Modified Problem Assignment 3 (1)

pdf

School

Humber College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

254

Subject

Finance

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

3

Uploaded by tastyyum9

Report
Introduction: Investing in mutual funds is a strategy widely used by individuals seeking to grow their wealth over time. Funds come in various forms, from conservative bond funds to aggressive international equity funds. Constructing a well-balanced portfolio is crucial to achieving financial goals while managing risk. In this analysis, we consider three distinct portfolios composed of a bond fund (ZCS.TO), a Canadian equity fund (VCN.TO), and an international fund (XWD.TO). Each portfolio has a different risk and return profile, designed to cater to investors with varying levels of risk tolerance. Selected Funds: Bond Fund: BMO Short Corporate Bond ETF (Ticker: ZCS.TO). Canadian Equity Fund: Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (Ticker: VCN.TO). iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD.TO) Here are the calculated metrics for the three funds based on the provided data: 1. Average Monthly Returns: ZCS.TO (BMO Short Corporate Bond ETF): 0.16% VCN.TO (Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF): 0.64% XWD.TO (iShares MSCI World Index ETF): 0.90% 2. Standard Deviation: ZCS.TO: 0.74% VCN.TO: 3.90% XWD.TO: 3.55% 3. Correlation Coefficients: ZCS.TO and VCN.TO: 0.53 (moderate positive correlation) ZCS.TO and XWD.TO: 0.56 (moderate positive correlation) VCN.TO and XWD.TO: 0.75 (strong positive correlation)
To construct three portfolios from the mutual funds (ZCS.TO, VCN.TO, XWD.TO) and analyze them, we can use different weight combinations for each fund in each portfolio. Let's define the portfolios as follows: Portfolio A: Conservative: Higher allocation to the bond fund (ZCS.TO). Example Allocation: 70% ZCS.TO, 15% VCN.TO, 15% XWD.TO Portfolio B: Balanced: Equal allocation to each fund. Example Allocation: 33.3% ZCS.TO, 33.3% VCN.TO, 33.3% XWD.TO Portfolio C: Aggressive: Higher allocation to equity funds (VCN.TO and XWD.TO). Example Allocation: 20% ZCS.TO, 40% VCN.TO, 40% XWD.TO The strengths and weaknesses of the portfolios can be commented on as follows: Portfolio A (Conservative): Strengths: Lower standard deviation indicates lower risk. Good for risk-averse investors or those nearing retirement. Weaknesses: Lower expected return may not outpace inflation or lead to significant growth over time. Portfolio B (Balanced): Strengths: A balance between risk and return. Suitable for investors with a moderate risk appetite. Weaknesses: May not provide as high returns as a more aggressive portfolio or as much safety as a conservative portfolio. Portfolio C (Aggressive): Strengths: Higher expected return, which is ideal for long-term growth and investors with a higher risk tolerance. Weaknesses: Higher standard deviation, indicating higher risk and potential for greater short-term volatility.
Personal preference would depend on the individual's investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. For long-term growth, one might prefer Portfolio C, while for preserving capital, Portfolio A might be more suitable. Portfolio B offers a middle ground that might appeal to someone seeking both modest growth and some level of risk management. Based on the information provided earlier, here are the expected rates of return and standard deviations calculated for each portfolio: Portfolio A (Conservative): Expected Rate of Return: 0.343% Standard Deviation: 1.41% Portfolio B (Balanced): Expected Rate of Return: 0.567% Standard Deviation: 2.47% Portfolio C (Aggressive): Expected Rate of Return: 0.649% Standard Deviation: 2.87% Conclusion: After examining the three diversified portfolios—Conservative (Portfolio A), Balanced (Portfolio B), and Aggressive (Portfolio C) I've assessed the potential risks and returns associated with each. Portfolio A is tailored for those seeking stability, Portfolio B for individuals looking for a moderate approach, and Portfolio C for investors chasing higher returns at the cost of higher risk. The choice of portfolio should align with an investor's financial objectives, time horizon, and risk appetite. An informed investor will weigh these factors before committing capital, ensuring that their investment choice is a step toward achieving their long-term financial aspirations.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help