as follows:
Increase in Legal Capital ($10,000 + $14,000)
$24,000
Less the excess, if any, of:
Elected Amount
($100,000)
Over the FMV of NSC
100,000
( Nil)
PUC Reduction
$24,000
The PUC of both the preferred and common shares would be nil ($24,000 - $24,000). The allocation of the
PUC reduction would be $10,000 and $14,000 respectively resulting in nil PUC for both classes of shares.
There are no deemed dividends under ITA 84(1) or shareholder benefits under ITA 15(1) since the FMV of
the property sold equals the FMV of the consideration received.
Solution 2
Part A - ACB of Consideration
The ACB of the consideration, under the three alternatives, would be calculated as follows:
Alternative
One
Two
Three
Elected Amount
$400,000
$400,000
$400,000
Less: FMV of NSC
( 150,000)
( 375,000)
( 300,000)
Available for Share Consideration
$250,000
$ 25,000
$100,000
Less: ACB - Preferred Stock
( 150,000)
( 25,000)
N/A
ACB - Common Stock (Residual)
$100,000
N/A
$100,000
The ACB of the NSC is equal to its FMV.
Part B - Legal Capital and PUC
The legal capital for the two classes of shares would be as follows:
Alternative
One
Two
Three
Preferred Shares
$150,000
$300,000
Nil
Common Shares
375,000
Nil
$375,000
Total Legal Capital
$525,000
$300,000
$375,000
The required PUC reduction would be calculated as follows:
Alternative
One
Two
Three
Increase in Legal Capital
- All Shares (A)
$525,000
$300,000
$375,000
5
Elected Amount
($400,000)
($400,000)
($400,000)
FMV of NSC
150,000
375,000
300,000
Elected Amount, Less NSC (B)
( $250,000)
($ 25,000)
($100,000)
Required PUC Reduction (A - B)
$275,000
$275,000
$275,000
Alternative One -
In Alternative One, the PUC reduction would have to be split between the two classes
of shares on the basis of their relative FMVs. The relevant calculation would be as follows:
Preferred Shares: [($275,000)($150,000 ÷ $525,000)] = $78,571
Common Shares: [($275,000)($375,000 ÷ $525,000)] = $196,429
This would leave PUC of $71,429 ($150,000 - $78,571) for the preferred shares, and PUC of $178,571
($375,000 - $196,429) for the common shares.
Alternative Two -
In Alternative Two, the entire PUC reduction of $275,000 would be allocated to the
preferred shares, leaving PUC of $25,000 ($300,000 - $275,000).
Alternative Three -
In Alternative Three, the entire PUC reduction of $275,000 would be allocated to the
common stock, leaving PUC of $100,000 ($375,000 - $275,000).
6
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Solution 3
Part A - Income Tax Consequences of Sale
With respect to the land, the $220,000 elected amount will be both the POD to Ms. Bond and the ACB to
the corporation. As the elected amount is equal to Ms. Bond's ACB, there will be no income tax
consequences resulting from the sale of the land.
The elected amount and POD for the building is its original cost, an amount that is in excess of its UCC.
This will result in Ms. Bond having to include recapture of $105,000 ($730,000 - $625,000) in her 2023
income. However, with the elected amount at Ms. Bond's original cost for the building, both the capital
cost and the UCC will be equal to the elected amount of $730,000.
Part B - ACB of Consideration
The ACB of all consideration received by Ms. Bond will be the total elected amount of $950,000. It will be
allocated as follow:
Elected Amount
$950,000
FMV of NSC
($400,000 Assumed Debt + $500,000 Promissory Note)
( 900,000)
ACB of Common Shares
$ 50,000
Part C - PUC of the Share Consideration
The calculation of PUC would be as follows:
Increase in Legal Capital (FMV)
$590,000
Less Excess of:
Elected Amount
($950,000)
Over the FMV of NSC
900,000
( 50,000)
PUC Reduction
$540,000
The PUC of the common shares would be reduced to $50,000 ($590,000 - $540,000).
Part D - Sale of Common Shares
The increase in 2023 net income from a sale of the shares received as consideration for $650,000 would be
as follows:
POD
$650,000
ACB
( 50,000)
Capital Gain
$600,000
Inclusion Rate
1/2
Taxable Capital Gain
$300,000
7
Income Tax Consequences of Redemption
The income tax consequences of a redemption of the shares issued as consideration for $650,000 would be
as follows:
Proceeds of Redemption
$650,000
Less: PUC
( 50,000)
ITA 84(3) Deemed Dividend (Non-Eligible)
$600,000
There would be no capital gain on this redemption as shown in the following calculation:
Redemption Proceeds
$650,000
Less: ITA 84(3) Deemed Dividend
( 600,000)
Modified POD
$ 50,000
ACB
( 50,000)
Capital Gain
Nil
The amount to be included in income for 2023 would be $690,000, the $600,000 deemed non-eligible
dividend grossed up by 15%.
There would also be a federal dividend tax credit of $62,308 [(9/13)(15%)($600,000)].
8
Related Documents
Related Questions
3
arrow_forward
Question #3:
Sam, Paul, Carlos and Jai form Pinochle Corporation by contributing the following assets to Pinochle:
# of Shares
Basis to
Fair Market
Other Prop.
Transferor
Value
Issued
Rec' by S/H
Sam contributes:
Inventory
$30,000
$96,000
30
$6,000 Cash
$45,000
Paul had taken $30,000 of depreciation in prior years
Paul contributes:
Equipment
$99,000
30
$9,000 Cash
Carlos
Secret Formula $15,000
$90,000
30
Jai
Cash
$30,000
$30,000
10
a. What is Sam's recognized gain related to this transaction?
b. What is Seth's basis in his Pinochle stock?
c. What is Pinochle's basis in the inventory?
d. What is Paul's recognized gain or loss?
e. Is Paul's' gain or loss capital or ordinary?
f. What is Paul's basis in his Pinochle stock?
g. What is Pinochle's basis in the equipment?
h. What is Carlos' recognized gain on the transaction?
i. What is Pinochle's basis in the secret formula?
j. What is Jai's recognized gain or loss?
k. What is Jai's basis in his Pinochle stock?
arrow_forward
4
arrow_forward
MCQ
arrow_forward
I need questions answers accounting
arrow_forward
Answer and explain with computation
Company's issued 20,000 share capital receiving land with fair value of P500,000. If the share capital is no par and no stated value and the cost of the land is P200,000, how much in the legal capital?
A. P-0
b. P200,000
c. P300,000
d. P500,000
arrow_forward
pls answer and provide solution and explanation
arrow_forward
Question Content Area
Kansas Company acquired a building valued at $163,000 for property tax purposes in exchange for 12,000 shares of its $4 par common stock. The stock is widely traded and selling for $15 per share. At what amount should the building be recorded by Kansas Company?
a. $48,000
b. $131,500
c. $180,000
d. $163,000
arrow_forward
PROBLEM VII
On July 1, 2019, Eya Company acquired 700,000 shares of Agas Company at a price of P13 per share. Eya estimated that the price paid
include P1.50 premium in order to gain control over Agas. On this date, the fair values of Agas' identifiable assets and liabilities and their
carrying values are given below:
Book Value
P2,000,000
9,000,000
P3,000,000
5,000,000
3,000,000
Fair Value
P2,000,000
11,000,000
Current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Liabilities
Ordinary shares, P5 par
Retained earnings
1. Determine the amount of goodwill.
arrow_forward
Problem 10-24 (Static) (LO 10-1, 10-3, 10-4)
On December 18, 2020, Stephanie Corporation acquired 100 percent of a Swiss company for 4.0 million Swiss francs (CHF), which is
indicative of book and fair value. At the acquisition date, the exchange rate was $1.00 = CHF 1. On December 18, 2020, the book and
fair values of the subsidiary's assets and liabilities were as follows:
Cash
Inventory
Property, plant, and equipment
Notes payable
CHF
800,000
1,300,000
4,000,000
(2,100,000)
Stephanie prepares consolidated financial statements on December 31, 2020. By that date, the Swiss franc has appreciated to $1.10 =
CHF 1. Because of the year-end holidays, no transactions took place prior to consolidation.
a. Determine the translation adjustment to be reported on Stephanie's December 31, 2020, consolidated balance sheet, assuming that
the Swiss franc is the Swiss subsidiary's functional currency. What is the economic relevance of this translation adjustment?
b. Determine the remeasurement gain…
arrow_forward
a1
arrow_forward
(D) A
Problem 7
Free-Strikes Ltd., a Canadian public corporation, has offered Ms. Bast $2,525,000 for the assets,
which started operations in 2009. Batterup Ltd. has been quite profitable in recent years. As a result,
Ms. Bast owns all the common shares of Batterup Ltd., a Canadian-controlled private corporation.
excluding cash, as at December 31, 2022. The offer price reflects unrecorded goodwill of $475,000.
Bast wants to wind up the company after the sale of the assets.
The pro forma balance sheet of Batterup Ltd. as at December 31, 2022, is as follows:
Assets
Cash
TTA: 54, 83(2), 840
84021) 801)
Cost
UCG
FMV
$
25,000
Accounts receivable (net)
87,500
75,000
Inventory.
222,500
155,000
Land
110,000
450,000
Building
350,000
$ 75,000
950,000
450,000
220,000
100,000
142,500
320,000
$1,387,500
$2,050,000
Equipment
Marketable securities
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Future income taxes.
Shareholder's Equity
Share capital (PUC)
Retained earnings
Total liabilities and equity
Additional…
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Related Questions
- 3arrow_forwardQuestion #3: Sam, Paul, Carlos and Jai form Pinochle Corporation by contributing the following assets to Pinochle: # of Shares Basis to Fair Market Other Prop. Transferor Value Issued Rec' by S/H Sam contributes: Inventory $30,000 $96,000 30 $6,000 Cash $45,000 Paul had taken $30,000 of depreciation in prior years Paul contributes: Equipment $99,000 30 $9,000 Cash Carlos Secret Formula $15,000 $90,000 30 Jai Cash $30,000 $30,000 10 a. What is Sam's recognized gain related to this transaction? b. What is Seth's basis in his Pinochle stock? c. What is Pinochle's basis in the inventory? d. What is Paul's recognized gain or loss? e. Is Paul's' gain or loss capital or ordinary? f. What is Paul's basis in his Pinochle stock? g. What is Pinochle's basis in the equipment? h. What is Carlos' recognized gain on the transaction? i. What is Pinochle's basis in the secret formula? j. What is Jai's recognized gain or loss? k. What is Jai's basis in his Pinochle stock?arrow_forward4arrow_forward
- MCQarrow_forwardI need questions answers accountingarrow_forwardAnswer and explain with computation Company's issued 20,000 share capital receiving land with fair value of P500,000. If the share capital is no par and no stated value and the cost of the land is P200,000, how much in the legal capital? A. P-0 b. P200,000 c. P300,000 d. P500,000arrow_forward
- pls answer and provide solution and explanationarrow_forwardQuestion Content Area Kansas Company acquired a building valued at $163,000 for property tax purposes in exchange for 12,000 shares of its $4 par common stock. The stock is widely traded and selling for $15 per share. At what amount should the building be recorded by Kansas Company? a. $48,000 b. $131,500 c. $180,000 d. $163,000arrow_forwardPROBLEM VII On July 1, 2019, Eya Company acquired 700,000 shares of Agas Company at a price of P13 per share. Eya estimated that the price paid include P1.50 premium in order to gain control over Agas. On this date, the fair values of Agas' identifiable assets and liabilities and their carrying values are given below: Book Value P2,000,000 9,000,000 P3,000,000 5,000,000 3,000,000 Fair Value P2,000,000 11,000,000 Current assets Property, plant and equipment Liabilities Ordinary shares, P5 par Retained earnings 1. Determine the amount of goodwill.arrow_forward
- Problem 10-24 (Static) (LO 10-1, 10-3, 10-4) On December 18, 2020, Stephanie Corporation acquired 100 percent of a Swiss company for 4.0 million Swiss francs (CHF), which is indicative of book and fair value. At the acquisition date, the exchange rate was $1.00 = CHF 1. On December 18, 2020, the book and fair values of the subsidiary's assets and liabilities were as follows: Cash Inventory Property, plant, and equipment Notes payable CHF 800,000 1,300,000 4,000,000 (2,100,000) Stephanie prepares consolidated financial statements on December 31, 2020. By that date, the Swiss franc has appreciated to $1.10 = CHF 1. Because of the year-end holidays, no transactions took place prior to consolidation. a. Determine the translation adjustment to be reported on Stephanie's December 31, 2020, consolidated balance sheet, assuming that the Swiss franc is the Swiss subsidiary's functional currency. What is the economic relevance of this translation adjustment? b. Determine the remeasurement gain…arrow_forwarda1arrow_forward(D) A Problem 7 Free-Strikes Ltd., a Canadian public corporation, has offered Ms. Bast $2,525,000 for the assets, which started operations in 2009. Batterup Ltd. has been quite profitable in recent years. As a result, Ms. Bast owns all the common shares of Batterup Ltd., a Canadian-controlled private corporation. excluding cash, as at December 31, 2022. The offer price reflects unrecorded goodwill of $475,000. Bast wants to wind up the company after the sale of the assets. The pro forma balance sheet of Batterup Ltd. as at December 31, 2022, is as follows: Assets Cash TTA: 54, 83(2), 840 84021) 801) Cost UCG FMV $ 25,000 Accounts receivable (net) 87,500 75,000 Inventory. 222,500 155,000 Land 110,000 450,000 Building 350,000 $ 75,000 950,000 450,000 220,000 100,000 142,500 320,000 $1,387,500 $2,050,000 Equipment Marketable securities Liabilities Current liabilities Future income taxes. Shareholder's Equity Share capital (PUC) Retained earnings Total liabilities and equity Additional…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you